this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
668 points (97.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45044 readers
363 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mech@feddit.org 195 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

She was abused for nude modelling and movie roles that sexualized her, including fully nude sex scenes, from age 11 on.
The movies were shown in theatres and on TV. Mainstream magazines published the pictures.
Fucked up times.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 153 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Nude scenes/nudity is not a problem. Nudity is completely natural and should be normalised. The problem is in sexualising children, whether they're nude or not.

It's important to not conflate the two to avoid reinforcing puritanical views around nudity.

[–] mech@feddit.org 89 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While I agree with your point, she played a child prostitute whose virginity was sold to the highest bidder.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 57 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes, and it's literally based on a true story that has happened a hundred times over and the film portrays this as a horrible thing.

Like the story is repellent and horrible because it is supposed to be. This is like a criticism of Schindler's List because it portrays a genocide.

It's funny because there is plenty of horrifying and deliberately salacious shit that they did with Shields that would merit more criticism. How about her fully nude appearance in Playboy at ten?

[–] False@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I can't imagine volunteering my child to take that role personally. They don't have the maturity to understand the subject matter

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Her mom was a horrible person.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

The biggest thing I learned from living in Italy for two years and then marrying a Korean woman a few years after that is that Americans have fucked up views on sexuality and nudity. I came from a pretty liberal secular hippie type family and I was surprised to find I had some residual cultural hang ups just from growing up in the US.

[–] axh@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm from Poland and didn't think about it until I found that in the first part of The Witcher games, the game that is directed to adults, they had to develop a special versions for the USA. The version included full violence with decapitations and gore, but showing a woman's nipple was too far so they had to censor it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago

No you're right, and part of the problem in the US is our absolutely batshit, contradictory social conditioning around sex, nudity and the body.

We are utterly archaic in social attitudes here. We had a full-on national crisis when everyone saw a nipple at the super-bowl one time. Yet we sexualize anything remotely female and young to a sickening degree.

This kind of weird paradoxical attitude designed to make you feel shame and desire together has completely ruined any chance of healthy attitudes around sex for millions of young boys who grew up in this media landscape, and had no idea how to deal with it and fell down the incel pipeline, and millions of young girls who only see a world of predation and those angry incels and want nothing to do with dating or boys, driving the wedge further and further.

This utterly baffling societal attitude has empowered people like Epstein and his affiliates since way back, and made it a lot easier for people to commit sex crimes, particularly against children. 🙈 🙉 🙊

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 28 points 3 weeks ago

I would argue that while nudity at home should not be an issue, the nature of the film industry means that even if the nudity is presented in a naturalistic fashion, the fact it is on film makes it exploitative.

Imagine being 10-12 years old, naked, and surrounded by adults (mostly men,) some of whom are more or less ordering you around. I can’t imagine a way to make that anything other than deeply distressing for a child.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 45 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I dunno. People are actively siding with pedophiles now so Im not sure we changed much.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty Baby is a 1978 film where she portrays a child prostitute. There's a scene where her virginity is auctioned off and a main plot point is that a grown man falls in love with her and wants to marry her. I watched it as a young teen (~12) and I was horrified.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

To be clear, the film treats this as the atrocity that it is and is based on a true story.

You probably wouldn't describe this relationship as "falling in love" if you saw it as an adult. Nothing about this relationship is portrayed as healthy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 91 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If you are not familiar with Brooke's story... I'm sorry for ruining you day.

Shields, now 59, has been vocal about her experiences, including her infamous appearance in Playboy at age 10 and her role when she was a minor in The Blue Lagoon, a film that featured her and her co-star in numerous nude scenes.

Source: https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/resurfaced-article-from-1978-describes-12-year-old-brooke-shields-as-a-whore

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 119 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Horrid.

On a similarly infuriating note, the article states, “One user on X, @dvorstone, captured the public's shock and dismay . . . They wrote, ‘I don't think this country has, or even will, come to terms with the sexual corruption of the boomers. From the swinging to divorce to homosexuality, drag/transvestites, and pedophilia, they mainstreamed virtually every sexual degeneracy that has metastasized everywhere in our culture . . .

None of those words belong with pedophilia in that sentence. Breezing by a careless association like that it is why we are in a horrid place right now. This is the sexual corruption of the boomers still at play. Fuck that guy.

A more suitable word would have been “conservative” or “religion,” since those are the key corrupters of civilized society in realtime.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Exactly, the depraved and cruel sex acts (such as rape of children) usually come from sexual repression from religion and lack of education on consent and boundaries due to religious repression.

It does not come from healthy adults exploring with other healthy adults in a consensual environment with healthy boundaries. That comes from sexual education and freedom.

EDIT: What's even more infuriating is the first sentence of that statement is still correct when it comes to rampant child abuse: "I don’t think this country has, or even will, come to terms with the sexual corruption of the boomers." The whole statement is real "they had us in the first half" material.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 85 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (26 children)

What the actual fuck. This article is repulsive. The line just under her cover page picture is fucked up, the whole article is fucked up. I hate to even have this shit attached to my profile, but I’m going to transcribe this shitty article to be best ability so ya’ll can read this shit for yourselves.

Cover Page

Culture Hera Brooke Shields Million-dollar jailbait: She must have been a beautiful baby because today she’s America’s most famous 12-year-old hooker. by Ed Dwyer

Article

The most perfect nymphette in all creation has been found - in America. Her name is Brooks Shields. Brooke’s hair is elegant brown and clean, her skin pale and puritan, her eyes sinfully blue and her lean body just starting to curve into womanhood. She’s a sultry mix of all-American virgin and nascent whore. She’s the hottest new young thing in movies since a smoldering preteen named ElizabethTaylor stiffened up Louie Mayer’s cigar. She is only 12 years old and destined to be the sex symbol of 1984. In Louise Malle’s steamy Pretty Baby, Brooke is Violet, a baby prostitute raise to the chicken trade by her hooker mother (Susan Sarandon). The Frenchman’s film centers on the bordello in the old Storyville district of New Orleans, where Violet lives. The year is 1967, and smack in the middle of that red-light area, bubblin’ with sin, smoke and jazz, crows and female child raise on a diet of cock money. Patrician Brooke is devastating as a little lady who fucks and sucks for bucks. She eases like a vegan through moods that alternate between vulnerable, hot, angelic, mocking and sinful. She seduces both Keith Carradine and the camera in erotic scenes guaranteed to remain sensational for years. Brooke took to Violet’s story like a white takes to champagne. What’s more, is is intoxicating to watch.

Brooke Shields is a sultry mix of all-American virgin and whore.

Brooke’s looks have been her business all her young life. Extraordinarily beautiful even as an infant, Brooke was immediately steered by her mother, ex-model Terri Shields, into a modeling career. Her huge portfolio includes stints as the Ivory baby, a Breck girl, a Colgate kid, plus scads of cover-girl appearances in both women’s and family magazines. She’s been playing the prepubescent vamp since she was eight. At that tender age, she dropped her Garters(?) for a photographer and posed nude. Later she camped it up suggestively in full Victorian bimbo rig - garter belt, silk stockings, high heels. Brooke became a favorite subject for premier photographers like Avedon and Scavullo. By day she was the face that sold, at night she was the princess of wet dreams. Her torrid freshness became an underground legend among the talent set. Producers literally held their breaths, waiting for the remarkable Brooke Sheilds to reach a reasonable age of fuckability, not yet legal but oh so sweet. Welcome to the end of innocence Brookie. Now with Pretty Baby done, Brooke is being flooded with movie proposals. So far, she’s been inked to play the teenage Lucretia Borgia in an upcoming period thriller. And she is slated to star as the tormented young murderess in Alfred Sole’s Communion. By law she’s not permitted to expose her endearing young charms in a magazine until she’s 18. Nevertheless, Brooke recently posed starkers for a lavish Penthouse pictorial spread. Brooke is the first serious actress to violate the preteen sex taboo. Unlike pugnacious Jodie Foster or puerile Tatum O’Neal, she’s the delicious stuff of teenage fantasies become flesh; barely old enough to want, but too young to get. A sweet bird of youth, she comes armed with a sultry self-possession that alarms the sexually insecure adult. A mere prediction of a woman, she stirs erotic passions often better left unsatisfied. She’s a sweet temptation to all but blind men and eunuchs. She’s sister, daughter, sex object, victim, lover, tramp. We can look forward to watching her fill out over the next decade. Brooke Shields is not use another pretty baby; baby.

Hooooly shiiitt. You have NO IDEA how many times I just about threw this whole transcription away and said nope, fuck no. JFC. The ONLY reason I’m leaving this repulsive trash up here is so ya’ll can read how truly fucked up this author is. What the fuck became of this guy? Is he in jail? Looks like maybe this is the guy responsible for the creation of the High Times magazine?

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Thank you for doing that, truly. It’s important to see just how freely pedophiles would do this shit if society lets them. So fucked.

Please go take good care of yourself after transcribing this. This is the kind of stuff that affects talented health even in the strongest people.

