217
Prosecutors Began Investigating Renee Good’s Killing. Washington Told Them to Stop.
(www.nytimes.com)
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
217 points (99.1% liked)
politics
28130 readers
2001 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean, it's great that they left their posts to protect their own integrity. Bravo.
Where is the fight though? Why aren't these people going out and telling the world that this administration is corrupting the rule of law?
They have the information. They can tell the world exactly what they're doing over there. They've seen it. Yet none of them come forward.
For an administration like this to succeed in what they're doing it also takes a massive lack of action from those that could stop it or speak out against it.
All I see are cowards interested in themselves. If they really wanted to have any integrity they would be in front of the cameras, together, telling the whole world exactly what happened.
But they're not.
I think the very existence of this article is because of exactly what you're saying they're not doing. Just because they don't go in the talk show circuit and try to make a name for themselves doesn't mean that they aren't quietly working with reporters to unravel this case in the background
That's a very valid point.
I would reply though that the article is quite vague on specifics.
They could be providing verbal testimony to exactly what happened and how it happened. This piece feels like it's vague enough for the administration to just outright deny.
If they, as a group, stood together and said "this is exactly what we saw and this is why it is terrifying" it would have far more weight than an article in a newspaper, even if it is the NYT.
They're career civil servants. They understand how to make change on small significant ways that are not all about the limelight. They are the opposite of politicians.
I get that. It does make sense. Do you know how exactly they are trying to affevt change then? Do you believe they're working behind the scenes? Just wondering if that's an assumption or you know something.
It's a gross injustice. The administration is basically subverting the rule of law and these people know that. Every US citizen should be aware of what they are doing. It's the behaviour of an authoritarian regime, not a democracy.