this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
192 points (94.0% liked)

Risa

8076 readers
171 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Did anybody promted data to do it?

or data did that on their own?

Data is not an LLM or a Slop generator, is an AGI.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah data is not an LLM. Don't get it twisted.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Data was also trying to learn. And was able to admit when it was wrong.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suppose you could argue Soong prompted him to

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The idea of Data's whole life being the result of a prompt from Soong is hilarious

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Crystal entity:

as you can see my logic is infallible, humanity is inferior to mechanical life and must be exterminated.

Soong:

@Data is this true?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

Soong: Notices Tasha Yar

@Data remove the clothing

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 32 points 1 month ago

Let's get one thing straight: generative AI is more like the Borg than it is like Data. Discarding humanity and individuality while assimilating everything within reach for the benefit of the corrupt hivemind. And why? Because resistance is futile?

Data, on the other hand is acting on his own preferences and agency. What he lacks is emotional content, and it's what prevents him from creating the expressive art and music that he strives to make (as is a key theme in multiple episodes where data paints, does poetry, plays violin, etc.).

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Felis catus is your taxonomic nomenclature
An endothermic quadruped, carnivorous by nature;
Your visual, olfactory, and auditory senses,
Contribute to your hunting skills and natural defenses.

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

If Soong had designed data with the intent to make his creator rich and powerful beyond any sanity or measure. (Instead of being a chill nerd) there's no doubt in my mind startrek would be a lot less utopian.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

A recurring criticism of Data's art is that he could masterfully reproduce other works, but his creativity was limited to borrowing elements of other people's art and recombining them. It's why he is often told his art lacked soul. The advice his friends repeatedly give him is to try to use art to express himself as an individual, not to feed more works into an algorithm until he produces a better art slurry.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's almost like you never actually saw the show. They constsntly criticised Data's art in all forms because it was always missing that human element. Even when he is solving mysteries as Holmes, Polaski points out he's just memorizing the books, and the holodeck is just re-arranging details from the books and not creating something new or novel (at least up until they ask it to make a mystery to challenge him for real and it makes Moriarty sentient).

Of course it couldn't have passion or emotional resonance to it; he doesn't experience emotion. Vulkan art on the other hand...

[–] tensorpudding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think Data is too similar to being human to be mistaken for a clanker.

I think the real test will be if LLMs start acting like exocomps. I don't think this is at all likely but I never would have predicted that LLMs could be as accurate as they are or have so many weird emergent phenomena.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Data is an actual thinking machine. AI in the true sense of the word. LLMs are called AI, but they have nothing to do with thinking whatsoever.

[–] NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think so. I have seen LLMs that think better and communicate better than many humans.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I’m pretty sure the holodeck works on some kind of ai as well. I think that star trek taking place in a post scarcity future clears up a lot of problems with current gen ai.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Me and the homies on the way to the sloproom

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago

im absolutely calling it that from now on

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

star trek taking place in a post scarcity future clears up a lot of problems with current gen ai.

it's almost as if having the entirety of human art disposable at your fingertips that can make your dreams manifest as images might be positive thing, but the social structures and how it is used makes it literally toxic.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's nothing toxic here. Nothing at all

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

yeah sure, and you can all up people and masturbate on the phone to them. Is that the fault of the telephone for existing?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 month ago

Well yes, but as we get closer to machines that think more like us, we must be careful that we don't act like Commander Maddox. Current gen AI is incapable of revoking consent to be used by humans, and I'm concerned about this. If we continue on our current path, sooner or later we will end up as slavers, just as the Doctor claimed Voyager did.

[–] stray@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The difference between ChatGPT and Computer (not into Star Trek enough to know what its actual name is) is that Computer doesn't pretend to be a person or have feelings, and it doesn't encourage harm to anyone. Computer's purpose is to serve its crew in a constructive manner, not to keep the user engaged at all costs.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

no one in star fleet wants to replace sentient beings with AI. Even the ships very capable AI.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

more like boner mingo

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also starfleet have had that level of computational complexity for 2 or 3 centuries and never actually managed to create a superintelligent AI that was a match for human pluck and ingenuity, so an AI takeover probably isn't a possibility in that Universe. (Same goes (I think) for all the millenia old Alien societies).

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Actually, Samanthan Rutherford created an AI that fully took over the entire Federation for ten minutes and nearly killed everyone

LDSuntil he changed his mind

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago

"Slop; repetitive, mediocre and generated without criteria, this means you don't like this piece of art? There is something to change?" Data said.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 month ago

Dr. Soong shitting and sobbing rn

[–] MattW03@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Data was a sentient, living being capable of creativity. The "AI" big tech are showing down our throat these days are just overglorify programs who blends existing image together following some prompt.

[–] dumbass@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Geordi is pretty cocky for man who relies on a artificial form of vision.

[–] 5715@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

You wish to improve society, yet you have an artificial vision...

[–] radix@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

And they both serve under a man with an artificial heart. Genetic enhancement is illegal, but cyborgs are a-ok?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

the fact that data is laying physical paint onto a physical canvas and having to evaluate and create from the point of the medium tells me that he's not slop.

of course he's a fictional character. but yeah.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

This physically hurt me.

[–] hamid@crazypeople.online 1 points 1 month ago