For anyone who needs a palate cleanser after reading the article:

!cat@lemmy.world

!bats@lemmy.world

!opossums@lemmy.world

!foxnews@lemmy.sdf.org

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

reaction upon seeing fox news community name:

reaction upon clicking on it:

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It’s the only kind of “Fox News” allowed in the fediverse.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 81 points 3 weeks ago

It's even more fucked up when you take the context I to account. This article is making sidelong references to the movie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Baby_(1978_film) which was based on a true story of child rape and exploitation. So this "article" takes that context and I guess sides with the monsters? fucking hell.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 61 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Her torrid freshness became an underground legend among the talent set. Producers literally held their breaths, waiting for the remarkable Brooke Shields to reach a reasonable age of fuckability, not yet legal, but oh, so sweet. Welcome to the end of innocence, Brookie.

Multiple people had to okay that. How? HOW????

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

This is an unhinged paragraph about a 13 year old.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It really was the worst of times

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh this shit is still going on. There were people in the late 90s early 00s that were counting down the days when the Olsen twins would turn 18.

Would not surprise me one bit if there are websites dedicated other child celebrities.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And following them ... Emma Watson all throughout the Harry Potter series.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 49 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Kinda like this rich pedo culture only went into hiding recently, never died, and never lost influence among the money cult. I think I am going to learn more about pyrotechnics.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Every single religious and political and business leader of significance in the US either pedo'd with Epstein or covered up for him.

Joe Biden and Merrick Garland didn't just protect Trump from prosecution over the coup, they protected him from prosecution over THIS.

The two of them sat on Epstein every day for four years.

This evil is systemic to the point that it has taken over in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

It didn't go into hiding at all. None of the associates in the Epstein files seem to suffer any real consequences. They're all still doing sex parties at St. Barts on their oversized yachts full of teenage girls or snorting lines of coke at Miami Freak Parties hosted by CIA-connected cartel guys and their real estate magnet friends.

I think I am going to learn more about pyrotechnics.

Just fly a birthday balloon near a Texas airport and you can set off the worst disruption since 9/11.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 44 points 3 weeks ago

Today, it looks like the Brooke Shields situation was normal for the time, but I assure you that it wasn't. Plenty of people called out the behavior of those around her, and it led to the tighter restrictions on childhood sexual exploitation that we see today. There's a reason why Brooke Shields is pretty much a solo act - when Hollywood handlers tried to cross boundaries with her, they got slapped down pretty quickly, and nobody really followed.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I did some research (more than I should for this ancient trite) and this comes from February 1978 issue of High Times magazine. A fucking stoner magazine! What the hell was the writer of some second-rate publication for grass and shrooms doing writing a lust piece about an up-and-coming child actress? What kind of grass would make you want to fuck a child?

Hold on, it gets worse. According to Wikipedia, the article's writer, Ed Dwyer, was the magazine's founding editor. Imagine working at that magazine's office and reading your boss's 1970s equivalent of a horny post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 36 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Because 70's were WILD for that shit.

Should I remind you that street marches were held in the name of "adult-child love"? That NAMBLA, a North-American Man-Boy Love Association (you can't make this shit up) tried to meddle with LGBTQ+ to get included? That songs were written about teenage girls being taught "adult love"?

If anything, the article is characteristic of the time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

For people who weren’t around in the 70s and 80s trust me the sexism and sexual abuse back then was unreal!

How Shields was treated was not unusual at all.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 31 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

This is grim, but those of us born in the 80s will remember how absolutely obsessed the media was with Britney Spears becoming "legal" and reporting on her virginity every chance they got.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 23 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

UK newspapers would frequently publish photos of 16 years old girls with their tits out. That was only made illegal in 2004.

Back during Paedomania of the early 2000s, Brass Eye had an episode taking the piss out of the press's new found moral crusade, despite them happily being in on it for the better part of 30 years. The press did not like this at all. Unfortunately they didn't seem to realise they were at fault, which led to the memorable juxtaposition of an article about "perv spoof bosses" on the opposite side of the page from an article about how big 15 year old Charlotte Church's boobs were getting.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

We need a "wildly infuriating" community

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Apparently there is the !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world community, I just didn’t know about it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

her mom let her do a sexualized fully nude photoshoot when she was 10

[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its my fault for having internet today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

This isn't just sexualising children, this is sexual abuse of people. Nobody should be sexualised without their consent. It is a disgrace that this ever hapened to her; however, this thing is still happening around the world regardless of age.

The industries thrive on non consentual manipulation of people. Adults, teens and even children are driven deep into the trap that is abuse.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Correction on the in picture caption: she wasn't 13, she was 12. It says it in the article.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 weeks ago
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

She played the role of a prostitute in a movie and instead of the article being like “whoa this movie is pretty heavy - trigger warning” it’s all “damn she’s hot.”

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 24 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Makes you think America has a pedo problem. What a ridiculous notion.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is that a photo of a young Brooke Shields with Woody Allen directly above that horrific description?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember the trump child beauty pageants?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›