What does it say about women speaking again?
I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.”
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
439 points (98.5% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
38366 readers
3143 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Paul probably didn't write that paragraph of verses. It was most likely added by someone else along the way.
To your point of people wanting to take only portions of the Bible literally and ignore others, there are TONS of things that the old testament says to do that we don't do every day.
A whole lot of the bible wasn't written by Paul. Doesn't mean its not part of the bible.
That sounds like a very feminine opinion
Christians on old testament laws:
-
prohibition on eating pork: god actually didn't mean we should stop eating pork. It was an accident bro.
-
prohibition on vaguely sexual acts without clear translation: this is the word of god, how dare these people exist
I'm not defending Christianity, but the actual defense of pork is that Jesus had made pork clean, in a vision to Peter where the analogy was that Jesus also made non Jewish people clean, since mixing with them was also forbidden. So less accident, more amendment.
They would also claim (from my experience in a cult anyway) that the old laws were necessary at the time they were given, but by the time Jesus came he could revise them as they were more ready.
If we look at it from a secular viewpoint, badly cooked pork probably caused a bunch of illness to was banned, and by the time Jesus supposedly existed people had learned to cook it more safely.
If only they took jesus' thousands of negative views on the wealthy as seriously as they take his one revision to pork law.
Nah, I can see Paul saying that, I just cannot see Jesus (who was openly kissing women like men kissed men and basically publicly recognising them as equals! The horror, lol) saying that. 🤷
Would you mind telling me which verse tells us jesus kissed women in greeting?
Nowhere, actually, I must have hallucinated it (?!). Perhaps in some apocryphal gospel? Religious fiction? Sorry for spreading misinformation, I really thought I read it.
Awesome, thanks for checking. It didn't sound familiar.
I'd have to go look but I think that was in the gospel of Philip. Apocryphal, but interesting.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Equally controversial fact:
I am not obliged by law or morality to follow what is written in your fucking book either way.
My version: I don't fucking care what your dumb book says.
I used to always reply with "i'm Jewish". They gear clashed like fucking crazy. It was hilarious.
Now i'm done even vaguely entertaining these shitheels
i used to use "i'm pagan" and watch the sparks fly but that's gonna get me killed one of these days
load more comments
(3 replies)
Didn't Mary and Joseph live together before they were married?
It was acceptable because Mary could do sick ollies at the half pipe
No, they just had a baby in a cave together and claimed it was a virgin birth.
Seriously though, I thought they were married?
I feel like if they were married it would have been expected that mary wasn't a virgin
They get married at some point after jesus is conceived, and have other children (opinion varies, catholics maintain that Mary remained a virgin)
So Jesus was a bastard?
load more comments
(2 replies)
I did a quick look, but tbh I would need to know more about ancient judaic wedding practices.
Here goes: in Gospel by Luke, when Mary gets the announcement, they are betrothed (fiancée).
In Gospel by Matthew, Joseph hears of this and wants to cancel the betrothement, but gets an explanation by an angel and "takes her in" but doesn't sleep with her until after Jesus is born.
In Gospel by Luke, when they arrive in Bethlehem, they're called betrothed. So I don't know how official and extensive the "taking in" is to be seen.
Anyways, look what I found in the Song of Mary:
He performs mighty deeds with his arm; he scatters those who are proud in their inmost thoughts.
He brings down rulers from their thrones but lifts up the humble.
He fills the hungry with good things but sends the rich away empty.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Did God marry Mary, before he knocked her up?
No, but in his defense, neither did he live with her.
Incorrect. He lives inside all of us! HE'S INSIDE OF YOU RIGHT NOW!!
I hope y'all's god likes pörkölt because that's what she's getting
load more comments
(2 replies)
Some really unfortunate power dynamics in that relationship.
What should be controversial is pretending a goat shepherds religious book from the bronze age should have any kind of authority in the 21st century.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Every time I hear the word bible and fact in the same sentence the church bells start ringing in my head.
Outside the Ten Commandments (supposedly), the Bible was written entirely by fallible humans - these assholes keep forgetting that part & act like it's 100% perfect (which we know it's not simply by its own self-contradictions).
It is also important to not forget about how the Bible was formed.
What we know as the Bible is a collection of books, selected by a committee during a conclave centuries ago.
Any decision made by humans in power and influence will inevitably be favoring their own goals and politics.
There are plenty of other Christian texts that were excluded, how would they have changed Christianity if they were included?
load more comments
(3 replies)
Excuse me but old baldy Elisha successfully cast summon shebear swarm and I posit any being able to summon and command not just a shebear but a swarm of shebears just might be infallible
load more comments
(2 replies)
Also somehow the King James version is authoritative, after who knows how many links of translation phone games?
The Ten Commandments, famous for being identical and consistent across varying versions of religious scripture and sections within the same!
There are so many books. It is strange that this one gets so much attention.
Controversial fact: Gondor does in fact call for aid.
But it's a Good Book don't ya know! If you just read one book it should be a Good Book.
Unexpected Tim Minchin
Thou shalt boof but not before 3 days after the sabbath. So it is written
Society changed a lot since Biblical times. They didn't "live together" in the same house, but these people certainly "lived together" in the same street or village before getting married. People didn't really have a lot of "home life" like we do now, they'd be out in the fields, or cooking in front of their home. So they'd see each other's home life and it's more "getting a house for themselves" than a big change in privacy or contact hours.
It isn't accurate anyway, the Bible certainly supports living together with people while not married in certain situations, for example with (sex) slaves.
The Bible is very contradictory because it's a collection of books written throughout millennia, usually with prophets saying A and judges and scholars saying B (and people usually following B).
And I see Stanzi is on her Madonna-styled Trinitarian rebellion, lol. I love her content, hopefully she's not doing too many bumps!
Stanzi is fucking hilarious.
They usually had a communal bed back then where everyone slepped on the same family bed together... Kids, gramma, sister and her boyfriend going at it, the wife and the husband going at it.
Very biblical.
view more: next ›