this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
217 points (99.1% liked)

politics

28130 readers
2082 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Federal prosecutors had a warrant to collect evidence from Ms. Good’s vehicle, but Trump administration leaders said to drop it. About a dozen prosecutors have departed, leaving the Minnesota U.S. attorney’s office in turmoil.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If I got that phone call, I would just say "eat a dick" and hang up. What are you gonna do? Tell everyone you tried to prevent justice?

[–] homes@piefed.world 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If I got that call, I would say, “I understand,” and then hang up.

Then I would go onto national news and tell them to “eat a dick“ while I told the world what they asked me to do.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, no, the better thing is apparently to quit and do nothing. They ALL keep doing it.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If my job asked me to start doing unimaginably horrible s*** I would quit too.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good now you can be replaced with a maga loyalist.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that's the point. MAGA loyalists are mediocre lawyers at best, and without exception they end up costing the regime far more than they win.

For example, when the actual Virginia AG quit rather than prosecute James Comey and Letitia James as political retribution, the replacement was so bad that the situation ended up getting both cases thrown out and the replacement MAGA loyalist too. It was a total fail for the regime.

So more power to these guys, I say. I can't think of a better way for these prosecutors to shoot the regime in the foot than to walk out and take their expertise with them. The replacement hacks in general do not win, and just the walkout alone will likely stymie anything else the regime wants to do with it, like investigate Renee Good's wife.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

And nothing else, like go public with exactly what you were asked and who? Just quit?

[–] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean, it's great that they left their posts to protect their own integrity. Bravo.

Where is the fight though? Why aren't these people going out and telling the world that this administration is corrupting the rule of law?

They have the information. They can tell the world exactly what they're doing over there. They've seen it. Yet none of them come forward.

For an administration like this to succeed in what they're doing it also takes a massive lack of action from those that could stop it or speak out against it.

All I see are cowards interested in themselves. If they really wanted to have any integrity they would be in front of the cameras, together, telling the whole world exactly what happened.

But they're not.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the very existence of this article is because of exactly what you're saying they're not doing. Just because they don't go in the talk show circuit and try to make a name for themselves doesn't mean that they aren't quietly working with reporters to unravel this case in the background

[–] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's a very valid point.

I would reply though that the article is quite vague on specifics.

They could be providing verbal testimony to exactly what happened and how it happened. This piece feels like it's vague enough for the administration to just outright deny.

If they, as a group, stood together and said "this is exactly what we saw and this is why it is terrifying" it would have far more weight than an article in a newspaper, even if it is the NYT.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're career civil servants. They understand how to make change on small significant ways that are not all about the limelight. They are the opposite of politicians.

[–] HamFistedVegan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I get that. It does make sense. Do you know how exactly they are trying to affevt change then? Do you believe they're working behind the scenes? Just wondering if that's an assumption or you know something.

It's a gross injustice. The administration is basically subverting the rule of law and these people know that. Every US citizen should be aware of what they are doing. It's the behaviour of an authoritarian regime, not a democracy.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Send the Gestapo to disappear you in the middle of the night, maybe...

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, much better to say nothing and let them keep doing that to all the brown people because they're not as important as the whites

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

"These people attempted to defy our New God, Donald Trump. Praise Him!"

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago

Literally and figuratively

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they are leaving and giving the room to the nazis, instead of staying and fighting, they are part of the problem, right?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Staying and fighting just means you get fired a few hours later.

[–] ThisUsernameKillsFascists@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But if the evidence needed to properly prosecute the killers gets collected in that time, isn’t that better?

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If people in government were more tech literate and willing to stand by their morals by whistleblowing, they would create a torrent of the encrypted evidence and set up a dead man's switch for the key.

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What evidence is needed? Just have some eyewitness testimony and send it out to the jury.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 days ago

Normally stuff like spent bullets, comparing marks on them with the shooter's gun, showing that the bullet holes in the car came from the direction of the shooter, and not from some other cop. Really basic forensic evidence to make it clear that there wasn't another shooter off-camera.

They chose to discard that evidence