this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
490 points (99.8% liked)

movies

2367 readers
141 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 106 points 4 weeks ago

To bad the government is fully compromised.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 47 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I for one thing the merger is a great idea. Why shouldn't the company famous for cancelling shows after one season merge with the company famous for burying completed movies for a tax write-off?

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I hate this deal but I am hoping Harry Potter gets cancelled after one season

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Regardless of what JK Rowling is Harry Potter is a international sensation. It's insane that they're trying to remake it when it's what less than 20 years old.

There's plenty of good IP out there why don't they make something of that.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

She's remaking it so she can cut the cast out of the profits. Her three wayward children are getting residuals. And I think Rupert just gives all his directly to trans charities.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not that insane considering the target audience are children and teenagers. People who are 14 years old now weren't even born yet by the time Deathly Hallows part 2 came out, and I bet they'd rather watch a remake than their parent's old DVDs.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People who are 14 now need to be told that Harry Potter is just that racist old grandma's uncool neoliberalism wank.

Teens who are into Harry Potter should be treated the same way we treat teens who are into Atlas Shrugged

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Train them to run for Congress?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no, netflix likes licences to print money just like any other corp.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe, but the combination of backlash against Rowling herself with the fact that it's being remade so soon, which may create a "this isn't my Harry Potter" type effect, may mean this isn't as successful as they're hoping.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

I mean maybe Netflix will add those completed movies.

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean the alternative was paramount buys them...which is worse since the ellisons are pretty far right.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 weeks ago

Such a cool timeline where the options are a consolidation merger that eliminates competition and creates an unfair advantage, destroying jobs, enriching the wealthy, or the same thing but with Larry Ellison who will obviously do it with a hard right wing slant (as opposed to the other option just quietly doing that)

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Assuming that no merger is not an option, I guess?

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Considering wb put the company up for sale, yes that seems unlikely.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats why this regime is blessing it, of course.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago

Don't forget the incoming bribes!

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, I get it but the only people bidding on WBD was Skydance (Ellison). The options were Skydance, Disney, a vulture fund, or Netflix. That's probably why Netflix even decided to bid. Nobody wanted WBD.

Consolidation should have never been allowed, but now that the beast that is Disney exists, there is very little argument that could succeed against the WBD purchase.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

ITS SKYDANCE/ and the saudis.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This will make them too big to fail. Everyone can RELAX now.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Relax. Don't do it, when you wanna suck it to it:

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

I wonder if we will at least publicly name the folks who proposed this clearly illegal merger? Just for the record?

[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

The worst part is that WB owns HBO which is probably one of few which didn’t transformed into shit. I wish they could buyout themselves

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I myself am looking forward to the day when Buy n Large takes over every aspect of our lives.

Capitalism is like a long warm hug by an elephant. Eventually the elephant goes to sleep on you.

Remember kids: "we all support this system together".

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

not if we stop bnl from doing so.

[–] philipsdirk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

All you need, and so much more

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Antitrust. How quaint.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago

Wish granted, the Trump administration blocks the deal with Netflix only so that Larry Ellison can have it instead.

There's really no win in this situation.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

"Antitrust is woke!"


Donny the Destroyer

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Look at the writers guild of America pretending they don't live in a fascist dictatorship where nothing matters but profits. How quaint.

The chances of this getting blocked under antitrust laws is roughly equivalent to me hitting oil in my back garden.

[–] BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

No, they totally know that. We all know that. And I agree that the chances of antitrust law being used for its stated purpose here is low. Do you think they shouldn't have released this statement?

Why do you disdain people suffering under capitalism?

[–] QuietGenesis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Its only indie, foreign, and old films for me from here on out. I'm done with all the corporate slop.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hold on to your hat, they are going to reboot all of your favorite classic films... And Chris Pratt will star in ALL OF THEM...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

He's so cool.

[–] Srootus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Does this mean Netflix own all the Warner music stuff too?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Who did they want to buy it?

[–] TheImpressiveX@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

Ideally, no one at all.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bring it on! Things must get a lot worse before they're going to get better.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Bold of you to believe that things are going to get better.