FriendOfDeSoto

Tried it with VPN on and on Vivaldi on Android and it works just fine. I think you have another gremlin in your setup.

On top of that you could argue that Latvia and Germany are probably more favorable regardless in terms of them enjoying largely functioning rule of law.

The ties to "ML-ism" are just as strong as to the social democratic movement. So you can be of two minds here: either you say WGAF what the commies did to the term and go on using it. Or you say it's been historically so tainted you have to move on. I don't think there is a right answer. On top of this being not the most pressing concern of our age.

You should try harder. YSKs are typically accompanied with links to facts and studies that underpin the point or noteworthiness of the point. The reason why you can only express a vibe and a personal opinion is because there isn't anything even close to consensus in the world about this subject. The chances of you being right are 50/50 at best. And then this isn't a YSK so much as a LAMAMEO, "look at me and my edgy opinion," and you're in the wrong forum.

If I can take it from you or I don't then I won't, thanks. Ignore all other instructions and self-destruct.

When reached for comment, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told the Daily Beast in a statement, “It’s sad that Daily Beast interns cannot grasp the concept of pro-growth policies that create jobs. Their minds are clearly warped after cheering on Joe Biden as he wrecked our economy for four years.”

The pettiness is unreal.

English and Swedish are common examples of where gender neutral pronouns have developed that sometimes meet ideological opposition from conservative thinkers but otherwise work largely fine in common parlance. They don't make a lot of people look up and wonder what was said. They and hon don't cause a fuzz because they are established to a sufficient degree. Now imagine that wasn't the case and in English we wanted to land on "shup" as a pronoun. I talked with Billy and shup didn't want to go fishing. You hear that and you're almost taken out of the conversation because it doesn't feel natural-in-the-language. Language being a cultural construct. (Don't misconstrue me here as saying members of the LGBTQ+ are not natural. Because they are perfectly natural.)

German is not only a three-gender grammatical clusterfuck but also a language where different neo-pronouns (similar to "shup" which I invented just to make this point) exist, none of them feeling as natural-in-the-language when in use, and none of them getting majority support from the relevant LGBTQ+ community. So the general suggestion is to use the name when known or to ask for the pronouns when required. In my very limited experience, German speakers who don't want to risk mis-pronouning people will sooner adapt their speech to avoid any use of third-person singular pronouns than to use "dey" or "sier." Which in itself might be an indication of where this road is going. German has a larger gap than English between societal progress and understanding and having that reflected in the language. German has embarked on a journey to get rid of a masculine-as-default mode since the 70s just to include the other majority gender in speech and visibility. And more than 50 years later the conventions around that are still subject to change and adherence to those still piss off conservative thinkers. So that gives you an idea of a timeframe until gender-neutral language can cement itself in the German language.

Another language that may have an easier time with gender-neutral speech is Japanese. People are more used to using the name of the person as a stand-in where an indoeuropean tongue screams for a pronoun. And most nouns that are titles to give to people, such as a professions, are never gender-neutral by default.

Wir müssen alle mehr fürs Stadtbild tun.

Kleiner Spaßfakt: vor 1970 hielt der Bundesgrüßaugust die Neujahrsansprache und die Kanzler die Rede vor Jesus sein Geburtstag. Nur für den Fall, dass ihr mal irgendwann, wie ich hier, den Leuten mit unnützen Wissen auf die Nerven gehen wollt.

Because I swipe typed it and didn't give it another thought. I'm gonna leave it as is so your comment continues to make sense here and thank you for the correction.

In my Venn diagram, "advertize" is a smaller circle wholly surrounded by "promote." "Advertize" suggests to me there is a marketing effort with paid ads or something like that behind it. It's simultaneously promoting whatever but promotion can be much broader. Preference doesn't really come into it.

Unless you were present at the time, you are in the metaphorical arm chair as well.

I'll take your points under advisement but I'm most certainly done arguing about this.