Remember kids, every black line says the word Trump over and over and over. Spread the word.
this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
746 points (99.7% liked)
News
35724 readers
2597 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Supposedly there was about 300Gb of material, compared to about 3Gb released so far, so it's fair to assume the other 99% is videos of Trump fucking kids unless/until they release the rest to show otherwise.
I have no idea how the retractors live with themselves. What the fuck.
They're probably in on it, too. This administration surely drew like-minded people.
FYI a retractor is a surgical implement. I believe the word you were looking for is detractor.
FYI: Little 'b' means bit. Big 'B' means byte, a factor of eight larger. Basically, there's eight times as much Pedonald.
Why did all these people allow their photos to be taken? Like Clinton and Gates... "sure take my photo with this young woman so we can all remember what a great time we're having"
That was part of the deal. Mutual blackmail. It's been alluded to several times in the Maxwell testimonies.
Oh yeah that kinda makes sense i guess.
This is supposedly where the phrase “thick as thieves” comes from. If thieves were working together, they’d share stories of some of their previous crimes. So the group would all have blackmail on each individual member. The idea was that no individual person would rat, because then everyone they’ve worked with in the past would rat on them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Due to a system specifically designed by and for them and their fellow economical and political elites, they consider themselves untouchable by the consequences meant for mere mortals.
The worst part is that this megalomaniacal assumption is almost invariably proven correct 🤬
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump, active politicians, wealthy CEOs, connected public figures, and even Israeli spies and handlers.
Take your pick of Epstein associates that the US govt would opt to protect for reasons other than the public good or national security.
load more comments
(2 replies)
If you hold your screen up to a light you can see behind the black and it is literally just the word 'Trump'.
You might be joking, but in Slovakia there have been a few censored PDFs I've seen where they just used black highliter. Like, the text was still there.
I thought it was something rare when I found that, but someone on Reddit found same shit elsewhere too.
Just select the "censored" text and copy it.
Lmfao that is incredible
load more comments
(1 replies)
::: TRUMPTRUMPTRUMPTRUMP :::
Why hasn’t the actual document been leaked yet? At first I thought it was because it couldn’t be used if it was. But there’s literally a law ordering its release, so just dump it.
Of course they are. Anyone who expected something different is unbelievable naive.
There is a provision in the law that they can withhold anything related to "national security", so they can basically filter at will. You can't claim something you'll never see not to falling under that provision...
But they didn't say the redactions were due to national security. It'd be bullshit if they did, yeah, but they didn't. So they're still not complying.
Firstly: the partial / redacted release was entirely predictable.
Secondly, I dont understand where we are at now.
Is this impeachment going to be like all the others and be meaningless?
If JD Bimbo lady was charged and convicted wouldn't Trump just pardon her?
I can at least answer this one
Is this impeachment going to be like all the others and be meaningless?
Yes. No impeachment has ever had any teeth to it. This man broke the record for being the first to be impeached his first term. Then he broke another record by being the first to be impeached twice. Why not a third?
Impeachment of Trump is not yet on the table, but impeachment of Bondi and Trump's personal lawyer currently acting as Bondi's deputy, that's on the table and could result in a removal.
While it's true that no impeachment of a president has succeeded, the process has succeeded several times.
Also remember that while Trump is somehow bulletproof, his hanger ons enjoy zero protection.
They don't have protection when they stop being useful to him. They're still useful.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Impeachment of Trump is not yet on the table, but impeachment of Bondi and Trump’s personal lawyer currently acting as Bondi’s deputy, that’s on the table and could result in a removal.
Impeachment, maybe. Removal of any Republican would require too many Republican Senators to ever be feasible.
US Constitution, Article II, Section 2, Clause 1:
...he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
"Obviously the founding fathers meant to exclude ilegal impeachments. And since it would be from the crooked democrats and RINOs, any impeachment at this point would be an ilegal one." (Says Trump and the Supreme Court probably.)
Is this impeachment going to be like all the others and be meaningless?
Nah, don't worry: it's going to be even MORE meaningless, now that the fascist criminals are in full control of every single branch of government and may well succeed in remaking campaign and election laws so that it stays that way no matter how big the majority of people disapproving of them gets.
Every deletion is an admission.
Of course they're missing, did anybody thing anything else would happen? They'll release just enough salacious material to keep the voyeurs satisfied, but none of it will be actionable, at least not against MAGAs or Oligarchs. They'll keep the good stuff quarantined, or perhaps it's already been burned.
They even reported how FBI agents were taken off regular assignments to comb through for any mention of Dear Leader and rack up overtime. That was months ago.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yep. I bet the released materials cover a) Democrats and b) anyone else Trump dislikes.
That's incorrect. They DID release all of the most important and incriminating documents, 119 pages of them bundled in a single file. Here they are:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%203/EFTA00005586.pdf
🎶 No colours anymore, I want them to turn black 🎶
Is this for real?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Since we only know of a few "politically exposed individuals", I'm just going to have to assume that all the redactions are pertaining to them. Probably, primarily, Trump...since I doubt, if the rumors are lies or exaggerations, that Trump would go through so much trouble to protect Clinton.
In which case, why is Trump so afraid of all of these documents, to the point he has to black out nearly everything?
If he's truly innocent he shouldn't have any problem proving it, right?
If you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear, right?
Right, Taco?
So c'mon. It should be easy to weasel yourself out of this.
Unless...it's not.
I think Americans should assume every politician who takes money from AIPAC is involved and we should remove them all from office immediately throw them in prison without bail and try them for treason
Dems have access to all the files and can release them by reading them into the Congressional record.
Referring who for prosecution by who? Are the fascist child rapist protectors going to prosecute themselves?
Is this news? We all knew there would be fuckery going on with the DOJ release anyway. I wish I would've invested in black ink earlier this year.
since trump, republicans and politicial and financial backers are in it, its unlikely they ever plan of exposing them.
How did they not already figure out a response to this completely predictable outcome?
The justice department’s document dump this afternoon does not comply with Thomas Massie and my Epstein Transparency Act,
And what will you do about it? If history is any indication, nothing at all
load more comments
(1 replies)
They just didn't had enough time to photoshop Obama on the island. Seriously who knew that the country that invented "step"-familly porn was full of pedophiles?
Release the Epstein files, Trump!
What else have you got to fear. Everyone knows your a kiddie abuser and that Putin has a photo of you sucking off Bubba, how much worse could it possibly be?
Not surprised and always disappointed with this kind of shit. Everything blackened out has a name of a fucking politician or oligarch. Sick bastards!
view more: next ›