oh, would you look at that, banning something only made it unregulatable. I'm sure this has never happened before.
Europe
News and information from Europe πͺπΊ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
Wait... criminalisation doesn't work and just makes unregulated and black markets grow?
Who would have thought?
Yes but we were righteous about it this time, it should have worked!?
Wait... You mean the experts warning that this exact thing would happen were right?
Who would have thought? Surely not the experts!
Username checks out

The UK now that all the children are safe from watching porn

Only half?
The other half lied.
I assume that, given the focus of the article
whether or not Britons are going to sketchier sites or not than they had been prior to the legislation coming into force
that this number doesn't include users who are simply using a VPN or Tor or similar to ignore restrictions on regulated sites doing IP-based geoblocking.
Whatβs βfunnyβ is that this law will push users to sites that are exposing them to viruses and scams which directly parallels real for-pay sex when prostitution is illegal and pushing people to unregulated sources that expose them to viruses and scams.
Iβm concerned that the sites people are flocking to will not only have less protection for the consumers, but also less protection for the performers. Sites that break the law in one way may be breaking the law in others, such as in regard to whether the actors are being coerced to perform, or are underage.
I know nobody wants to think about the ethics, but those are real concerns that all these laws conveniently forget about. Pushing people to the dark web means theyβll be exposed to some very concerning content.
Yup. I know someone who has revenge porn released of her. When she found it on legit sites, she was able to get it taken down. When she found it on dodgy sites, if she was even able to contact someone from the site, they rarely took it down. One site even had it on their featured videos on the homepage a few days after she emailed, which surely must be a deliberate act of spite
Stupid fucking backwards law. I was watching cheeks get clapped on the internet from the moment I knew what sex was. It didn't do me any harm.
As it has been said many times before, it's totally about control rather than safety.
Who would have thought that it would backfire... /s
These imbecile law makers are now doubling down, because it would be the end of their careers if they admitted what a fucking failure this is.
Now they want to check ages for using VPNs, which is obviously another idiotic thing to do, and would lead to more idiotic laws, until the UK is more restricted than China.
"backfire"? It's working exactly as intended. Does nothing for the children but the nanny/nazi state foundation is getting stronger.
Now they want to check ages for using VPNs, which is obviously another idiotic thing to do, and would lead to more idiotic laws, until the UK is more restricted than China.
Even in a world where one assumes that they do this
which the present British government has stated that they are not
and it is successful and enforce it, then the next problem will be stuff like Tor. No commercial providers involved, so they can't lean on payment processors. Now the British ISPs need to be compelled to try and detect that
and one can make Tor a lot harder to detect than it presently is, where people just don't care that much
and block it. Let's imagine that Parliament successfully gets Britain's telecom infrastructure modified and manages to fix all this and enforce it.
If you've got OpenSSH on your computer, any Linux box out there
which could be a cheap VPS, say
running SSH is pretty easy to turn into an exit node for a SOCKS5 proxy:
$ ssh -D 1080 <remote host>
Now your local host has a SOCKS5 proxy listening on 127.0.0.1. Tell your browser to use localhost as a SOCKS5 proxy, and all your browser traffic is magically coming from Country X. This Firefox plugin allows toggling use of a proxy on and off by clicking a button in the toolbar, so you can bip on and off as desired.
Okay, now maybe they manage to make it illegal for Britons to obtain access to SSH-capable servers elsewhere in the world.
Then people head over to fully-darknet stuff like Hyphanet. So then you're down to trying to tamp down on a darknet system that, unlike Tor, is already structured to be resistant to state-level censorship that might involve detecting and blocking traffic.
I mean, we can play this game forever, but the practical point here is that there are fundamental, really hard enforceability issues, if you want something beyond political theater. Yeah, okay, some of these things are going to take some technical knowledge, but if there's real demand to use them, it's also not hard for someone to slap a pretty front-end on up and make one-click solutions. Do you make all British Internet access systems trusted, closed, and state-controlled? Do you shift over to trying to punish (by definition, local) people who might view pornography rather than go after some source of pornography somewhere on the Internet outside of British legal jurisdiction? Like, you're talking about a very different world.
North Korea has some success in controlling the information environment that its citizens have access to, but that would involve such a transformation of Britain that I think that it's safe to say that few Britons, no matter how opposed they are to pornography, would likely welcome it, and even there, it's limited:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography_in_North_Korea
North Korea forbids the possession, production, distribution and importation of pornography. This is punished harshly by the government. Nevertheless, pornography is widespread in the country because people secretly import it, or locally produce it.
In the past, pornographic videos were also made in North Korea.[1] They began to appear during the leadership of Kim Jong Il,[3] who himself reportedly had a significant collection of pornographic films.[5] Domestic titles were usually immediately seized by the authorities. North Korea has also exported pornography in an effort to gain hard currency. Some of these efforts were through North Korean websites.[6]
Watching pornography became widespread among the country's elites in the late 1990s. Thereafter, the practice has spread to other societal strata as well. Domestic pornographic works usually feature nude or bikini-wearing North Korean women dancing to music. The Literature and Art Publishing Company secretly published a pornographic book, Licentious Stories, for the use of party officials. In 2000, the Korean Central Broadcasting Committee also published a pornographic videotape for officials. Imported pornography has nowadays largely replaced domestic pornography. Political and army elites are the most active consumers of pornography. In 2007 renting a CD for one hour cost 2,000 North Korean won.[7] In 1995, a pornographic film could be sold for as much as 80 dollars. In recent years, prices have fallen dramatically due to increased supply,[8] with one Chinese smuggler stating he regularly hands out porn for free for customers who buy pirated K-dramas.[9]
South Korean pornographic films are smuggled into the country.[10] Propaganda balloons sent from South Korea to the North have featured sexually explicit material to appeal to North Korean soldiers, too.[11] Henry A. Crumpton, a veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Operations, explains that he has "never met a North Korean diplomat who did not want porn, either for personal use or resale."[12]
The State Security Department is tasked with monitoring illegal imports of pornographic materials. Involvement in illegal import results in the culprit being shot or sent to a kyohwaso (re-education camp) for 10 to 15 years.[16] Executions of several persons accused of watching or distributing pornography took place in late 2013.[17] It is illegal for tourists to bring pornography into the country.[citation needed] Access to "sex and adult websites" on the Internet has been blocked from the country,[18] but in the past BitTorrent downloads of pornography have been detected, likely relating to foreigners residing in Pyongyang.[19] Likewise, North Koreans living near the border with China use mobile phones equipped with Chinese SIM cards to access Chinese porn sites.[20]
Not everyone can wank to the power trip of ruining an entire country's wank, like the politicians do.
Wise words though you might be able to live out the fantasy in the Tropico games idk off the top of my head.

Of course, they didn't include the kids they supposedly were protecting in the poll.
I use the same sites as always, but have to Fly To Ireland* first. _ *fire up Mullvad
Oh, good shout. I normally nip across to New York when I'm wanting to prepare Special Interest websites, but the latency sucks. A jaunt over to the Emerald Isle might make a nice change.
I have Mullvad set to fire up automatically when I restart my Mac. Forgot about that when I was having issues with my broadcasting setup a few weeks back, and didn't realise until I was 20 minutes into my 2 hour radio show that I was broadcasting from Croatia.
Turns out Croatia's network is pretty steady.
How to grow a black market, part 1:

Any recommendations π₯²?
Half of Brits or half of Brits who watch porn? Having 50% of the population navigate the internet with competence is laudable, given the age distribution.