this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
658 points (98.5% liked)

politics

27045 readers
1816 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump can't focus long enough, even on his $400 million passion project

In October, Donald Trump traumatized all true patriots by tearing down the East Wing of the White House. The move, he claims, will clear the way for a ballroom for holding large events that are typically held in tents on the South Lawn. A debate immediately arose online over whether or not the next Democratic president should tear down the ballroom or keep it, albeit with the necessary extensive renovations to remove all the tackiness Trump brings to any project.

Two months later, it increasingly seems that such discussion was a wasted effort, as the chance this ballroom will actually be built is rapidly disappearing. Perhaps it could have if Trump had delegated the management of the project to someone competent, but that’s not what he did. Instead, the famously lazy and disorganized president decided to blow off his actual governance duties in favor of micromanaging a construction project he is incapable of handling. Finishing the ballroom in the next three years would be difficult for anyone, but it’s quickly becoming clear it will be nearly impossible for the famed real estate tycoon to pull it off.

The whole thing is a too-perfect symbol of Trump’s second administration: They are very good at breaking things, but they don’t know how to create anything of value.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 229 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I bet they can't get any contractor to work on that, because the Administration has already stiffed the demolition crew and nobody wants to touch a job they will never get paid for.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 188 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

You need to remember just how stupid some of his base is. There are pickme's out there who will 100% jump at the chance and think surely Trump won't stiff them.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 120 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

I'm actually amazed how he keeps finding new suckers after decades of doing it in the private sector and almost 10 years of doing it as President. The only ones that really came out ahead are the criminals that bought their pardons. Everyone else gets screwed one way or another.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Same here. Even back in 2010 and 2011 when I first started to look him up I was surprised that anyone could have trusted him or taken him seriously once the 90s rolled around. He should have been remembered as that conman from the 80s who is barely hanging onto life financially today.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He was always that shadey “businessman”, but that stupid reality show really put him back in the spotlight.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

On a personal level sure, but this isn't a job for a random one man operation.

At the top level you need a business and as much as business leaders love Trump (who doesn't love a useful idiot) they would never risk their bottom line for it.

All that and the fact that you would likely need a whole bunch of credentials to be building parts of the white house, or at least you likely used to.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually on second thought I'm an idiot.

If he actually builds that stupid ballroom he would have to pay for it. Much easier to just take the donations and leave a hole in the ground.

How could I not see such an obvious grift.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

So many faces offering themselves to the leopards

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I bet they can't get any contractor to work on that, because the Administration has already stiffed the demolition crew

I wanted this to be true... https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-east-wing-demolition-congress/?collection=471833 Unfortunately it's not

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow, when did snopes become an absolutely adfucked shithole. Besides, as far as I can tell that article is focused on Congress stopping the payments being false, not whether or not they've actually been paid, which wasn't clear to me.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 21 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

I wonder what a demolition crew does if you don't pay them. Other tradies will typically just rip out their work, but it's not like a demo crew can easily rebuild something they tore down.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Maybe that's Trump's big plan: don't pay the demolition crew and hope that they build a massive ballroom in protest.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 18 points 3 weeks ago
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago

A demo crew could keep working by mistake.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 13 points 3 weeks ago

Most contractors put a lien on your house.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That asshole hasnt paid any bills in decades, i cant believe anyone is still dumb enough to accept a job for this conman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Also, you try finding a construction crew on the east coast he hasn't personally stiffed already

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 128 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The fact that Trump just randomly tore down part of the White House still makes me laugh.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 weeks ago

Wait until you see the shit stains on the constitution.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago

True patriot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 85 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They are very good at breaking things, but they don’t know how to create anything of value.

Typical fascists. It's all grandiose and talk. If one reads the history of Nazi and fascist policies, they tend to wing it. Fascism is a reaction and antithesis to rationalism. In that sense, why would they have a plan at all? Okay, maybe with Heritage Foundation, they have a plan, but overall it is about regression which ultimately doesn't make sense apart from being an emotional reaction to caring about lgbt, migrants and social welfare.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 65 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)
[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This reads as way too competent a plan and scheme for Trump's admin.

I can't decide which is scarier, that Trump's admin is so incompetent they can't build a ballroom, or competent enough to plan and build a project like this while hiding it from the public

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago

Too competent for Trump, absolutely. But there are some pretty scary competent people behind him, whispering in his ear. As the video details, the people he's hired to work on his "ballroom", also happen to be some of the world's leading experts on building super secure, military grade data centers. There's not a lot of overlap between those things, so it's hard to imagine that it's just a random coincidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

LOL.

If you wanted a secret underground-anything why would you put it under the freakin whitehouse?

... and of all things a data centre, which would work the same if it were under sydney harbour, or you know... not underground at all, or well... just any of hundreds of existing data centres.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

The article does give a reason, it says it's to allow "executive oversight." As if Trump is going to waddle on down there and work on the servers himself.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 54 points 3 weeks ago

Trump has a track record of not paying people. Even court records to prove it. Blows my mind the demo team agreed to do this and now they’re not getting paid. No money, no worky

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago

Man who failed at casinos unable to build ballroom. Who could have forseen this!?!?!

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump can’t focus long enough, even on his $400 million passion project

Didn't it start out under $100 million?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 56 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It started at $200M and as “not affecting the existing structure” and will end as a $900M donation to the Trump presidential library, which will also not be built.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Plot twist: the Trump Presidential library is built in place of the East Wing

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Plot twist 2: The library will only be a small shelf because Trump is effectively illiterate and he will pocket the rest of the money.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

In a just world the library would be filled with the Epstein files and all of his executive orders with explanations about how they were illegal attempts to legislate from the oval office.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

Not unexpected. He handed all kinds of government jobs to the terminally incompetent.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So he vandalized the Whitehouse for nothing?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

No, he did it as a grift. I'm sure most of that money has already disappeared into his bank accounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think there's a pretty good argument laid out in this video that the ballroom is a literal cover for a bunkered database

https://youtu.be/VbJ4ilDvGyc

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

"There is no real direction here, neither lines of power nor cooperation. Decisions are never really made – at best they manage to emerge, from a chaos of peeves, whims, hallucinations and all around assholery."

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh... now it's $400 million?

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it grift? I wonder if it's grift. Nah, he's too upstanding of a guy to do that...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago

Was actually wondering about this the other night.

Are there any pictures of the current state of it? I kind of assume they just half tore down the east wing and then wandered off.

But, regardless: This was always a scam. Even if they build something, expect trump and his cronies to pocket the vast majority of the money that was supposed to be dedicated to it. Wouldn't be shocked if it just collapsed the first time a hurricane reached DC.

[–] JustTheWind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Crazy, you're telling me it was always a distraction? As a side note; It's nice to see that his taste in interior design always looks identical, no matter what. He's really committed to the overly gaudy, B-rated, villainous anime aristocrat archetype. It's the one thing he's weirdly consistent about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

They are very good at breaking things, but they don’t know how to create anything of value.

Yet they'll still come out richer than ever, what a world.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Did he "forget" to pay the contractors?

load more comments
view more: next ›