Corgana

joined 3 years ago
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I was mod of /r/StarTrek for a decade and I have yet to see a single situation where a vague "bad writing" complaint wasn't serving as cover for a (let's just say) less socially acceptable criticism.

If you're being honest about your feelings then my advice to you is be significantly more concrete with exactly what it is you are criticizing about Kurtzman, or people are going to assume you're obfuscating your true feelings.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Let me get this straight, Paramount was recently purchased by the Ellisons yet you feel the greatest threat to Star Trek is... Alex Kurtzman? Wait wait, let me guess, you don't like how political Star Trek suddenly became this past decade?

 

Not much to chew on here but the fact that he is optimistic is a good sign for me (I will take any hope I can get).

I will say that everyone I’ve interacted with in the — I’ll call it the new Paramount — understands what Star Trek is in the sense that they don’t want to mess it up. They understand how important it is. This isn’t just a cash cow to them. This isn’t something where they just need to put laser guns and a spaceship together and get it out there. They understand that this is something special, and so they’re working very hard to make sure that what they do next lives up to that.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I agree completely, and I think too many online spaces make room for cynicism not realizing that it contributes nothing, and ruins the experience/eventually pushes out of anyone who isn't cynical.

When I was a mod on /r/StarTrek we had a rule (it's also thankfully a rule here) "be constructive" which was basically "Criticism is OK but cynicism is not. If you want to present 'criticism' you need to behave like a real critic and cite examples, not just rant". And let me tell you that rule really upset a lot of folks who felt that had a right to pee in the communal pool.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I always liked this one. It's probably a top three Chakotay episode for me, not that that's saying a lot. I always love the trope of "not sure if this is the top level of reality" like TNG's Frame of Mind.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

I refuse to believe that the vocal complainers of any fandom are ever anything like a majority (yes they do tend to pee in the pools of any online space they are allowed to pee in making it bad for everyone, but I digress...) However I have a feeling the C-suite folks who only care about money are seeing those complainers on Twitter and Reddit and believing they they represent more of the audience opinion than they do.

This was a sad but honestly refreshing take by RTD, usually folks just say "we love the fans!" and leave it at that.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago

I mean the answer is literally to just ignore online communities and make art.

I'm sure most creators would love to, but you just know the network execs are coming to RTD and saying something like "Twitter is really upset about XYZ, can you tone down the wokeness?" etc.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is this a Piefed.social question, or Piefed (the software) question? If it's the latter, I think any tools that allow administrators to identify bots/bot-like accounts are useful. If it's the former, I say ban 'em all and keep the instance authentic (while acknowledging that my account is from elsewhere).

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's disappointing, the theater I went too was almost too loud at times but the boomings and rumblings of the Genesis Planet tearing itself apart were really crazy.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fake fans, imo. Transporters exist.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago

We survived the dark age from 2005-2017 (not you, Kelvinverse movies) and we'll do it again.

 

I was lucky enough to see The Search for Spock on the last day and the remaster frankly blew me away, the surround sound was fun but what really stood out was the matte painting backgrounds. I'm not sure what magic they did, but every single one was truly breathtaking. It made me sad I didn't get to see all of them in theaters now.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 1 month ago

The events of Star Trek haven't taken place yet, but The Historical Documents aired long before that. Presumably some kind of time vortex brought them to us.

 

I highly recommend it, short and sweet and action packed. It felt very much like something from the Twilight Zone. I would have never guessed it was the same person who wrote the sensitive teenage Klingon episode (which is also maybe my favorite from Academy).

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 1 month ago

I tried out Bazzite with an Nvidia 40-series card last year and performance was the same as Windows for everything I tested

All things being equal I would go with AMD too, but if I was OP I certainly wouldn't turn down a good deal on an Nvidia card if one presented itself.

 

I was reading this list and after I calmed my rage (Because real fans would have a top 47...) I became curious to hear what other episodes might make a personal list.

You don't need to give a detailed rationale, I'm curious to know what episodes NOT on the linked list do you just kinda... Think Are Neat 🫴🥔?

I'll start with some of mine:

  • TOS - The Cloud Minders
  • TNG - Timescape
  • DS9 - The Magnificent Ferengi (how this one is not on the list I have no idea)

They're just neat!

 
 

Source (Warning: Facebook)

 
195
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Corgana@startrek.website to c/risa@startrek.website
 
 
140
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Corgana@startrek.website to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk
 

Looking forward to the comments saying this true but good, actually.

view more: next ›