this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
754 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10078 readers
2598 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 141 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not all of them are like this. At least one isn't.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 63 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Yeah...

I should have gotten all the files when they first came out. Is there an archive somewhere? All I've looked at is the one file that was changed to black out trump sucking the nipples of an underage person. That one had the text data replaced with a "-" for each block.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whaaaaaaa? I've never heard of this.

one file that was changed to black out trump sucking the nipples of an underage person.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 109 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 56 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks, but I'm sorry I asked:

[–] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What page is this? Or how can I verify it's real?

I tried googling for it the other day but couldn't find anything

Edit: did a bit of research. This was originally released unredacted in 2024 I think. https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf

Can't find the partially redacted version but the Epstein files are hard to search

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There's JMail which shows you his emails as of you're logged into his account. It also has other pages with files, photos, and even his Amazon purchase history.

[–] Jerkface@piefed.social 121 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I choose to believe that the people who did this aren't idiots, but heroes.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that much is obvious.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 109 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This has happened before. Back when I used to browse the armpit of the internet there were classified military docs that had the same technique used.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 73 points 2 weeks ago

I called it. Last week I said this :

I'm hoping for the old “it looks black until you select the text in the PDF” snafu.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

reddit is the armpit. 4chan is the unwashed taint.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I find it funny that it took a few days for this to come out. That's the very first thing I try if I see a big black box censoring something in a PDF or webpage is highlight to see if there's text under there (practice from reading SCP Wiki and various forums with fun formatting options). Heck I randomly highlight as I read enough I'd probably even find that it was incorrectly redacted without even trying

[–] AlternateHuman02@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

You can do that for SCPs!? I have been reading that forever and now I feel dumb

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Only some - default is just black boxes. I remember at least one where the redactions were removed on click per word.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 weeks ago

Some SCPs also have text with the same color as the background, if there is an oddly large space between text.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 99 points 2 weeks ago

I thought this was just gonna be made up, but it's true!!!

Go to this document and look for the text "Defendants Kahn and Indyke controlled and directed the activities of the other entities and personal bank accounts of Epstein" so you can get to the part with redactions.

Copy the redactions with Ctrl + C. Paste the redactions into either Notepad or another text editor that doesn't support advanced formatting like highlights.

Before:
image

After: (in notepad)
image

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 88 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I wonder if this was intentional? Maybe the FBI agent assigned to this file knew the whole censor thing was a huge fiasco and simply did this.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Deep down, I sincerely hope that it's malicious compliance in favor of getting the truth out.

That said, I absolutely will cop to dangerous blood-levels of copium here. Living in a kakistocracy so completely top-to-bottom incompetent as to do this by accident, is a level of peril that I'm not equipped to handle right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 83 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really hope this is malicious compliance and not incompetence...

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago

could be elaborated planted evidence

[–] doesit@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

teacher here. I blacked out words in a text for some test. kid held it up to the light. could read every word. was a pdf made in word.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 2 weeks ago

Lots of people on social media hide sensitive information with 90% opacity highlighter.

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 50 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Also, I wonder if you can use brute force for a lot of name reductions. You know, have a list of highly suspicious names, set the same font and size of the surrounding text, and try to see if it fits in the black box.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes yes you can let's spin up the old ml machine and a copy of python3 just like our grandfather's did

[–] ApertureUA@lemmy.today 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is going to look obvious in hindsight but perhaps people should have kept this to themselves until every single Epstein file had been released. Because now the DOJ is just going to do their best to fix the problem.

Not that that saying much these guys are the fucking keystone cops.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think there were probably several people that found this before that didn't say anything for this reason.

I posted it on here because once it's trending on TikTok and Bsky that ship has sailed

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Guys. This is called resistance. These people are govt employees. We go through literally yearly training on maintaining classified documents. This wasn't gross incompetence, it was fucking intentional. They knew they could do it because they knew leadership was too fucking stupid to check it properly. Believe it or not the govt is largely run by people, just like you and I. We are doing what we can where we can.

[–] Delusions@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's several pages that are just completely black that it's like they drew a big black square with paint or they just copy pasted the same page probably

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

they drew a big black square with paint

I have insider knowledge that that's exactly how this image was made. [OC] please share it because I think the format is funny and would love to see it catch on

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 weeks ago

Shame this fuck-up only happened in some of the pages.

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

we're all so blessed that autocracy is so stupid

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 24 points 2 weeks ago

There is nothing trumps admin can't fuck up. Its actually impressive.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

THEY DID IT AGAIN

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago

You can compare some of the redactions here

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Malicious compliance on the part of some DOJ intern maybe?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More than likely, you just had Eric doing these certain files. See Eric was pulled in from field work to help redact. Probably used word 2 or 3 times in his life and hates email.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We needed to be quiet about this until they released all the tranches so that they're all readable but nooo someone had to go and tweet about it.

[–] Cruel@programming.dev 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Happens all the time in the legal field. I once got a document in discovery that inverted the proper redactions. It was a roster of identifying information, all unredacted except for the actual relevant person in the case — that was redacted. 🤣

Redacting with black boxes over text is more common of a mistake than that.

load more comments
view more: next ›