this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
769 points (99.4% liked)

News

34363 readers
3131 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UPDATE -- I found the original website and it's even better than we thought.

https://denmarkification.com/

Part 2 - This was started in Feb 2025 when tRump first proposed taking over Greenland.

https://apnews.com/article/denmark-greenland-california-75f1521f32871069e9840069e829e4dc

What began as a joke on social media has snowballed into one of the most talked-about political satire campaigns in Europe this year. More than 200,000 Danish citizens have now signed a viral petition proposing that Denmark buy the U.S. state of California, a tongue-in-cheek response to former U.S. President Donald Trump’s past interest in acquiring Greenland.

Under the fictional proposal, Californians would be welcomed into the Kingdom of Denmark with a package of benefits that reads like a parody of Nordic governance. The petition promises “rule of law, universal health care, and fact-based politics” as immediate perks of Danish administration.

To underscore the absurdity, the organizers also pledge a lifetime supply of Danish pastries for all 39 million residents of the state. The petition’s website jokingly notes that while Denmark cannot solve every problem, “we are very confident about pastries.”

The satirical plan goes further, outlining a full cultural “Denmarkification” of the West Coast. Los Angeles would be rechristened “Løs Ångeles,” while Danish-style cycling infrastructure would spread across cities more famous for traffic jams than bicycles.

Even California’s most iconic institutions are not spared. Disneyland would be rebranded as “Hans Christian Andersenland,” a nod to Denmark’s most famous storyteller, Hans Christian Andersen. The petition cheerfully asks readers to imagine fairy tales replacing cartoon mascots, and even suggests that Viking helmets might become standard park attire.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a package of benefits that reads like a parody of Nordic governance. The petition promises “rule of law, universal health care, and fact-based politics”

That’s not even a parody, just daily life in the nordics contrasted with the US.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

"Rule of law" and "fact-based politics" is just code for supporting existing power structures.

Turns out when you write the law, your rule is definitionally rule of law, and when you own the media, you get to determine what the facts are.

Both these concepts were used when the US sterilized mostly black women until... I think they're still doing it in some prisons, and when Denmark sterilized Inuits as recently as 2018.

[–] aleph@piefed.social 126 points 3 days ago (8 children)

As a spokesperson for CA citizens, we'll take it! Please and thank you.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 58 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Only if they take Washington and Oregon too.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a WA state resident, we require inclusion in the deal. In fact, you buy 1 California and receive a complimentary WA state for free! Act now, and receive a special-one-time Oregon while supplies last!

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If it were up to me Canada would buy us. I heard their getting China EVs soon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago

An overland route between Mexico and Canada that doesn't go through the US, that could be interesting.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Would you be fine if we just made you EU members instead of a state? That might make things less complicated. And would piss Trump off even more.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The Californian Republic would definitely have the most interesting flag in the EU. Too many tricolors, not enough bears.

[–] X@piefed.world 9 points 3 days ago

As a Washingtonian, yes please, and thank you for including us and Oregon. It is greatly appreciated!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gigachad@piefed.social 65 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think it's psychologically important for Denmark to own California

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why is it even part of the US? Just because some ships have been landed there? Well, danish has landed there too.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They should just sail a ship into Los Angeles and plant their flag.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

Mah, they should slop the photo with AI and say they did it

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago

It's psychologically important for me to, the change would be of immense psychological benefit to me.

[–] goombakid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Take the whole west coast. OR and WA are sick of this BS too. Hell, take HI as well!

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I, for one, welcome our new Danish overlords!

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can they buy Arkansas instead? We need a state government that respects the bodily autonomy of women, and I'd appreciate operating under Danish national law rather than a federal government run by Trump.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you we should be subjecting Denmark to the people of Arkansas

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As a "people of Arkansas", many of them aren't that bad, but just vote R for lower taxes. Their behavior can still be problematic, but they aren't intending to hurt anyone, even people they don't understand.

Now, some of them of monstrous religious zealots (often well-armed), and I wouldn't wish them on anyone, but I think the Danish system is just as well set up to deal with them and the American system.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

... We should not inflict armed religious zealots on Denmark. No matter how many of them "aren't bad people"

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

I think you misread me. The "aren't bad people" are wholly separate from the "armed religious zealots", tho both appear in Arkansas (and most states, including California and New York).

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All sales of California include a complementary Washington State, and yes, it's mandatory.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Oregon and Hawaii too

Don’t tempt us with a good time.

Also, can you take MA too? We have lots of neat bioscience stuff, tons of universities, and a similar dislike of orangeboi.

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would be inclined to listen to their trade offers of California. I would also offer Minnesota to Canada for a future draft pick.........

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Minimac@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

I should moving to Denmark because I’m part of Denmark so fuck America!!!!

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

Yup. Just saw articles from Feb 2025.

Good thing is they're up to 285k now!

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I was about to say, "past interest"!? How naïve the article writer was a year ago...

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Count me in for being absorbed by Denmark!

[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Hey listen: California is vital for Denmark's security, for some reason. Also, the Danish prime minister was snubbed for the Nobel Peace Prize, so that means that they're going to invade us if we don't comply with the sale.

[–] razen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I as an Asian support this deal. Please go ahead with it.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Texas or Florida would have been a much more appropriate choice. Trump doesn't even like California.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

No one wants to buy Florida.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 4 points 3 days ago

yea but I'm sure it's worth more than most states

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh damn, don't tease me with a good time. I'm not a rich man, but I'd make a donation to help pay for the purchase.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

I will gladly move to California ahead of the purchase.

Quite honestly Trump could tout this as a win. Huge buyout and they get rid of a bunch of uppity liberals.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure about the countries and what they do. Is Norway running Denmark? Will this finally get trump the Holland Peace Prize? /s

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago

Canada wants to buy Minnesota. They seem like our kind of people.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Frankly, I'd like to move to Denmark or Greenland, but they'd probably be understandably suspicious of me.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

California is one of the few states (most) Americans would not want to give up.

How about some of the Deep South?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What will you pay us to take it?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I guess Alabama would be really expensive for us to pay you to take. Maybe Florida?

Alabama residents receive over $60 billion from the federal government—23% of all personal income.

These payments, known as transfer payments, include Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, veteran’s benefits, unemployment, Pell Grants, and others.* The report explains how an aging population and shrinking economic opportunities have shifted many communities into reliance on these transfer payments.

To put the $60 billion in perspective, Alabama’s four automakers generate $6.4 billion in total compensation, according to a report from Autos Drive America and the American International Automobile Dealers Association, as reported by al.com. That’s about one-tenth of the amount received from federal transfer payments.

In other words, a 10% reduction in these payments would have a similar economic effect on personal income as shuttering Alabama’s entire auto industry.

https://parcalabama.org/alabamas-60-billion-question/

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Alabama residents receive over $60 billion from the federal government—23% of all personal income.

This trend infuriates me to no end. It's one thing to subsidize underperforming states, but the fucking attitude these people have about "welfare" when their state literally would not exist without it in one form or another is just the worst. 1/4 of all personal income comes from other taxpayers in other states. The ultimate welfare program.

Not just Alabama, every southern "taker" state. I wish we could cut them off for a year to shut them the fuck up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Apparently I need to move to California.

load more comments
view more: next ›