this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
798 points (99.8% liked)

Science Memes

19910 readers
2002 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 71 points 3 months ago (6 children)

"Intelligent design"

Oh, I don't think so.

Is that phrase even used anymore, or did it run its course of insanity and die off?

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 months ago

A super fun counter argument I heard once is that if it's intelligent design, surely it's not for humans. The universe is BIG with lots of empty space, lots of massive elements to it. Surely it was designed for something much bigger than humans.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I haven’t heard of since there was a clear explanation of how the eye evolved - since that one was a specific example they were referring to

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Considering the human eye is basically backwards, I always found it funny people would try to use it as an example of an intelligent creator

Like we seriously have all the working bits in the path of light, permanently blocking our vision in spots. We just hide it with some post-production brain magic, and I'm supposed to believe that's evidence of an intelligent creator?

[–] Kepion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 3 months ago

'We'll fix it in post' has been plaguing us longer than expected.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

While you're right, it's also funny to say that god was a software developer under deadline pressure

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 9 points 3 months ago

When the bible says "created in god's image" it was originally talking about octopus, it just got mixed up in transcription at some point.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

Dawkins' book "Climbing Mount Improbable" is a great and easy read to introduce the idea of making something complex and seemingly designed for its purpose a much more probable thing to happen if broken into small changes over huge amounts of time. And it's like 30 years old, so probably outdated with more and better evidence now.

There is an old Youtube video by cdk007 (that's still up!) that tackles a related fallacy, where finding a watch on the beach implies a watchmaker because nothing complex can evolve. He created a simulation using watch parts and evolutionary rules to show complexity does arise with the right conditions and enough time.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Graveyard of rhetoric. Happens with all their bad faith bushit.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 8 points 3 months ago

Yep. Buried right next to "family values" and "states rights".

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But we made bananas (and most other fruits) the way they are!

Fucking good for nothing gods, always taking credit for things we humans did all by ourselves...

[–] cravl@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 months ago

Eh, maybe God just has a sense of humor. After all, platypus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Possibly the most complex language in the animal kingdom

That... seems wrong.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be fair I think they meant "most accoustically complex language" which is different from like human languages (which have a degree of nonverbal complexity and ideation clearly beyond whales)

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tonal Languages have entered the chat

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Good luck producing super sonic frequencies. These whales seem to have sonar as factory default equipment.

[–] stray@pawb.social 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

How so? (I'm assuming OOP is using the common definition of "animal" to exclude humans.)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

They didn't use the common definition, they specified the animal kingdom. That definitely includes humans.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

We like to think we aren’t animals. You’re attaching meaning to a combination of words that is far too common to guarantee any kind of single definition.

People don’t like to think they’re animals. Call it whatever you like, in a context like this they almost certainly do not mean to include humans. And heck, do either of us actually know enough about sperm whale communication to say it ain’t? I’m sure Korea’s twelve levels of politeness probably has them beat, but still.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I think they left out a descriptor for the type of complexity which when we're talking about "measures of complexity" is an important detail. I'm guessing they mean accoustic complexity which is used to categorize things like birdsongs.

[–] wideopenarms@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

Humans are the divine chosen beings of true agency plopped onto the earth to bear witness, waiting to return to the source of our divinity, not filthy lowly animals

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

While the bowl of petunias thought "Oh no, not again" and if we understood why that was, we'd know a lot more about the universe than we do now.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago

A random joke that was paid off years and years later

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I will never not upvote Hitchhiker's Guide quotes

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I listen to the radio version of hitchhiker's while I go to sleep often, if I managed to hit play in the middle of the whale's pondering I always back up a bit. It's one of my favourites of the entire series and not as good when played mid pondering.

Also the line about the bowl of petunias having relevance later is quite amusing to be sure. Though I assume not thought of when written.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

IIRC the radio scripts were the very first version. Which means that the joke in the radio show was probably deliberate.

I know for a fact that in the books there's a throwaway gag that the petunias thought, "Oh no, not again," and the narrator mentions something about the fact that if anyone knew what that meant, the universe might make a whole lot more sense.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

That's pretty much the radio version as well the books were pretty close on those lines.

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Literally not a single mention of their testicles. 5/10.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I’m gonna regret this… so tell me about their testicles? Size of basketballs or something?

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

More like the size of a VW Beetle. It's why they're called sperm whales.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They're called sperm whales because of the spermaceti organ, which is probably used to make them loud as fuck, and which contains a liquid which whalers mistook for sperm.

[–] fascicle@leminal.space 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So the testes make sound too? Thats amazing

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Imagine the sound when they have an orgasm. Announcing to the planet that they're getting it on. No kid would be safe from the sound of their parents having sex and vice versa.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Be careful, I've become positively obsessed with them. Well, one in particular...

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

At least you save money on shoes

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 29 points 3 months ago
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's the loudest animal on the planet

Apart from Brian Blessed, of course.

[–] mondomon@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's why I'm always wary to swim in the ocean. I have a strict no schlorp policy.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ohh, so you are afraid to be "schlorped"? By the "sperm" whale?

[–] mondomon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, no big schlorp for me, thanks.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

Big schlorp is probably the words I'll think about from now on whenever I see something about whales.

[–] kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As they are highly flammable it is good that they spend quite a bit of time in water.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Far away from the big ball of fire in the sky

load more comments
view more: next ›