Wasn't this the main selling point of the cybertruck, almost verbatim?
balsoft
This is a really cool photo. Thanks for sharing!
Far from the worst shit to happen under capitalism, especially since it seems randomized in this case and not dependent on user's characteristics or history. Using discounts as a way to study consumer behavior has been happening since forever, and I'd argue it would be useful even under socialism. The only issue here is lack of transparency into the whole thing, but it could be trivially fixed by some legislation that requires a price history to be shown for every item, and personalized discounts be declared separately and in an easy-to-understand way. E.g. if this was clearly marked as "eggs are $4.50, but we are offering you a personal discount of $1" this story would seem like a nothing-burger.
To me, it's simple.
Crash out in the evening, be gone in the morning? A bed in a dormitory will do fine.
Stay for a few nights, go out every day to see the city/hike/etc? Gimme a cheap hotel room with a shared bathroom.
A longer stay for a workation/etc? Get a cheap apartment (at least a studio with a bathroom and a kitchen), because going out to eat fucking sucks.
Most jobs on the planet can't be done with WFH, because they require doing stuff with your hands.
The actual solution to traffic is: viable alternatives to driving, such as rapid, comfortable, accessible transit and cycling infrastructure. (once that's done, let's ban private cars in cities altogether, they're the worst thing to ever happen to cities).
While I agree with you that art will be there for as long as humans exist (since it's something a lot of us like to do), access to other's art might be severely diminished, especially in atomized societies.
Let's be real, for a lot of people, internet is the source for most of their art enjoyment. As more and more of the internet is filled with soulless AI slop, it might be more and more difficult to find real art here.
I also don't anticipate that AI will fully replace art on the internet - if you look hard enough, you will always be able to find niche communities of people doing their thing. E.g. I am quite fond of art communities here on lemmy, which seem to be mostly AI-free for now (since there's no monetary incentive to posting here).
But I can see how someone who loves art and finds all their life's meaning in it can be concerned with all the slop filling up mainstream artsy social media like instagram/pinterest/music streaming/etc.
It's categorically worse for privacy than signal. The latter is at least e2e encrypted. Probably also worse than WhatsApp, they also claim to be e2e encrypted, but it's less certain because the apps are closed-source.
You can use it as long as you consider all conversations on there, including direct messages, as public and readable by any three letter agency out there. Telegram is not e2e encrypted, which means Telegram LLC can read all your messages and share them as they see fit.
Also remember that they have your phone number and IP address
In short, planning a night out with friends is probably fine, coordinating a protest is probably not.
BTW this is also the case for most network printers. You can just print to them by sending a pdf/postscript file with netcat. CUPS is rarely needed nowadays.
In my experience:
- All printers are pain. This is a sad fact of computers.
- If it detects&gets recognized in CUPS, you can usually fiddle with it and make it work eventually.
- If it works on one distro, there will be some way to hack it enough for it to work on all distros.
F**k. You added two, so I have to censor one to keep the world balanced.
In the grand scheme of things:
So yeah, in that grand scheme of things, making models of the larger universe is not actually that important. First we need to make use of the discoveries made way over a century ago.