Traffic restrictions will promote getting where the fuck you want to be on any sort of schedule
A true Orwellian dystopia
this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
424 points (99.1% liked)
Fuck Cars
14419 readers
691 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Today you can walk to the shops.
Tomorrow you're in a Siberian gulag.
Slippery fucking slope.
When they argue in bad faith, they’ll say anything and never waver from it to further their agenda.
Oh, look. The Torygraph.
"every opinion different than mine is stalinist!" said the chugs with their mouths full of mcnuggets and cheap beer.
Don't drag cheap beer into this!
Expensive beer is Stalinist
There's a conspiracy theory that what 15 minute cities secretly means is that you'll be confined in a sector of the city and unable to leave without a permit or something.
Why anyone would think that, no idea!
I don't think it makes any logical sense. It doesn't need to, because that's not the point.
Repeat the buzzwords (15 minute cities, WEF, replacement theory, etc) on Facebook or Twitter and the lunatic followers/bots will magically appear to follow, like and subscribe you up the social media pages.
Possibly because that’s actually what the fascists want.
In car-centric American cities however, that would be impossible. You can't just block the single street that leads out of the neighborhood!
Oh, wait.
Authoritarians are poor at distinguising "is allowed to" from "is forced to." This is also why they hate gay people-- they think that if someone else is allowed to be gay, that'll mean that everyone will be compelled to.
The reality is that they fear freedom. They like the taste of boot.
Yeah because in their dreams girls should be compelled to have sex with them, so it's a kind of twisted but understandable logic I guess.
And why would a bunch of never-left-their-staters even care in the first place? They clearly don't want freedom of movement
Why anyone would think that, no idea!
Because that's what Republicans would do, obviously.
Or like, why do they think this couldn't happen in a city with cars?
They can just block the roads and cars are worthless.
Oh no, imagine life being convenient
It's horrible. I've had to give up my beloved 90-minute commute, and if I want something from a shop, I have to got off my lazy arse and spend a couple of minutes walking over there, instead of wasting 20 minutes each way driving to some nightmarish big-box retail hellhole in the outskirts of the city.
And let's not even talk about the clean air and nearly complete absence of road-raging premature-ejaculator drivers speeding along the city streets.
You seem to have skipped over the part where there’s no job at all without that commute
Does this also come with universal health care, free education, 100% emoloyment, and housing as a right? If not, it's not very Stalinist.
This is the UK, so we do actually have the NHS which is free at point of use for all citizens, provided you can wait the wait times, free primary and secondary education and university that costs £10k per year, and council housing for those who can't access housing in any other way. That's three out of four, at least.
You just need to re-open the coal mines to get the 100% employment.
Please no
Yesterday I headed out from the apartment for errands. I walked a total of about 8 blocks. I completed:
- A haircut
- Shopping for some house items
- Post office for mailing a letter and stamps
- Stopped to listen to some live music in a market hall
- Talked with a local community group about tech stuff
- Visited a library
- Hit up the bank ATM
- Snagged a couple bags of groceries
Total time: about 115 minutes
I LOVE living in a walkable neighborhood. Fuck car-only life. If you want it, fine, but don't demand that we all live in your apocalyptic transportation hellscape.
I could have done all thos trips in 40 minutes with my car, if we ignore the time in traffic, the time fueling it, the time waiting for oil changes, and the time spent earning the money to pay for the car, the gas, and the insurance.
You also left out finding parking and then walking through spectacularly scenic parking lots to and from each destination's front door. With bigger malls/box stores you'd walk further than I did going around the block just having to cross the parking lot.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Don't forget all that energy you saved by not walking anywhere. You paid good money for those calories and you're going to hold on to them for dear life.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's Stalinist to want to cut down on car dependency and actually have a livable place.
- Say the NIMBYs.
Really, the one thing we need to do is reduce car dependency to where you don't have to drive everywhere, and make it to where driving is completely optional at the very least.
This is the Telegraph talking about Labour government plans. Of course they would present it like that.
I personally think the better way is to make people realize themselves that not driving is the better option. Linking omnipresent cameras with driver databases to implement a vague system of fines administered by the councils does not instill me with enough confidence either. I see contested fines clogging up courtrooms (or whatever legal recourse there must be) for years.
Raise parking fees, reduce parking spaces - at a relatively slow rate to keep predictable outrage local and small enough. Implement a system where every car purchase needs to be accompanied by a proof of parking like in Japan (owned driveway or rented spot). Invest in public transport and infrastructure for pedestrians and bicyclists. Tax breaks for infrastructure that's missing (a supermarket, a clinic, a theater, etc.). That would make more sense to me than the threat of punishment through this somewhat Orwellian system.
East Germany was an authoritarian state without rule of law. This can be true at the time as the fact that in most cities they created neighborhoods that come close to this 15-min ideal. Childcare, multi disiplinary medical "poly clinics," and decent public transport. Sure, long lines at the grocery store and an 18 year waiting list to buy a shit car. But it strikes me as extremely dumb to ignore useful lessons from that out of cold war principle.
"[...] “perverse” and “Stalinist” approach to social control, adding: “It is an encroachment on civil liberties, and it is a page out of the East Germany playbook. With the 15-minute city, you will have to, in effect, apply for an internal passport to go and visit your granny."
That's nothing new. Fossil fuel funded desinformation and their not-less-desinformation-loving right-wing friends have a long history of telling the fairy tale of 15-min cities as a kind of population control.
It's all based on the basic premise that car-brains can't understand that "you cannot go there freely by car" is not the same as "you cannot go there freely at all". So when you tell them that you can only drive somewhere a limited number of times per year before paying a fee for using their car, their brain-damage automatically translates it to "I'm not allowed to go there anymore".
PS: Bringing the "East-German playbook" into this story makes it even more absurd, given the (non-)availability of cars and thus the quality of public transport in the ex-GDR. But that's another thing car-brains can't understand, so they will not see the problem.
It's called a train ticket and it should be subsidized too
Fuck the torygraph.
They clearly never been to Moscow, they would love it though, a car hellscape.
Eh, for all its faults Moscow has a fucking amazing metro+light rail system. All my friends who still live there aren't even thinking about buying cars, because why would they?
There's even a whole video game series about it!
Fair enough. But also still plenty of avenues that look like highways
As it happens, Russian cities saw huge sprawl during the USSR, though probably mostly starting in the sixties. As is usual, the pre-revolution city centre is twisty and cozy, while around it are radiating straight avenues for kilometres. So sorta the opposite of what the headline says.
Straight avenue is not necessarily a bad thing though, if they're high-density, walkable, full of services and green spaces, and interconnected with public transit, as they were.
view more: next ›