232
ha, yeah, no grooming going on under the guise of theology education here folks... no sir. move along
And yet I think it's more the 'marriage' part the Church cares more about. They DGAF about priests raping altar boys but as soon as one gets married that's when the real punishments kick in.
Shows you where their priorities are.
So let me get this straight. Get caught fucking a ten year old boy = church covers it up and you keep your priesthood. Marry an adult woman = lose your priesthood? What?
Yes,
Though I will point out that adult woman was likely being groomed while she was a child.
Yeah probably. But my point is the church doesn’t generally care about that part.
She turned 18 in June, and they left to Italy together in July.
You think he met her the same month she turned 18 and then they fell madly in love and fled the country a month later?
Or is it more likely he had been manipulating and grooming a child at the school he used to visit as a priest?
Yes but I don’t think that’s why the church is removing his priesthood. I don’t think they’re allowed to get married.
They didn't get caught.. they confessed and you can't act on a confession..
Though the rule is being changed to fix this loophole
That’s a bullshit rule that the church is using to supersede the law and enables child abuse. Everyone who knows and helps cover it up is complicit and it should be conspiracy to commit child abuse at the very least.
Religious dogma should NEVER be above the law.
The Catholic church is self-governed by Canon Law - its own law that's been around since the collapse of the Roman Empire. For a good portion of this time, Canon Law superseded national laws that applied to people who weren't priests. I think the church still privately believes that only Canon Law matters, and they can basically ignore everyone else. That's why they have protected child abusers, rapists and all other kinds of shit their medieval claptrap says isn't important. They are a bunch of arrogant pricks who believe themselves better than, you know, people who don't abuse those with less power.
Yes, exactly. This guy gets it.
Which is why the rule is being abandoned
Dude, I think it’s a little fucking late to get credit for abandoning this rule, which they have yet to actually even abandon and is probably being used to protect pedophiles AS WE SPEAK.
Naw, Pope Francis is cracking down
The mistake was getting married.
Wait... so priests can get married and they only stop being priests if you take it up directly with the Vatican?
It's not like the Catholic church exactly condones pedophilia and rampant sexual abuse, but look how extensively it permeates the institution.
When wondering "Would the Catholic church really do X?" I find the best practice is to instead ask myself: "Does the pope shit in the woods?"
I prefer the alternative "does the Pope's dick fit in a donut?"
Wouldn't that highly depend on the diameter of the donut hole?
It’s hard to make a donuts too small.
There used to be a place here that sold you four tiny "gourmet" donuts for way too much money. Unsurprisingly, it lasted about a month and a half. I think even the smallest dick could fit through those donut holes.
I don’t know?
My personal favorite is, "does the Pope shit in his hat?"
It's a bureaucracy
It's not like the catholic church is full of the virtue they espouse
So the church is mad that he's still with her after she turned 18? Because we don;t see this kind of hubbub when its small children.
The church is mad that they made it official and got married. And yes the church is fucked
defrocked
"They can't help themselves, can they?"
- Jimmy Carr
he should be raped and murdered in prison.
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
232 points (97.2% liked)
News
23024 readers
3404 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS