this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
131 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14205 readers
698 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The internet has become 3 massive multi-user blogs, each largely consisting of screenshots taken of the other two. This kind of blows, and not just for the usual reasons that may spring to mind.

Images are a terrible medium for online communication! Not everyone online uses a monitor. Any messages contained in a picture is straight up unacceptable without alt-text. It also makes it harder to find and fact check sources, or to spread a thought or idea further than yet another image upload. Copy/pasting text is just plain easier than downloading and uploading.

If you're going through the trouble of creating an image post, take an extra minuite to copy/past (or even transcribe) the source text into the alt-text submission. It's not much, but it goes a ways to improving how we use this blasted network!


https://uxdesign.cc/how-to-write-an-image-description-2f30d3bf5546

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hello. I'm a visual artist interested in incorporating alt-text into my work and making it more accessible for people.

I am not against mandatory requirement for it, but here are my main struggles with it:

  • Lack of a clear, easy to follow and objective guidelines for how to compose alt-text.

Once these directives have been established that also takes care of low-effort or wrongly applied alt-text, avoids there being favoritism in moderation process and served to educate us.

I understand your frustration with me and that is justifiable, but please help me be better. For instance this is a piece of art I made When I was uploading it I had spent a couple hours trying to figure out how to make appropriate text for it, before I made the cowardly choice to opt out completely when I became overwhelmed by information. At the same time a short alt-text for an artwork like this feels inappropriate. That made me choose to out out of including any, seeing as it is optional and I don't deserve the attention of anyone who would have otherwise engaged with my work when I am unwilling/unable to provide adequate alt-text for them.

I am not looking for excuses, but rather would like for us to work together and figure out a solution.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://uxdesign.cc/how-to-write-an-image-description-2f30d3bf5546

This object-action-context method described here is very useful. I'd recommend starting as concise as possible, then adding in key details.

So, for your art piece, maybe start with something like

A figure facing the horizon. A big tiger descends from the sky, threatening the city sprawling between them.

If I were to add a few more details, I might do

A figure beside a river, facing the horizon. A big tiger descends from the sky, its tail wrapping around a red sun, threatening the city sprawling between them. A golden trout leaps from the river.

And the fact that this is an artistic work is itself context! This means more detail is welcome and helpful!

[–] RedSturgeon@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Thanks I appreciate you sharing the resources. Very informative!

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I have tried to write alt text for images but am discouraged by a) how difficult it is to adequately convey the point of an image, and b) then knowing few if any people will see it.

Things that make alt text more likely to happen:

  • Alt text should be visible to everyone. Maybe it could go over-top of the blurred images. Or something.
  • When you add an image via the toolbar button or paste into edit box, it should have placeholder alt text like "Image description here"; but that placeholder should get stripped out if it is not edited by the user, to avoid meaningless default alt
  • the markdown Help page that you can get by pressing the (?) button on the far right of the editing toolbar (in default web layout) should describe the use of alt text
  • images that are grabbed automatically when posting a URL should include alt text if available. For example this recent post contains a banner image, pulled from the original page. On hexbear, the proxied image has no alt, but on the original page, if you right-click and use "Inspect" you see alt="A row of teenagers all using their phones."

Images are a terrible medium for online communication

that's a silly thing to say. even the alt text you provided for your own screenshot is way less good at conveying the intended message than the screenshot itself. By looking at the image I can instantly know how to add alt text when uploading an image as a post. But reading the alt text gives a hint, at best.

I've tried before to find guides about how to write alt text but never found anything that suits this kind of environment. It's straight forward if you are talking about interface elements etc but hardly a trivial request when it comes to creative stuff, jokes, or images where inferences are supposed to be made.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Images are a terrible medium for online communication

maaaybe i was a bit hyperbolic.

This guide Edie linked is very helpful: https://uxdesign.cc/how-to-write-an-image-description-2f30d3bf5546

[–] Edie@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Alt text can also be added to inline images. Per the commonmark spec: ![alt] (/url "title")

See also https://uxdesign.cc/how-to-write-an-image-description-2f30d3bf5546 from the disabled comm sidebar.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 14 points 2 days ago

I appreciate this instructional post, thank you!

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago

I'm guilty of not always providing alt text. But JSYK posting images doesn't require downloading them and uploading them from my file system. Users can just paste an image from their clipboards into the upload box or comment box and it will automatically host it on Hexbear and insert the link.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If we're stickying this thread why don't we just make it a mandatory field in submissions? Just remove the optional, maybe change "optional" to a link to a help thread showing best practices for image description in this field.

Also this actually seems like a real world use-case for AI, an app that uses AI to create descriptions for images for those with sight disabilities as and when required. The kind of genuinely positive use-case the technology ought to be implemented for. (disclaimer, i have not checked whether any of the AIs are actually good at this)

[–] CARCOSA@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Making the change to mandatory would be a feature request for the toggle box and require coding. I'm happy to help anyone interested get in contact with the lemmy development team if this is something they are interested in.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could a link to this guide be put next to the alt text box without too much extra work? Seems like the general sentiment is that people want to use the optional feature, but don't feel like they know how.

https://uxdesign.cc/how-to-write-an-image-description-2f30d3bf5546

[–] CARCOSA@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

I think in that case it would still be some custom coding on the hexbear-ui end or submitting the code to upstream lemmy.

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it's mandatory then it'll get filled with low effort junk much of the time.

[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Better than no alt text, no?

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

Why would that be?

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Is there a way to alt text when you post an image in a reply?

EDIT: Did it work? Is this how I alt text? A blurry black cat is frightened by a nearby hand.

"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!"

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why does your void look like Tom Servo lol

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

He watches too many terrible B movies.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

I'm personally not dependent on alt-texts but I'm checking every single image you all post on here, quietly judging you for the absence of alt-texts and relishing their presence.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago

I wish that alt text were easier to see. By default, there’s no indication that there’s alt text set for this image, and at least in the browser I’m currently using, there’s no easy way to copy the alt text.

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

I didn't know we could do this and will do it from now on

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I usually try to do this now due to accessibility concerns. As @Edie@hexbear.net said, when embedding an image in a comment, the alt text goes inside the [].

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

When I was testing it out, it seemed like it was actually the "title" that was getting applied as alt text.

Not actually the alt text, I can’t see this on my current browser except when showing the post source

E: ok, I switched to a computer to double-check the source. The title is actually the title and not the alt text, but that’s all I can easily see on mobile. The alt text is different, but even on the computer only the title is actually easy for me to see without looking at the page source.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You're right that it appears to reverse title and alt-text from the commonmark spec. That might be a bug or unintended deviation.

I know @Edie@hexbear.net has tested post images through a screen reader, but I'm not sure if she has tested comment images. She might know more.

Edit: actually, it's not reversed in the source. It's just that browsers seem to like to show the title text rather than the alt text.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I took a look from a computer at the source. The fields are mapped properly, but:

  • on the post the alt text is copied to both fields
  • in my emoji example, each field has different content

And regardless of whether I’m looking from a computer or mobile, the alt text is hard or impossible to see, while the title text is potentially visible.

[–] Edie@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yes, that is how it works. Title has problems.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

Use of the title attribute is highly problematic for:

  • People using touch-only devices

Except I’m having the exact opposite experience boohoo

Both? Both? Both. Both is good.

[–] Edie@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In some contexts it seems that orca will say both. First the alt, then it adds "image", then the title.

Edit: But in others not, it will say just the alt.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] XxFemboy_Stalin_420_69xX@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

didn't even realize alt text was a thing on this site tbh, i have no idea how i would go about seeing it if i wanted to

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On mobile, pressing and holding on an image shows me the title text, which matches the alt text set for an image post. On desktop, hovering my mouse over an image shows the title text. I can’t find an easy way to actually see the alt text if it’s not the same as the title.

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

on desktop the button between upvote and reply is "view source" and shows you all the markup including any alt and title text.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

Haha, yeah, sorry, that wasn’t super clear, but I meant in cases where there isn’t a view source button, which on mobile is most images on the internet, and on desktop depends on whether you consider reading HTML an “easy” way to see alt text.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've always tried to use alt-text when possible, but for inline images I've been confused about whether to put the description between the brackets or in quotes in the parentheses. If this thread is anything to go off of, I guess I should do both, or?

There's also the thing about how to write good descriptions. I'll have to take a good look through the guide that Edie linked in this thread; I skimmed through it just now and it's got some good advice.

In a sense it almost feels "easier" to write AD for a video than for a still image, because with video you generally have a hard limit for how long your description can be — just however long the space is between dialog — and you also oftentimes have less you have to describe if the sound design does it for you. But when you're describing an image, you can just go on and on and on and on and on however long you find reasonable for the target audience. And so I often do.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Edie@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The correct thing to make alt text available for screen reader is between the brackets. In quotes in the parentheses is for the title, and while it can be used for screen readers it is usually only done as a last resort. ~~If you want to make the alt text available for non-accessibility reasons, adding it to the title will allow mouse users to hover over and see it, and for (at least some) mobile users to hold down on the image and get it (see example below), with caveats, e.g. the title gets cut off in my Android browser.~~ Alt text can also be gotten through view source.


This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As I was saying, both is best, since I often put extra context in the alt-texts that people might want to know regardless of vision.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Extra context should go in the title, description should go in the the alt.

Getting the same text read twice isn't great.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KnilAdlez@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago

You are completely correct, though I must admit to my own failings when it comes to alt text description.

[–] Arahnya@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

Image descriptions are useful to me, sometimes I don't understand the context of the image being used in relation to the post. I write alt text for a multitude of reasons!

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Monkeys paw, every image gets "Pig with Poop on its Balls" as the alt text

Small Black Pig sitting in a box of beer with Poop on its Balls

Note: Why is is that this image has alt text (check the source), but when I long click it on mobile I only get the URL?

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago

See my various posts about the title vs. alt behavior - a long press shows you the title text.

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago

I keep forgetting to set the actual alt-text, so I appreciate the reminder—I'll try to do better going forward. I always try to provide an image description inside a spoiler tag in the post/comment (example). This blog post (shared by @Edie@hexbear.net previously as well as in this thread) actually says

Most social media platforms these days offer an alt text option. From what I have heard from the community, it’s actually better to put the description in the caption instead. This way, it’s also visible to screen magnifier users and sighted people who might need or benefit from the description. (It’s actually unclear to me whether we should also add a full description or abbreviated version in the alt tag if we are adding to the caption. If you have thoughts or ideas about this, please reach out! Contact info at the bottom).

The secondary benefit of this approach is that it also allows for copy-pasting so that people can easily quote/re-share the content of a text post.

One thing I'm unsure about is how accessible spoiler tags are. Is it straightforward for someone using a screenreader to identify that the spoiler tag is there and expand it? I use spoiler tags just to take up less space, but if it's an accessibility issue I'd much rather people have to scroll a bit more if the spoiler tag is a significant complication for the people who need the description the most.

[–] FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

100% agree on this. This also strikes me as something that AI would actually be good at. I’d be shocked if there aren’t screen readers or other software that have an LLM built in to describe images and answer questions about them or software at least working towards that. Obviously it may not always be perfect and bespoke alt text is going to be better since the LLM might not get the gist of certain memes etc but yeah seems like a tailor made use case as opposed to the current shoehorning of AI into nearly everything without any real thought so that half the internet becomes pure slop..

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

I think one of the core problems of using AI is that it doesn't know why the image is there, so even when talking about a relatively straightforward image (i.e. not some meme which requires a bunch of background knowledge) I have serious doubts that it would focus on the pertinent details even if we assume it makes no actual mistakes. Obviously, it's nice for people to have something they can use when alt text isn't present, but it should be a backup rather than the first line option.

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

Mods, could we make that fireld mandatory?

[–] Cat_Daddy@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago

I love this; can mobile app users get a pass until dessalines/whoever gets a patch in place that lets us add the alt text?

load more comments
view more: next ›