Never.
(Figured I'd answer since I'd usually only be compelled to answer if I was a yes.)
Never.
(Figured I'd answer since I'd usually only be compelled to answer if I was a yes.)
Otherwise we would have noticed adverse effects sooner. If you have to go looking it’s probably not that bad
I'm not sure if asbestos would agree...
Ah I stand corrected!
I don't think you're automatically opted out of remote improvements if you had turned off extra data collection though.
In the Support Article it says:
This feature is experimental and is being introduced to the Firefox user base through a progressive rollout. It may not yet be available to all users. Additionally, remote improvements must be enabled.
Would've been nice if that had been in the article.
In my defence though, I am the most important person in the room.
I read that comment before I read the article, and it reads quite differently seeing that that excludes this start of the sentence:
I also know when
i.e. I take that as the literal opposite: they can predict and avoid that situation.
And I think StreetComplete also asks you to verify that old info is still correct, and to correct it if not.
Temporary Containers is a bit clunky, but it achieves the same goal using native Firefox mechanisms, so I assume that it works for ETP Strict too.
Ah crap you got me, I don't even remember the British term anymore.
Possibly that's related to me not knowing the term in the first place, because we don't use British English here either. Or any English, for that matter.
Volgens mij pleit ze er dus precies wel voor om minder sterke en arme mensen te helpen - omdat dat de leefbaarheid verbetert.