this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
136 points (98.6% liked)

News

36831 readers
398 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Blue Cross and Blue Shield denied payment for the proton therapy Robert “Skeeter” Salim’s doctor ordered to fight his throat cancer. But he was no ordinary patient. He was a celebrated litigator. And he was ready to fight.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 72 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“Rich Lawyer Saves Himself From Orphan Crushing Machine”

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago

Barely saves himself.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh look its the death panels the republicans assured us didnt exist in the current healthcare system

[–] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The premium for the non death panel plan are much higher

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Yep. Called "out of pocket" in case anyone is in the market.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

yep. in the us if you are a top trial lawyer you can have rights akin to europeans.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The reason Blue Cross took this case all the way to court is simple, to send a message to anyone else denied "be prepared to spend millions fighting us, oh and you still have cancer so you'll likely die soon".

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago

I’m sure they figured since he was stage 4, he’d die and they wouldn’t have to deal with it anymore. The lawsuit was probably just stalling for time along with the message.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago

It's a win, but it feels so small when you think of all these other patients before him who could have been cured or lived longer with fewer side-effects in the dystopian hellhole that is the US health insurance ecosystem.

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's good for them, but makes you wonder just how many people get refused but lack the resources to fight this or end up settling or forgoing care.
That's sad

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 years ago

Corporate death panels kill thousands every year.

Medicare for all.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

We already knew it was thousands of people being denied cancer treatment before Obama care, and clearly the number still isn't down to zero.