this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
334 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

19898 readers
1823 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 133 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What about, y'know, doing the actual research you're supposed to be writing about?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 68 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just ask chatgpt to do that.

[–] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 3 months ago

And why write 4000 words that makes sense every day when the LLM can hallucinate 120 papers every day.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Could be a mathmatician writing about numbers and such.

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We still do research and have lots of work to do before a paper even begins lol

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Like, on your favorite number?

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lmaoo, I see your name now you’re funny

[–] socsa@piefed.social 69 points 3 months ago (2 children)

At my peak, I easily posted a million words a year to Reddit. The idea that I wasn't putting that effort into actual productive writing is definitely an idea I've had many, many times.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

It was productive, just not for you. The LLM trainers are happy for all that VC money you helped them get.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 44 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, dialogue is important practice. We once wrote letters to each other.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, what ever happened between you two, anyway? You guys used to be so lovey dovey!

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 69 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wish I knew this when I was starting out:

  • write grant proposals instead of articles
  • use the winning grants to support grad students
  • get the grad students to do the research and writing which motivate new grant proposals
  • keep writing grant proposals until the entire world is either your grad students, or people funding your research
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 16 points 3 months ago

Ego the Living Planet, but it's just academia

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 45 points 3 months ago

Love it when people publish just to publish, really improves the whole academic enterprise!

[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 3 months ago

This seems like it should be in the LinkedInLunatics community.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bonus points if you take all those words you wrote, sort them alphabetically, and publish them as ~3k word works. Challenge the STEM community to reconstruct your original papers.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Fun fact: Hooke's law (f= kx for springs) was originally published as an anagram - all the letters in alphabetical order. Latin, of course.

https://spark.iop.org/puzzle-hookes-law

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

4000 words? That's only like 40 minutes a day at 100 wpm, a speed anyone writing professionally should easily be able to maintain. Spend half the workday writing. 24000 words a day. 6 times the articles. Thank me later.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago

Ah, a man of ~~culture~~ management, I see

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 months ago

This is like the myth of the 10x AI developer. Even if I could code 10x faster, coding is only maybe 25% of what I do at best.

[–] dugmeup@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 3 months ago

Lol someone is equating writing the next twilight saga to research, which requires (checks notes) ... research

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago

That’s exactly what I thought this was at first. Reminds me of an old video, maybe TikTok, where some guy is like “ok get two fast food jobs and live in your car. Work 80 hours a week. Buy a duplex and then rent it out.”

[–] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I know of a manager who unironically believes this for internal corporate technical reports (ours are academic style and more rigorous and formal than they need be...). It's not quite to this extent, but I've overheard conversations where the manager apparently can't fathom why their subordinates are incapable of double digits over a year.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Liberal mem- bers of the credentialed classes love to use the word empower when they talk about “people,” but the use of that verb objecti- fies the recipients of their help while implying that the people have no access to power without them.

I'm loving just the introduction.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, this is what I meant.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I remeber something about monkeys and typewriters 🤔

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Was even Paul Erdös that productive?

[–] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Easy there Mr. Hubbard!

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago

That's a bit right?