this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
483 points (98.4% liked)

Not The Onion

19211 readers
1103 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://news.abolish.capital/post/16341

Matthew Yglesias is a centrist political operator with a history of having the worst opinion on every topic. He may have outdone himself this time, comparing criticism of billionaires to the suffering of Holocaust victims.

First, they came for the billionaires…

It's time to take a bold stand in defense of America's oft-maligned billionaire class.https://t.co/QhStxRtf1y pic.twitter.com/bxYzVYVSnX

— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) December 29, 2025

Oh dear

Yglesias is referencing First They Came, which is a poem by the German Lutheran pastor Martin Niemöller:

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

While it’s common for people to reference this poem, it’s rare that someone does so as clumsily as Yglesias.

The problem is that billionaires aren’t a minority group which is being targeted by the state. They’re an ultra-minority group which is literally working hand in glove with the state as it targets others:

US President Donald Trump invited the world's richest billionaire oligarchs to sit at the center of his inauguration.

Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, & Google CEO Sundar Pichai symbolically sat with Trump's cabinet picks.

A dozen billionaires will be in the Trump admin. pic.twitter.com/9CHzpmFAEU

— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) January 20, 2025

The Trump administration has been using the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as a Gestapo-like force. This has seen them pulling people off the street much like the Nazis targeted the Jews and the Communists.

“ICE pepper sprayed a disabled woman using a cane, after an abduction raid in her neighborhood. A St. Paul, MN PD Officer then shoves her down hard to the ground after she was already incapacitated and stumbling backwards. (11/25/25)” pic.twitter.com/JgkJg5tb0P

— Ted Cruz Called The FBI on me (@weareronin47) November 26, 2025

Are ICE agents black bagging billionaires?

They are not.

But billionaires like Peter Thiel are profiting from ICE’s activities by providing the tech infrastructure they need to oppress the non-rich population:

Palantir sells AI tools that help law enforcement agencies like ICE analyze massive amounts of personal data.

It's a big reason why it is quickly becoming the most dangerous corporation in America. pic.twitter.com/NC4jgDpx8Y

— Robert Reich (@RBReich) December 7, 2025

People had other criticisms of the Yglesias post too:

My dude, they literally never came for the billionaires.

Elon Musk Wealth
2012: $2 billion
2025: $737 billion

Jeff Bezos Wealth
2012: $18 billion
2025: $255 billion

Mark Zuckerberg Wealth
2012: $18 billion
2025: $234 billion

Federal Tipped Minimum Wage
1991: $2.13
2025: $2.13 https://t.co/v3nidp4CdX

— Warren Gunnels (@GunnelsWarren) December 29, 2025

Come on man, this one is easy.

The Koch brothers have been cramming money into the Cato Institute for decades to make it shit out anti-train propaganda to keep everyone commuting by car whether they like it or not.

And that’s not the only connection! Just the most obvious one. https://t.co/sbmdYv43iD pic.twitter.com/dk78x6lJtj

— Kyle 🚄 (@KyleTrainEmoji) December 29, 2025

People additionally pointed out that billionaires tend to gum up the system like hair in a plug hole:

The correct Marxist line on billionaires is not that they are too powerful but that they are impotent. They represent the waste and hoarding of society's productive powers. The growth of billionaires coincides with stagnation and a decline in economic dynamism. https://t.co/QQjWdBAKvJ

— John Ganz (@lionel_trolling) December 29, 2025

This certainly makes sense, right?

It’s not for nothing that things are getting harder for most people while they’re getting so much easier for billionaires.

Loser mentality

Trump has performed so poorly in office that it should be easy for the Democrats to return to power. As people have highlighted, however, Democrat politicians and advisors have a knack for identifying the worst possible policy platforms:

The seeds are being planted for the Democratic Party to lose against all odds in 2028. Healthcare costs are out of control. Running on Medicare for All or even a public option would crush. Instead they will run on AI development, billionaire appreciation and permit reform in CA. https://t.co/jp3jakNUiT

— Kate Willett (@katewillett) December 29, 2025

It’s pretty obvious why they’re drawn to billionaires, anyway, as Mrs Merton said to Debbie McGee:

"So, what first attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels?" pic.twitter.com/gZ1fFWKuq8

🇬🇧📺 Classic British TV 📺🇬🇧 (@Classicbritcom) March 9, 2025

Featured image via Institute of National Remembrance

By Willem Moore


From Canary via This RSS Feed.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 115 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

First they came for the billionaires
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a psychopathic money hoarder

Then they came for the fascists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a face to be punched

Then they came for the government
And I did not speak out
Because I was not an instrument of oppression

Then they came for capitalism
And I did not speak out
Because I was not part of the system

Then they came for me
No, wait, nobody came for me
I was finally free.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Then they came for me, to offer me a shorter work week, free medical care and decent housing.

[–] msage@programming.dev 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Alright, it's a nice idea, but let us not act like after the current tools of oppression are gone, there won't be new ones.

