Vincent

Wat Odido niet goed heeft gedaan, is data langer bewaren dan nodig. (En ook langer dan ze in de voorwaarden aangeven.)

Tegelijkertijd: je ziet wel dat dit soort gebeurtenissen soms leidt tot een soort institutioneel trauma, waardoor ze in de toekomst misschien juist voorzichtiger met je data omgaan. Zie ook: de medewerker die bang is ontslagen te worden nadat ie net per ongeluk z'n baas €1 miljoen heeft gekost door een foutje te maken. Zijn baas: "Je ontslaan? Nadat ik net €1 miljoen heb geïnvesteerd in je ontwikkeling?"

Ik ben helaas sceptisch dat de concurrenten van Odido het op dit vlak beter doen.

(Of nou ja, freedom.nl, van voormalige XS4All-mensen, vertrouw ik wel.)

They have some functionality for which you can login, and only at login are you asked to agree to the terms. Presumably you can just use the offline functionality of the editor just fine without agreeing to anything other than the AGPL.

That's all true except for that last paragraph - the rights and conditions they gave you to existing code are irrevocable, so you'll continue to be able to use the last open source version indefinitely, including the feature you made yourself. It's just that they can release new versions and not publish the source code of their additions, even if that new release also includes a feature you made yourself.

(I'm not a lawyer, but still.)

De zoutstrooiers! Niet heel vaak dat ze wat te streamen hebben, maar als wel is het wel cool, en dan zit je toch binnen.

People said (and say) the same thing about tabs.

Who knows, maybe one day window managers will actually solve this.

If only an AI had come up with this.

The violence of the German language goes well with a violent sneeze.

Really makes you think.

I'm sorry that there are jerks on the internet - thanks for making the rest of us laugh anyway :)

I imagine that UI was kind of hard to put together though, since it's going to be confusing anyway. The UI is meant to allow people to toggle everything off, and add exceptions that they want to leave on. The reverse, however, is not needed: people don't really want to toggle everything "on", and then selectively disable things. To top that off, you also want to clarify that, after you toggle things off, new AI features that get added later will also be off automatically.

I imagine especially that latter part influence the "toggle on to block" design - that makes it an "active" setting to proactively disable things in the future.

IDK, I'm not a UI designer, but I see how it's hard.

Sorry I actually deleted my comment almost straight away after posting it because ironically, I found that actually, I had misread your comment, but apparently it still made its way to you.

If I'm reading their comment correctly (I haven't actually read the article yet), they're saying it's not rolling back the ruling; they're rolling back the weakening of GDPR that was done in response to the ruling.