As long as it's individualistic, random acts of violence, it's all chill. Once the violence is collective, oops, nope.
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
132 points (98.5% liked)
memes
23613 readers
317 users here now
dank memes
Rules:
-
All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.
-
No unedited webcomics.
-
Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop
-
Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.
-
Follow the code of conduct.
-
Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.
-
Recent reposts might be removed.
-
No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The solution is clearly for China to train a crack team of ceo killers
meanwhile western countries dole out violence in the developing world on hitlerian levels to maintain capitalism and not a fucking peep
The only moral revolution is one where all involved are mk.ultra-esque sleeper agents spread throughout the world secretly tasked with killing all 4.000 something billionaires all at once.
hell yeah
The average western "leftist" is a just a plain right wing liberal. The graham CIA plantner shit made that clear. It's so clear that the word has zero fucking meaning in western discourse. I mean right wingers that support the pedo Trump think the Dems are left. The Dems that are to the right of Reagan on many things? Like wtf is this shit.
“I’m the farthest left person I know!” Immediately followed by “I miss Obama, when America was progressive and good for the people!”
Okay I'm with you on the western left sucking, but am I the only one who thought the whole Graham Plantner thing was made a bigger deal than it was? Every leftist I know, myself included, had never heard of the guy until AFTER the Nazi tattoo thing came out.
The entire mainstream western left (the Bernie-wing of soc dems) all rallied behind and defended Platner. Hasan and all the breadtubers rallied behind him. Chapo downplayed criticism. Bernie himself stood up for Platner and downplayed nazism on his behalf.
The fact that nobody knew who he was until the Nazi thing came out, but many decided to double-down to protect him anyway really goes to show how much the westoids actually care about "punching a nazi" and "anti-fascism".
There was absolutely shitshows and huge arguments over this, don't try to retro-actively erase history that we just lived through. SO many people were downplaying it, saying that he didn't know what it was, making arguments that being a Blackwater Merc wasn't a dealbreaker, etc.
I'm just saying from where I was sitting it seemed like the guy appeared and disappeared after like a week.
disappeared? He's still running and still has the backing of all the soft-left.
I just think that for western leftists, a candidate that killed brown people for the empire should automatically be excluded from any possible endorsement, no matter how remorseful they may be.
The Nazi tattoo and Zionazi brother were for me just hilarious cases of the American leftist figures being further exposed for their clown like decision to support Platner. Both of these literally don't even matter compared to the fact that he served the genocidal Americans empire.
Tankies! 
I've insulated myself too hard. What's this about? 
and real estate or something?
I made the post on my alt account, it isn't about a current event in particular, I was just thinking about it the other day when someone complained to me about the USSR deporting 30k Estonians to Siberia post-WW2.
I think the logic is if you're just a regular asshole, it's unlikely you're going to get Luigi'd cuz Luigi's only Luigi massively powerful CEOs.
A centralized state can take out CEOs more effectively but those apparatuses can be turned on regular citizens.
Not saying I agree but I think that's the thought process.
regular citizens get killed all the time by random dudes
Yeah but I'm not scared of a Luigi guy doing to me for political reasons.
Since Luigi did his thing there has been like 400 mass shootings
Americans view mass shootings as a force of nature, not political events.
i mean, isn't it a force of nature for US at this point?
Just a chud in a supermarket
It's especially funny because the biggest examples of landlord/capitalist repression in Actually Existing Socialist states (such as the mass Kulak deportations of the USSR) were not dictated by the state but by local soviets, it should be the wet dream of any anarchist (to which so many western "leftist" claim to adhere)
Same with the cultural revolution and the excesses there. those were not done by the state by but para-military small cadres.
A paramilitary is still working on behalf of the government, and local bureaucrats [who are still part of the state] certainly mobilized paramilitaries to defend their position, and then there was a much greater degree of violence when the PLA was deployed to "quell" the violence of the conservative/rebel conflict. I think it's fair to say especially of the earlier "excesses" that while the broad movement was encouraged by Mao, that it was very much up to the rebel faction of Red Guards what exactly they did and the abuse committed by them was thereby pretty "grassroots".
you're right, paramilitary wasn't the right word but I agree, that was my point. That the excesses and violence came from below, not above.
Yeah, the shit was highly decentralized.
A centralized state can take out CEOs more effectively but those apparatuses can be turned on regular citizens.
Not just can but are turned on them regularly, even in AES states, but that's a harsh truth not a lot of MLs are willing to face.
So true, bestie. DAE le People's Stick?
This but unironically
It's a pathetic, intellectually impoverished attempt at a zinger that has nothing to do with what people here or Marxists in general actually believe, which explains why liberals eat it up.
How is it that you've been in the community for as long as you have and still are either unwilling or unable to engage with what the Marxists here believe? Granted, the majority of Marxists here are revisionists, but at least they still support the Marxist conception of communism even if their ideas about socialism are inadequate, but that inadequacy is fundamentally not as you portrayed it. Your portrayal was just empty grandstanding with a declaration that is contrary to what people here have said again and again and would readily tell you if asked. But you have surely seen that, haven't you? So why do you still say it?
oh look the resident squishy lib here to scold the tankies. don't you have some color revolution to defend?
Found the zposter alt
i've been here for a short time and already seen you defend Chomsky's honor, essentially call everyone here tankies without saying it outright & defend multiple color revolutions. That's just in 20 days lol. Call me whatever you want, doesn't change what you are.
I mean, yes, that is true, but I don't think there's an alternative. The state is a means for one class to oppress another, until class society is abolished you can't not have a state apparatus, so even if proletariat states fuck up sometimes and kill people they shouldn't it's the only means to end the dictatorship of the bourgeois.
There is, doing away with the state altogether.
Yeah good luck with the bourgeois counter revolution if you do that.