this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
185 points (98.9% liked)

News

35364 readers
2408 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every Homeland Security officer on the ground in Minneapolis, including those from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, will be immediately issued body-worn cameras, Secretary Kristi Noem said Monday, in the latest fallout after the shooting deaths of two U.S. citizens at the hands of federal agents.

The news of the body cameras comes as Minneapolis has been the site of intense scrutiny over the conduct of federal officers after two U.S. citizens protesting immigration enforcement activities in the city were shot and killed.

It is the latest effort by the Trump administration to alleviate tensions after the shootings and show it is responding to calls for accountability.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

The problem is that even confirmed abuse does not get prosecuted. Adding more evidence won't help.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Will they be held responsible if they "forgot to switched it on" or "left it in the office" or "accidentally deleted that file"?

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 115 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Are they going to turn the cameras on?

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 84 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You already know they won’t, and even if they do, a malfunction will always be the reason the footage was lost, unless it helps them track and arrest protestors.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They will wear them, they will have them on. When they murder people, we will see. However, just like now, nothing will happen. And, I think this will lead to more staged executions like Pretti. They will just be slightly better actors.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I fully expect that they will release ai-doctored body cam footage

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

Look at this ICE officer handing out roses to black people.

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 15 points 3 days ago

Oh THAT I would believe. And it will be crazy obvious, yet they will deny it.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 8 points 2 days ago

Even if, what does it even matter? Multiple people filmed how they executed people and it didn't matter

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 2 days ago

Are people really still confused about this? Police loves body cams. Body cams make it easier for them to prosecute people and let them gather intel on protesters. If by accident body cam records something inconvenient they just hide the footage. Body cams are for surveillance, not accountability.

So yes, they will turn them on and they will stream all the footage to Palantir.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

or the video footage not being withheld from the public?

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 14 points 3 days ago

Depends on whose agenda it helps.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I doubt they will even wear them

They all have Grok AI integrated to ensure that they're Always On™ and that all of the totally real and accurate details of the violent antifa rioters brandishing their automatic assault pistols are enhanced to perfect, crystal-clear HD

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 71 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The problem isn't lack of evidence, it's lack of accountability and consequences. Adding another camera on the scene doesn't fix the issue.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This assholes won't actually use them correctly and conveniently "lose" the footage when needed, but generally having more cameras does actually help.

Yes the hard part of accountability is the elephant in the room, but I'm just saying, more cameras is always better than less.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We agree, I'm not against more cameras. I just don't see it changing anything when they'd already voluntarily pull out their personal device to record themselves killing someone.

[–] hoppolito@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Comprehensive reviews of body cam usage already put into question the overall efficacy of body cameras (https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12412 is the one I see cited most often, not sure if there are newer systematic reviews).

And that one also comes to the conclusion, especially regarding effects on use-of-force:

Ariel et al. (2016a) recently provided one nuanced explanation to these mixed findings. They discovered that when officers have more discretion in turning on their cameras, they tend to exhibit greater uses of force than officers who have less discretion regarding their BWCs [Body-worn Cameras]. In most of the use-of-force studies reviewed earlier, researchers did not track activation and therefore it was not clear to what extent Ariel et al.’s nuance is salient. If activation is related to use of force in these ways, however, consistently training, reinforcing, and supervising the implementation of mandatory policies may be needed to secure a positive effect of BWCs on reported uses of force

That, combined with the seemingly more gung-ho internal processes in DHS/ICE, also leads me to believe in few positive outcomes here -- especially with the 'editorial monopoly' in institutional hands.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Oh good this will be much better now that these crimes will be heavily recorded. The problem before is we didn't have multiple angles of the crime recorded or something like a cell phone recording by the ICE agent.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haha, will they be turned on? That's a rhetorical question, don't answer.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

If it supports their side of the story it will be

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago

Who cares, we’ve already seen video of them shooting people for less than good reason and not a fucking thing happened

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's great! They'd never murder someone on camera!

[–] mitkase@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

“Does this AR-15 make my ass look fat?”

[–] wilt@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

-Dons tinfoil hat-

What if this policy is used to gather visual data to train an AI model to generate false attacks on ICE in one calm area to justify escalation in another hot area?

This would give them free rein to attack a peaceful neighbourhood based on the AI false flag attack and to escalate tensions between peaceful protestors in another part of the city / country.

I thought that's what they were already doing. They have been caught posting edited images already.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

With an off switch, no doubt.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Don't care. Fuck you. Go to prison.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Back in the Naughties, I thought this approach would matter, would rein in police abuse.

I didn't understand that police violence and mendacity were systemic, cultural problems, not evidentiary ones.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 days ago

It would work if the cops weren't able to turn them off and the footage was uploaded to servers not owned by the PD.

[–] digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago

Really leaning into their snuff films now instead of looking for public views.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

....and other stupid lies only brain dead bootlickers belive.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Put a QR code on their backs too. And take their damn masks off.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Tell them? They should be fired, prosecuted and no longer eligible for any government jobs for violating the constitution.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Body cameras are not to protect the people and are not about accountability. Unmask them all. We will need their identities when we get to the end of all this.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Narrator "they turned the cameras off"

Because, you know, we don't want the cameras to always be on. What if something happened and they need to shoot a sassy mom in the face for driving at less than 5 mile per hour?

Happens every day, that is why our agents fear for their lives. Have YOU ever seen a car going 5 miles an hour? I doubt it, hippy

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Now they got two hands for killing us. Hands free mode.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And coincidentally all the cameras are broken.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

You'd think with a budget of billions that they'd be able to afford reliable cameras that don't malfunction at inopportune times.

But of course, that obvious thought would never occur to their supporters.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Solar powered.

[–] gravitas@lem.ugh.im 3 points 3 days ago

Dems are gonna call this a huge victory.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Now more than ever, people need to be out on the streets, documenting everything these fucks do. Get it on video, from every possible angle. Don't let them control the narrative.