Sure, but at that point you can also just write assembly. I'm talking about "idiomatic" code in the language itself.
balsoft
Rust is fundamentally more limiting than C, even with unsafe
. It is often faster if you write naive code (because the Rust compiler can optimize more aggressively due to those same limitations), but an experienced developer with a lot of time for optimization will probably be able to squeeze more performance out of C than they would out of Rust - as you can see in this example. Rust is still better because those limitations all but guarantee that the resulting code will be safer, and the performance differences would be negligible all things considered.
I don't have any specific technical info. I just know that even 3 years ago the face recognition tech in Moscow could successfully match people even with sunglasses on.
I respectfully disagree -- fully automated luxury gay space communism or bust!
I wouldn't be so pessimistic. When more people personally experience survelliance abuse, things will get interesting.
Sunglasses alone are not enough either. Modern face recognition tech is way better than just distance ratios
Are there any AES countries without mass surveillance though? Honest quesion.
There is no effective technical solution for political problems. If you find one, it will soon be outlawed or rendered ineffective (eg if you wear mask and sunglasses, prepare to be harassed by law enforcement). Lobbying to stop unconstrained surveillance is the only option.
Did you read the article?
It's quite obviously :=
a.k.a ≔. Already used by Go and others.
I'm not gonna lie, I ate the meta-onion on this one
That's a bit ableist. Some people have issues with motor skills, or just a bad mouse that jumps all over the place. You have to make unnecessary stuff like this at least opt-out.