Greg

You've done your part to make the internet a little bit more distributed like it was always meant to be. Good work!

I would be happy for them and I'd respect their decision to keep their finances private if they wanted. I'd also be proud that they didn't feel the need to flaunt their wealth, that's a sign of a secure and well rounded individual.

The world is complex and the vast vast majority of people in the world are wonderful humans. The closest thing we have to super villains are people like Martin Shkreli, Jeffrey Epstein, Mark Zuckerberg, etc. and those kinds of folks only make up 0.01% of the world's population. If someone's actions appear to be evil then it's far more likely that you just don't understand their perspective. And you don't have to agree with someone's perspective to understand their perspective. For example, maybe someone is working for a defence contractor designing new missiles because they were personally affected by a terrorist attack. I can understand that perspective while also believing that better missiles won't reduce terrorism. I'm not excusing bad behaviour, I'm explaining why other people might not see their actions as bad behaviour and will have a clear conscience.

I like the big ears they put on this surveillance plane. It'll be able to hear the bad guys coming

lol, I can think Hitler and Trump are awful people AND point out stupid arguments. Stop making stupid arguments.

TIL people think Hitler invented the toothbrush moustache

Nice try Sam Altman

Realistically though, the Signal will stop being available in app stores. Once that happens my non technical friends and family will slowly lose access to Signal. And once it's unavailable to one person in a group chat, everyone in that group chat will need migrate to a Zuckerberg platform.

Please don't be silly Canada! I don't want to lose Signal, it took a lot of effort to get my family and friends to migrate from Zuckerberg owned messenger services.

Now put them in a singularity

By claiming the image was AI generated OP removed the artist from the work. Of course the image was going to be seen through a different lens. The artist is so closely coupled to the art we even use the artists name when describing an image, "it's a Monet", etc.

This answer just raises more question 🤔