CAVOK

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
i2p
 

DETROIT, Jan 17 (Reuters) - U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Saturday it is up to Europe to decide whether it wants to raise new tariff threats from President Donald Trump against some European countries over Greenland.

Paywall? https://archive.is/01M6o

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

It's not the numbers, yet. It's the message it sends.

 

Amid Donald Trump's threats to seize Greenland, Ursula von der Leyen says the EU will continue working with the US to reinforce Arctic security. At the same time, the European Commission has confirmed that Greenland is "in principle" covered by the bloc's mutual assistance clause.

 

Donald Trump’s trade officials have accused Brussels of attempting to secure a “monopoly” for its meats and cheeses in South America as part of its blockbuster trade deal with Mercosur countries.

The EU and four South American countries will on Saturday sign a trade agreement, after negotiating for 25 years, which would cut almost all tariffs across a combined market of 700mn people.

But US officials have hit out at the deal for harming American farmers, barring them from selling produce that is tied to particular places in European countries, such as prosciutto di Parma, feta cheese and champagne.

“This is a blatant attempt to limit competition and export opportunities for non-EU suppliers to fairly trade in this large dairy and processed meat market,” said one US official familiar with the negotiations.

“The deal would basically give EU producers a monopoly for these products and would lock out producers from the US.”

The objections come as transatlantic trade tensions escalate between Washington and Brussels over the bloc’s slow pace in cutting tariffs and regulations following a limited trade deal agreed last year.

The Trump administration’s concern for its agricultural exports follows a $12bn bailout to US farmers last year after the sector was battered by the US president’s trade war.

The official said the US had repeatedly raised its concerns with countries including Brazil and the EU, which would secure protection for more than 340 named foods, as part of trade negotiations.

A trade negotiator for a Mercosur nation said that “geographical indication” for certain products was a long-running gripe for the Americans, but insisted they had not been contacted about the issue recently.

The complaints about the deal between the EU and Mercosur come as Washington makes an aggressive push to secure geopolitical influence across the western hemisphere as part of its so-called Donroe Doctrine.

In recent weeks Trump has launched a military operation to seize Venezuela’s leader Nicolás Maduro, and warned that Cuba, Colombia and Mexico could all be next in America’s crosshairs.

A majority of European member states backed the terms of the deal last week, despite widespread opposition from farmers, who claim that their counterparts in Mercosur operate with lower standards for animal treatment and pesticide use.

The deal represents a new push by the EU to secure lucrative trade agreements aimed at countering Trump’s aggressive protectionism and tariffs.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen made a veiled rebuke to Trump when EU member states approved it last week.

“At a time when trade and dependencies are being weaponised and the dangerous, transactional nature of the reality we live in becomes increasingly stark, this historic trade deal is further proof that Europe charts its own course and stands as a reliable partner,” she said.

She also shrugged off any idea the EU should stay out of the western hemisphere, adding it was “testament to the endurance and strength of our relationship with Latin America, and one that will bring us closer together”.

The Commission declined to comment. The US trade representative’s office declined to comment. Brazil’s trade ministry declined to comment.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I'm all for taxing the ultra-wealthy, but from the calculations I've seen it won't be nearly enough.

If you don't like what I post you can always block me. I post articles I find interesting and relevant to the topic, ie Europe. It's not like Lemmy is flooded with content anyway, and FT is a reputable source. Even if you don't like it, a lot of people will read the article and have opinions; just have a look at the article comments on the site.

 

Rising numbers of older people across the continent are straining budgets and making for some difficult political decisions.

Paywall? https://archive.is/4rP84

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Forgot we switched year. Fixed.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

First time I've heard of it, and to my defense I just copied the text from the website.

5
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/i2p@lemmy.world
 

As of 2025 the P2P System Tixati has full I2P support.

How to configure it for use with I2P: https://support.tixati.com/i2p

Full changelog here: https://tixati.com/news

Sadly not OSS, so "Caveat Emptor".

Edit: Forgot that it's 2026 now.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I love this.

I also think that the EU should prohibit PII from being stored in the cloud where there isn't a 100% guarantee that this data won't leave Europe without the explicit consent of the organisation storing it. Starting with governments in 2030 (or something) and then expanding this to private companies.

Need to store PII? Then it's on prem or an EU cloud provider. Nothing else.

I'm willing to accept exceptions as long as they are periodically reviewed and a plan exists exit the situation.

 

Migration to Denmark and Sweden has fallen to historic lows as both Scandinavian countries implement tougher immigration measures, reflecting a broader European trend toward tighter asylum rules.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

True at the time and will remain true until the EU federalise. We really need to start seeing ourselves as Europeans first and country second.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From the article:

Unfortunately, the outcome in this negotiation is that although the EU has agreed to a number of additional measures, they are not sufficient to satisfy our citizens. “So our position stands. We will vote against the agreement.”

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

BReapply. It's not as simple as just reenter or rejoin.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If you want every country to get nukes, this is how you do it. Countries with nukes don't get invaded.

I miss the old world.

view more: next ›