this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
133 points (98.5% liked)

memes

23614 readers
295 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think the logic is if you're just a regular asshole, it's unlikely you're going to get Luigi'd cuz Luigi's only Luigi massively powerful CEOs.

A centralized state can take out CEOs more effectively but those apparatuses can be turned on regular citizens.

Not saying I agree but I think that's the thought process.

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

regular citizens get killed all the time by random dudes

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah but I'm not scared of a Luigi guy doing to me for political reasons.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Since Luigi did his thing there has been like 400 mass shootings

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Americans view mass shootings as a force of nature, not political events.

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

i mean, isn't it a force of nature for US at this point?

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Just a chud in a supermarket

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's especially funny because the biggest examples of landlord/capitalist repression in Actually Existing Socialist states (such as the mass Kulak deportations of the USSR) were not dictated by the state but by local soviets, it should be the wet dream of any anarchist (to which so many western "leftist" claim to adhere)

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Same with the cultural revolution and the excesses there. those were not done by the state by but para-military small cadres.

[–] Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Yeah, the shit was highly decentralized.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A paramilitary is still working on behalf of the government, and local bureaucrats [who are still part of the state] certainly mobilized paramilitaries to defend their position, and then there was a much greater degree of violence when the PLA was deployed to "quell" the violence of the conservative/rebel conflict. I think it's fair to say especially of the earlier "excesses" that while the broad movement was encouraged by Mao, that it was very much up to the rebel faction of Red Guards what exactly they did and the abuse committed by them was thereby pretty "grassroots".

you're right, paramilitary wasn't the right word but I agree, that was my point. That the excesses and violence came from below, not above.

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

A centralized state can take out CEOs more effectively but those apparatuses can be turned on regular citizens.

Not just can but are turned on them regularly, even in AES states, but that's a harsh truth not a lot of MLs are willing to face.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So true, bestie. DAE le People's Stick?

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a pathetic, intellectually impoverished attempt at a zinger that has nothing to do with what people here or Marxists in general actually believe, which explains why liberals eat it up.

How is it that you've been in the community for as long as you have and still are either unwilling or unable to engage with what the Marxists here believe? Granted, the majority of Marxists here are revisionists, but at least they still support the Marxist conception of communism even if their ideas about socialism are inadequate, but that inadequacy is fundamentally not as you portrayed it. Your portrayal was just empty grandstanding with a declaration that is contrary to what people here have said again and again and would readily tell you if asked. But you have surely seen that, haven't you? So why do you still say it?

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

oh look the resident squishy lib here to scold the tankies. don't you have some color revolution to defend?

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i've been here for a short time and already seen you defend Chomsky's honor, essentially call everyone here tankies without saying it outright & defend multiple color revolutions. That's just in 20 days lol. Call me whatever you want, doesn't change what you are.

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, yes, that is true, but I don't think there's an alternative. The state is a means for one class to oppress another, until class society is abolished you can't not have a state apparatus, so even if proletariat states fuck up sometimes and kill people they shouldn't it's the only means to end the dictatorship of the bourgeois.

[–] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is, doing away with the state altogether.

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah good luck with the bourgeois counter revolution if you do that.