this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
423 points (98.4% liked)

Europe

8399 readers
1382 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 114 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Also: British voters are on track to elect Nigel Farage as PM of a fascist government. It makes no sense.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Goomba fallacy: The article states that 50% of the polled people want to be part of tne EU, and the latest opinion polls show Reform UK (Farage's party) winning 33% of the votes.

I can assume there's next to no overlap in those.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 11 points 6 days ago

Oh awesome, that fallacy is so incredibly common, now I've got a name for it.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I really really hope they don't, but I could certainly imagine it after Labour shit the bed and disenfranchised a lot of it's voter base.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 12 points 6 days ago

I think there's a lot of assumptions going into current polling. Labour is disenfranchising a lot of people, but a large number are becoming true "don't knows" and taking themselves out of polling calculations.

These are the the left of the party who are politically homeless. The greens are mopping up some of them, but Polanski is a divisive character. Some love him, and some find him superficial. Some might land in the Lib Dems as their social policies are left of labour, but there's a lot that would never even consider that. Corbyn was trying to set up a party for them, but that's never going anywhere.

One thing is for sure, this block is not voting for Farage. He's diametrically opposite to what these people believe in.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Got a few years to right that ship. I’m hoping we figure with out, hell I’m hoping Labour manage to figure out social media exists and use it to fight some fire with fire

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Labour needs to go hard Return and hold Russian-influenced Brexit traitors accountable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They need to stop being an authoritarian and economically right party. People voted for change, and have not gotten what they voted for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

10yrs from now when the UK is back in the EU: "this isnt working out we should leave"

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

πŸˆβ€β¬›

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yes please. Even though none of my family voted for Brexit, barely sufficiently enough people in the UK did to tip a majority. I call those people arseholes. Many arseholes know that they dropped a bollock. Some however still think Brexit worked, but that some tiny boats with migrants landing on UK shores are sufficient to offset the millions per week that Boris promised the NHS. Little boats also killed the oven ready deals that Brexiteering types had ready and waiting to go. Fair to say, I hate Brexiteers with a passion.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

the thing that gets me with all these anti-immigrant types is...they also refuse to spend the $ to improve/stabilize these peoples countries so less feel the need to immigrate. to the point where they would rather soend even more $ trying to punish/keep em out than it would take to stabilize.

not sure why we call these stupid fucks "conservatives"...they're not conserving anything, it's just regression and self-punishment

They are successfully conserving their very special worldview whenever it is threatened by reasonable arguments or common sense.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

It's just racism, nothing more.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It should be allowed. Of course, without the special privileges Britain got the first time around.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They should be forced to switch to the Euro like everyone else. That will prove they really mean it.

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A shared currency and central bank for diverse economic systems is a pretty bad idea actually.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

It really depends on which trade-offs you consider worth it. Reducing economic friction has huge benefits, even if you have to give up some national financial tools to get it.

Since the UK joined, a lot that didn't even exist back then, or was optional, has become a mandatory requirement for EU membership.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 50 points 6 days ago (1 children)

spoiler: it's still at 50%

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 27 points 6 days ago (2 children)

In Britain alone it's 69%, though.

The YouGov survey, carried out in six European countries, shows 50 per cent of voters in the UK would vote to be an EU member if there was a referendum now, compared to 45 per cent and 46 per cent in France and Italy. The numbers were higher in Germany (62 per cent) Denmark (75 per cent) and Spain (66 per cent).

It also found that in Britain, just 31 per cent of people said they would vote to be outside the EU – far fewer than the 52 per cent who backed Brexit nearly a decade ago. In France, that figure was 30 per cent, Italy 28 per cent, Germany 20 per cent, Denmark 14 per cent and Spain 13 per cent.

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

It says 50% for, 31% against, and the remaining 19% is presumably β€œundecided” or the equivalent. In the context of this article, they’re interchanging UK/Britain.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These are different questions, right?

"Should we join?" vs. "Should we leave?"

The first question is nonsensical for current EU members, and the second is nonsensical for non-members of the EU.

But I guess they include them to make a better comparison between these types of questions?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 5 points 6 days ago

I'm not sure, but maybe it could be formatted like "Country should be part of EU? 1 = Strongly Agree, 5 = Strongly Disagree"

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Every single time I read something like this, I'm so glad to be out of this shithole. When Brexit happened, I moved to the EU and never looked back. Glad to have done it.

Edit: typo.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So you were British Citizen?

Do British Citizens even get to keep EU Citizenship after Brexit?

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nope, needed to become a citizen of the country I reside in.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How much time did you have to do that?

Like do they kick you out immediately after UK leaves, or do you get a grace period?

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

When the geriatric cunts voted "leave" I made my preparations, because it's clear the country would go downhill as soon as they withdrew from the EU. I buggered off long before that happened and it happened just like everyone anticipated.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 27 points 6 days ago

listening to russian propaganda, and brexit destroyed thier economy

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Some people don't appreciate what they had until it's gone. I hope people can learn to appreciate and understand what they have while of course working towards making things better too.

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Lol.... You lot voted to leave the EU.

[–] chramies@europe.pub 1 points 3 days ago

Is there a shorthand for 'I didn't.' Because I didn't. Always been pro-Europe and voted Remain. Please don't assume everyone is the same.

[–] Flisty@mstdn.social 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

@guyoverthere123 @CAVOK only by a 4% majority, heavily skewed to the older population. Ten years later, even natural demographic change would mean we'd vote to stay in with the same referendum now - but also we've had a pandemic that largely affected the elderly.

So when you say that you're talking to dead people.

load more comments (1 replies)

I voted to stay

[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

They found out the hard way, I guess

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Idiots always want what they don’t have.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 days ago
[–] sp3ctre@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's just like if you open a door for your cat and it sits down in the sweet spot between "in" and "out".

Would like to see UK in Schengen though...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 6 days ago

Polls also showed we were going to vote remain. I wouldn't believe what any polls say now.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί