this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
998 points (98.5% liked)

memes

18853 readers
2711 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Pretty sure it is cannon that Edward is stuck at the mental and emotional age of 17. He's also not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Bit unfair to expect this guy to cure cancer just because Carlisle snacked on his neck during the Spanish flu.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Say you become immortal at 20, will your frontal lobe develop?

[–] volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't Interview With The Vampire answer this question? I mean if we take it as part of the vampire canon then the brain does develop further as that little girl was mentally a full ass grown woman trapped in a child's body

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So, New neural connections.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Anne Rice's vampires were different from others. Their skin and hair would become magically perfect, I don't even think Claudia had curly hair as a mortal, the "spirit" that inhabited all vampires wanted them to be goddamn beautiful. Also the male vampires had perpetual erections, but their rapturous pleasure of all the other senses made sex impossible to feel, no desire beyond also wanting beautiful things. Anne Rice was a bit weird. And I'm not even getting into the Sleeping Beauty series, I can't really describe that without getting into CSAM.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Why would an immortal care about curing cancer?

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because being immortal doesn't need to equate to being a narcissistic asshole?

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If we think about it, I'd bet there would be a correlation though... Being immortal has to disconnect you from the rest of society.

Dark triad traits have got to be off the charts on Immortal beings.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could work the opposite way where an immortal would be extremely motivated not to keep having their loved ones die on them.

Or alternatively you get a World of Darkness situation with the mummys wherein they basically go mildly batshit due to being high on life itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Because an immortal is likely to have formed connections with mortals that died of cancer. Als, if their friends live longer, they need to start from scratch less often. Another way to archive that is to befriend a family for generations.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

To an immortal, it probably wouldn't make much of a difference. Either they die from cancer or they survive but then die anyways a few decades later. Plus, vampires have ways of extending someone's life without any medical science anyways.

Though some lores for Dracula had him very deep and advanced in science as well as magic, so it's possible he did have a cure for cancer but just didn't care to share it because humans are just livestock to him.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Well cancer isn't really a disease in the sense that other illnesses are so it might be worth figuring out incase there's a chance you could end up as a giant suffering blob of immortal tumour.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Be a good way to secure enough money to never have people questioning why you're never seen in daylight and have been around for so long without looking like you've aged.

Except... Aren't the vampires in those books/movies able to be in the sun? That's when you see them sparkle, isn't it?

[–] Haaveilija@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I mean immortal and immoral are close but not exactly identical

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

would an immortal be exempt from having cancer?

biologically speaking cancer itself is immortal. I suppose that would mean if an immortal person had cancer, their tumors would be numerous and grotesque.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But treating cancer might be more straightforward, taking out more than you need to and just let the healing take care of putting correct tissue back.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

but maybe the trauma of removing it causes more cancer to manifest? it's not unusual for traumatic injuries to cause cancer to start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

maybe he tried and gave up and moved on to... um... other things.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cannot imagine wanting to spend time with children after being around for hundreds of years!

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

People adults aren't anymore mature, they just have more money

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Maturity comes from life experience and plenty of people mature very quickly in periods of adversity, while their peers linger in childhood or adolescence because there's no stressors propelling them onward.

I should note that "maturity" isn't some kind of universal good, either. A person regularly subjected to physical violence will learn coping mechanisms to avoid or endure that abuse. They'll come out with these reflexes and responses that other adults can read as "mature". But I wouldn't say they're better for it.

Similarly, people who endure poverty have to learn mature habits as a method of survival far sooner than their wealthier peers - how to provide food and shelter for yourself, how to navigate social bureaucracies, how to operate motor vehicles safely. But the techniques they adopt - lying, stealing, driving without any formal training - aren't condusive to a safe neighborhood or a functional social network.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Ya, but your life experiences change you and the way you think. If you're software developer it becomes really difficult to watch any show with "hacking" in it. Firefighters and other first responders find it really difficult to watch anything that involves "rescue". There's a YouTuber with over 5 million subs who got his start on YouTube by being a firefighter who made fun of firefighting shows.
Now magnify that be a couple hundred years. Your experiences, the things you would have lived through, the basic changes in technology, the world and just the way people live... Your way of thinking would be so radically different from someone who's only experiences have been in school, parents, and modern life that it would be insanity try to pretend to be one.
I have enough trouble finding common ground and stuff to talk about with those old friends of mine that decided to never have kids or buy a house. I can't even conceive of how I would go about "blending" in with high schoolers for the rest of eternity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 140 points 1 day ago

But he doesn't want to cure cancer, he wants to hit on underage girls.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

And smell them

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 65 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Not just a minor but person who might have a mental disorder/illness. In case you never read Twilight, the vampires have unique abilities, Edward’s being telepathy. When he meets Bella, he is unable to detect any thoughts from her. The entire book Bella is literally described as having no subconscious thoughts.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Really? She has such an intellectual-seeming blank slackjaw in the movies

[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The books/movies make quite clear that Bella has a special power which makes her immune to Edward’s telepathy. It was a huge plot point of the second book.

To imply that she was like somehow cognitively disabled is both wrong and really weird…

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 1 points 18 hours ago

But it is very funny.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

The movies make her out to be a total dumbass vs the books. I mean imo its mostly dumb overall but just saying the movies made her seem worse.

Also the actress literally only has 1 expression. 😐

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But Edward wouldn't have known that when they first interacted.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He did think she smelled bad. That was hilarious

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

"She's dumb as shit and she stinks to high heaven... I'm in love."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 17 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I remember I did actually talk to a teenage girl about that (it was many, many years ago) and she still insisted 'but it's hot though'.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

It depends... If the age difference is hundreds of years, then it's magical. If it's 30 years, then it's just weird.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mONdshkDTTE

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›