Anarchy is not going to be all sunshines and rainbows, either.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's just that "I was finally free from the current wave of oppression, and ready for the next one" would be a shitty closing verse.

But yes, you're right. I think oppression is like weeds in a garden: if you're diligent, the fight against it becomes easier over time, as you're preventing the oppression/weeds from creating more of itself. But once you stop fighting, it sprouts out of nowhere, ready to reproduce and take your society/garden over again.

[–] msage@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago

It needs a closing verse like 'Now I am free to build my neighbourhood with my friends to stop any further attempts'

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Obligatory note: Anarchy ≠ Anarchism

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yeah, the system of coming has stopped itself. Ask Ezhov and Yagoda how realistic it is

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know the last two lines are naïve; and yes, the fate of the two former heads of the NKVD is a good example. Or even the whole USSR after Lenin. (If not for an ice pick, that would be known as "Bonapartism with Russian characteristics".)

Still trying to find a good replacement. The original poem conveys "fight for groups you don't belong to, because their enemies will also go after you"; I want the subversion to be something like "don't fight for your enemies", or perhaps "don't fight against people fighting for you".

I'm considering

Then they came for me
No, wait, they didn't — they went after my oppressors
Now I can speak out for myself

Pinging @msage@programming.dev for ideas.

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 74 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The guy has to be given credit for consistently having bad takes on things.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

So enlightened!

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

IDK, a person could stop being a billionaire, continuing their miserable existence as a millionaire, while a jew could not stop being a jew.

Redemption is a main and a key difference here.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to mention that being Jewish is not inherently bad, and doesn't require you to do anything bad to be that way, while choosing to extract surplus value from workers to hoard it for yourself absolutely is.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Tightwad capitalist overlords come in every cultural and religious flavor!

[–] dudleyflippendoodle@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This guy went full Gavin Belson. Never go full Gavin Belson.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago

It's a sin I had to scroll this far down to find the Silicon Valley reference.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

i wish the american Left was as coordinated and dangerous as these assholes pretend it is

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 32 points 1 week ago

As a possible future trillionaire myself, I can only agree. I need to feel protected once I am One of Them!!

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Iglesias's whole thing is writing whatever flatters the wealthy. He sucks. I'd love to never hear from or about him again.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Was Iglasias the guy who proposed paving the NYC subway so cars can drive instead of trains?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Sounds like one of Elon’s ketamine dreams.

[–] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

" Matthew Yglesias is a centrist political operator " We aren't in fucking Kansas anymore if this is centrist.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

No one that claims to be centrist is Centrist.

Centrist is just like Libertarian.

Its a label that right wingers wear to try to camouflage their true purpose and intentions from the uninformed.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It's centrist in the sense that the mainstream old guard Ds and Rs are both corporate bootlickers - so he's solidly in that venn overlap

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mean, I've kinda made that comparison

In the sense that billionaires are actually doing a lot of the things Nazis wrongly attributed to Jews (e.g. causing economic problems, dominating business and culture, degrading morality)

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

And plenty of neonazis are doing the same now. They correctly identify some problems caused by late stage capitalism to rile up people who are suffering because of those, but then the blame is directed at easier targets. It's much easier to point at some ethnic or religious minority, than it is to tackle systemic issues with how society is organized.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 15 points 1 week ago

"These are the three alignment buttons: Extreme Left, Left and Centre."

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

He doesn’t write this stupid shit to be accurate or popular. He writes it for neoliberals in politics who need talking points to justify feigned ineptitude to their constituents.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 19 points 1 week ago

In this case, however, the financial hardship of society as a whole and gross wage theft tearing through us all, for years, actually is the fault of billionaires.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Has no one simply accused him of doing a version of the "all jews are rich" conspiracy and said he's antisemitic?

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Found another one for the guillotine, everybody

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

For some reason people won’t stop lining up for it!

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean.. I'm all for giving them a reason to feel that way.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Round up the billionaires and put them in camps? Don't threaten me with a good time.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

This guy doesn't seem to have quite grasped yet that it's no longer particularly effective to try to cover up the misdeeds of fascist monsters with the misdeeds of historical fascist monsters.

It's ridiculous enough to even try, but now even more so.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Columnist likens billionaires to Jews

Maybe don't do that.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

This is the "toxic empathy" we should be concerned about.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They’re like the oligarchs who enabled the Nazis….but if they want to be victims I think we could dust off the guillotines and make that happen for them

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 1 week ago
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

So, couple things…

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Not even in a fairytale

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 1 week ago

So, an antisemite?

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you look at the polling, right-wingers and most centrists actually think billionaires are good people - good for society too - and that we shouldn't target them.

This asshole is just try to get the left to take more public swings at billionaires as it turns off the rest of the country when we do.

I do not like it, but there it is.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

It's their deeply ingrained affinity towards strict hierarchies. It's drilled into them from youth to obey authority because they're in charge.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh fuck nothing gets voters' blood pumping like permit reform

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well there were a lot of Maga types in Nazi Germany that were against billionaires then.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Horseshoe theory... IS REAL!!!

load more comments
view more: next ›