this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
222 points (91.4% liked)

politics

28130 readers
2386 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 minutes ago

When is the revolution you all needed your guns for?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 19 hours ago

It's extra funny because I knew a Mexican American guy around the first Trump term who didn't care that Trump was racist because Republicans are pro-gun. I wonder how all that's working out for him. Not enough to look him up, but enough to laugh at his stubborn stupidity.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago

The Right Wing are remaining loyal to their only real value: loyalty and obedience to authority

[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is a deeply misleading headline

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

It's 100% weapon's grade clickbait.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 19 hours ago

Of course it is. News hasn't EVER been able to make headlines not be over the top, all the way back to the days of the Gutenberg printing press

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I fundamentally disagree. The fact that it still exists on paper is immaterial if you cannot safely exercise the right.

[–] CascadiaRo@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

There are plenty of other forms of phrasing to communicate that though.

Well, the headline is an outright lie, not just misleading. But the point about the Democrats not screeching about this from every corner is a good one.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

For the MAGAs keeping score at home:

  • America First, no foreign entanglements. Yeah, tell it to Venezuela, Greenland, Iran, Gaza, Canada, Mexico, etc.

  • Lower Prices on Day One - Still rising on Day 365

  • Release the Epstein Files - except the really good stuff of course. Unless it exposes the nasty "victims," who were just slutty 13 year olds.

  • Protect the 2nd Amendment, unless, y'know, you want to actually carry your gun the way the Constitution and SCOTUS allows. Can't be doing that. Soon they'll just take them away, but it will be okay if MAGA does it, right?

So with all your precious MAGA promises being broken, why are you still in? The open corruption? The open treason? The virtuosic incompetence? The paramilitary Death Squads murdering innocent American citizens in spontaneous firing squads? The humiliating daily court losses for their all important retaliatory prosecutions? The embarrassing public statements multiple times a day? The frenzied hours long manic posting of racist memes? The shitting his pants during press conferences?

I'll bet it's the Pedophilia. The one thing that MAGA can be absolutely counted on is to cover for Pedophilia. Hiding it is LITERALLY their most important job, and they are ALL on board with that objective

That's why ALL MAGAs are Pedophiles.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Spot on! Add Racism to your list.

[–] spacebread98@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

At this point I am waiting for him to switch everything to the metric system

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Here in Canada we have three major parties and a few minor ones. A decade or more ago ago our three major parties could be described as progressive, centerist, and conservative. These days they can be referree to as progressive, conservative/center-right, and far-right.

How many people do you suppose switched from the Conservitives to the Liberals, from the originally conservative to the now conservative/center-right, in more recent years as the parties changed their alignment and began representing different people? Next to fucking no one. Most originally Conservative voters, if they genuinely believed in what they were saying, should be voting Liberal right now as that party now aligns with their supposed views more closely. Liberals, likewise, only care about voting for the party that puts itself between the two options on either side, calling anyone to the right or left “extreme” or “idealists” no matter what their positions actually are and so it’s difficult to get them to actually make real change.

The moral of this story is that MAGA voters are voting based on following their tribe around and they are completely locked into branding and stereotypes. They believe anything they’re told because they want to align themselves with an image, not vote for a representative. The more this shit goes on the more I think the world needs to ban the idea of political parties so that voters have to actually listen to the campaign promises of candidates.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 hours ago

Conservatism is exclusively about in-group. Everything else is a post-hoc justification. They're just less, I don't know, morally developed. Like children.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

That will most likely be the evolution. Parties just divide people. Sure it is a way to unite but they are too deeply entrenched in the worst ways

We definitely to give what you said a go everywhere

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Some cities have non-partisan elections for offices like mayor. It seems like that would be a good thing, but it's really because some cities are so partisan, it can be hard to come up with a candidate from the opposing party. By making it non-partisan, they can offer more than one candidate, even if they are both from the same party.

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He doesn't have the power to abolish 2a, he just has the ability to tell his DOJ to not investigate matters when his administration's agents violate it. This constitutes a massive abuse of executive power, fostering a culture of impunity and abuse but we all should understand that if and when executive and legislative power fall out of the hands of this admin, these sorts of crime have very long statutes of limitations and accountability (if belated) is entirely in the cards

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

FYI - nothing happened

[–] Azal@pawb.social 54 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My dad has been saying that the Republicans were going to be the ones taking guns when people go on about "gun grabbing democrats" since Reagan apparently. I was only long enough to hear him say that around Bush era onward but this is my shocked face that he was right.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I fully agree with your father and I've been saying the same thing since the 2001 Patriot Act and when the Orange Kool-Aid guzzlers won in 2016. Those fucks will eventually abolish 2A for the full power grab.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 129 points 2 days ago (6 children)

« Harris will comes for your guns » -MAGA

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Dems campaigned on restricting gun ownership broadly.

Republicans campaigned on restricting civil liberties for liberals specifically.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I'm pro 2A and a lot of my 2A buddies knew damn well Harris wasn't coming after our guns because she was just going to continue what Biden was doing which was pretty much nothing.

