CAVOK

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
i2p
 

Edit: Removed the un-linked archive reference.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But then they would have risen even without the introduction of the euro, no? This wasn't raising the prices by stealth because people couldn't convert between the currencies, it was just normal price hikes. Prices go up all the time.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I think the UI has improved with the latest release, but then you need to pay to use it on your car screen.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That's not really a criticism of the euro is it? I assume they could just legislate to keep both prices for a year or two just to keep the shopkeepers honest.

 

Swedish Finance Minister Elisabeth Svantesson said she would launch an inquiry into the pros and cons of euro adoption if the current center-right government she represents remains in power after an election in September. “A thorough analysis is needed of the advantages and disadvantages, not least in light of the security situation we are currently in,” Svantesson said during a parliamentary debate on Tuesday. The finance minister’s comments suggest the question of ditching the krona is edging back onto the political agenda after more than two decades out of the limelight. Swedes voted against introducing the European common currency at a referendum in 2003, and discussions around adoption have been muted since then. About 32% of Swedes are in favor of switching to the euro while 49.5% are against, according to last year’s survey by Statistics Sweden. In addition to winning over public opinion, a change of currency in Sweden would face other serious obstacles. Only lawmakers from the smaller Liberal and Center Parties said they were in favor during Tuesday’s debate in parliament. Svantesson said she saw both advantages and disadvantages, while Mikael Damberg of the Social Democrats said his party was “not currently calling” for euro adoption. Representatives of the Green Party, the Left Party and the Sweden Democrats said they were against such a move.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Yeah, apparently using it means you're participating in a ddos attack on some blog. Not going to be part of that.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It's where the name comes from, yes. Ian and his then girlfriend Deborah.

I knew neither.

 

Not linking to archive(.)is because of malicious code there, but the article is available there if you run into a paywall.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There's magic earth. I used it until they locked Android auto behind a subscription. A shame since it was quite good and I was happy to provide data.

Not open source though.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

No idea. The reason I read so much about migration is that I don't understand why it's such a big issue for many people.

Sure, it can be done better, but that's true for almost everything in politics, so why is this so contentious?

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's bad. Am I correct in assuming that once I close the tab I'm no longer participating, or do I have to do more to avoid being complicit?

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So by using archive.is I'm part of the ddos against this blog?

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Financial Times. Large sites should be able to handle the extra traffic.

Maybe not okay to use, but at least not risky from a personal perspective.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Good info. So it's still alright to use for sites like FT and the likes then. ;-)

view more: next ›