Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
view the rest of the comments
Kids are going to get exposed to porn no matter what. I do think it has the potential to have some pretty harmful effects on them, but I don't think the answer to that is the Online Safety Act. I don't think this will actually stop kids from stumbling across porn, and I think that putting our heads in the sand and pretending it will is just dumb.
I don't know what would be the best thing to do about this problem, but I do know that the rhetoric around protecting kids is just going to make it less likely that we actually do things that could be useful for supporting kids to have healthy attitudes towards sex.
For instance, I remember that one of the most impactful sites I ever stumbled across as a teenager was an educational website that had loads of pictures of human genitals. Especially as a girl who had already been exposed to porn, it was super useful to see the wide variety of what vulvas can look like.
A depressing number of my peers expressed insecurity over the appearance of their vulvas, and I remember one girl was convinced that she would need to get a labioplasty as an adult because she had more prominent labia minora than she had seen in porn, and didn't realise that her vulva was well within what is normal.
One of my friends expressed anxiety over having sex, because she had been masturbating using cylindrical objects of various sizes, attempting to work up to what she perceived as the average girth of a penis, based on what she'd seen in porn. She was practicing because she was terrified of the size of penises she had seen in porn, and didn't realise that wasn't representative of the average penis size.
As a young adult, once I started having sex, there were a few times when it was abundantly clear that the young man I was with had been heavily influenced by porn, in terms of how they felt they were expected to act.
So many of my peers had their sexual development affected by seeing porn, and better sex education in school could have potentially mitigated some of these harms. However, we won't get productive change in this area as long as we're operating under the prudish "won't someone think of the children" mentality that led to the Online Safety Act. It would be good if we could shield kids from exposure to this stuff, but I don't think that's viable. We need to be more realistic if we actually want to protect kids from harm
I'm alright with making the doors to the local porn shop stickier (no pun intended), but in addition I agree that we need a better understanding of intimacy and sexuality as a society. For some reason its an incredibly taboo subject in western society, and that leaves the extreme religious folks as the only ones talking about it.
I wish this type of discussion was happening in our local government town halls rather than in a corner of the internet most won't ever see.