Trump on the other hand has repeatedly lied about his stance on 2A, moved to ban accessories and certain firearms and at one point the ATF had the longest wait times under his first admin. The wait times are nearly non-existent but there are some who argue that is thanks to Biden.

And for those who claim that the "Gun Personality" people voted for Trump, I can tell you from first hand experience those gun nuts did not vote for Trump. It was the faux 2A who go to the range for a photoshoot and buy the Gucci gear who voted for Trump.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It was the faux 2A who go to the range for a photoshoot and buy the Gucci gear who voted for Trump.

I am FINALLY starting to see some guntubers start to call this shit out, and call attention to the fact that their community is getting overrun with people who don't actually care about proper gun safety and laws, and are only there for the politics and "masculinity" around having guns.

I hope this continues. I was first to speak up that we needed better gun laws in the US, but I also am a gun owner and have always been really disappointed how guns became a political issue and not a guarantee that these political issues don't overpower us and take away all our rights.

The left needs to arm the fuck up. Political capital comes from force and patriotism, it's a fucking shame the worst people have taken our most powerful tools for change in the US and used them to get us here.

The vast swaths of liberal America look at two sides, the right kissing the flag and promising to defend the country with their lives, and then they look to the left, spitting on the flag and demanding de-armement, and they make a choice which makes them feel safer. It's utterly stupid that they have this binary vision, but we have to understand how power comes from this perception, and we don't win without power.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Add two more factors. The fucking Russian and Chinese mobile phones responding on social media.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hope to see you and your other 2A friends out in the streets. The folks I know are trying to catch up, but gun safety and marksmanship are slow skills to build, and we could use some support from the folks with the know-how.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 12 hours ago

Where I am, everyone on the street is carrying but you won't see it. We have constitutional concealed carry and even 60% of the little old ladies I know have one in their purse, and that's just what I know of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 days ago (25 children)

I thought that was hilarious given that she is known to carry and be proficient with a pistol, and Trump has never held a gun in his life.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 91 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The US Attorney basically said no gun carry in Washington DC.

TLDR-

This syndrome reached an apotheosis of sorts when Jeanine Pirro, best known as a reality TV judge and right-wing blowhard, and now (because of course!) appointed by Trump as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, issued this edict: if anyone brings “a gun into the District, you mark my words, you’re going to jail. I don’t care if you have a license in another district and I don’t care if you’re a law-abiding gun owner somewhere else.”

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 29 points 1 day ago

That article was so long to bury that.

[–] cmeu@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Amending the constitution requires a super majority... Not a deranged despot.

He doesn't get to decide which parts of the Constitution are in force or not.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

At the executive level, he gets to decide how the federal policing departments interpret statute and execute their department objectives.

In the modern era, that means taking a reading of "gun possession" as "physical threat to police" and permitting the police to respond to anyone they think might be carrying with lethal force. That's not a repeal of the 2nd amendment in a literal sense. But it does make open carrying extremely dangerous in practice.

Of course, this isn't news to everyone.

Being a Black gun owner in the US comes with a unique set of challenges. The Second Amendment is often not applied to Black gun owners in the same way it is applied to white gun owners. Lawfully armed Black people are often viewed as a threat and met with police violence, in part because of implicit bias that law enforcement is not immune to.

Philando Castille was a registered gun owner in St. Paul, Minnesota, who was shot and killed by police in front of his girlfriend and her daughter, after disclosing that he was armed. Alton Sterling, who was killed by police officers in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, was legally armed at the time of his death. Black Americans are disproportionately murdered or injured by police and Black gun owners describe being stereotyped and misperceived by law enforcement.

What we have is a white population that's catching up to the treatment enjoyed by minorities for decades.

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 day ago

Yes he does, because you're not fucking doing anything about it. You can say "That's illegal!" like it's a magic spell all you want, but Trump doesn't care what is legal. Either you go stop him, physically, or he will keep doing whatever he feels like.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

Yet federal officers follow his orders. No one enforces the constitution, even if the courts back it up, and they will find a way not to.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

So is anyone stopping him or are people just claiming that he can't do that while he's doing it.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

So you look at Trump, his goons, his record and you say: "That good ol' piece of paper is going to defeat facism." ?

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago

Every republican accusation has always been a confession. Their base will parrot whatever talking point they’re given with dead eyes

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 days ago

Historically every major piece of gun legislation has come from Republicans

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

One abiding characteristic of the right-wing personality is that when he is not dominating others, he feels persecuted. That explains LaPierre’s outbursts in the 1990s just as it explains the lies that Trump, Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller, et al., require to rationalize their abandonment of a conservative shibboleth now that they are in power.

They all live behind military walls is another abiding characteristic.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/03/jeanine-pirro-second-amendment-washington-00762347

It happened a few days ago and she walked the comments back within 24 hours, apparently.

John Commerford, executive director of the National Rifle Association’s legislative arm, said Pirro’s remarks “highlight the need for Congress to pass H.R. 38, the National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act.” That bill, introduced last year by Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), would allow anyone with a state-issued concealed carry license to carry a firearm in any other state.

The cynic in me says it’s staged to drum up support for this deranged bill.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›