this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

News

33851 readers
2452 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chief Justice John Roberts touted the independence of the federal judiciary as a “counter-majoritarian check” and urged Americans rattled by partisan politics to keep faith with the Constitution in an annual report Wednesday that steered clear of direct discussion of modern controversies.

Roberts’ history-heavy statement made no mention of Donald Trump, nor the intense conflict that has cropped up between federal courts and the White House since his second inauguration nearly a year ago.

Trump has questioned the legitimacy of courts that paused his policies and called for the impeachment of judges who ruled against him.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Had to double check the source, to make sure this wasn't The Onion.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Came here to confirm my exact sentiment.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 2 points 49 minutes ago

We are circling the drain. Any day now.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 64 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Well maybe he should uphold the Constitution instead of wipe his ass with it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That dude is going down in history as a giant asshole that was bribed heavily.

Justice Taney would like a word.

No no you see, when he talks about "judicial independence" he means "judicial independence from the Constitution"

[–] blackbearjesus27@lemmy.world 36 points 1 hour ago

Probably should have thought about that before you made the president a king

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

“This arrangement, now in place for 236 years, has served the country well,” Roberts wrote in the report, which was released by the Supreme Court hours before the start of the new year.

"It was only when I started giving Trump all of the power that is supposed to lie in the Supreme Court that the arrangement started to fail," Roberts continued. "I thought I could get an even greater position of power by kowtowing to the demands of Trump, but now he says that my ass isn't as supple as it used to be, and that I keep losing concentration when I'm servicing him. But what can I do? He keeps falling asleep in the middle. Justice Thomas said the same thing. I knew people had said that with Trump, loyalty is a one-way street, but it's shocking to experience it myself. I used to have all the power in the world, but now I just really feel used by this whole ordeal."

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 57 minutes ago

John if you get on your knees right now and pray for mercy and beg forgiveness. The American people will be swift with their justice and grant you an early end of your life long term.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 7 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Ya know it's kinda funny that I'm finding I agree with Justice Roberts, I think it would be great for the Judiciary to be a 'separate but equal' "branch" of our government. No, really, this is a great idea. Like we could have like maybe three, separate but equal branches, maybe this is a stretch, but we could call them, umm, The Judiciary, The Legislative, and the Executive Branches.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 25 minutes ago

What if each of them actually did their job? And only their job? Or am I being too fantastical?

[–] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 0 points 25 minutes ago

lol that’s great

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 55 minutes ago

On the other hand the only reason I don't want Roberts to drop dead right this second is because I'm afraid of who would replace him.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

I absolutely agree in principle. This court however is corrupt as all fucking hell. I want a court that tells me no when I want to infringe on the freedom of others, not one that says anything is ok when the president does it. Also I want one that actually believes in precedent like Roe.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 32 minutes ago

Great idea. How about we require that any partisan judge or lawyer has to retire and is ineligible for the bench and the bar?

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

It will go a long way of making sure that happens as soon as he dies in 3 years.