this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
490 points (99.8% liked)

movies

3055 readers
262 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 106 points 2 months ago

To bad the government is fully compromised.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I for one thing the merger is a great idea. Why shouldn't the company famous for cancelling shows after one season merge with the company famous for burying completed movies for a tax write-off?

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I hate this deal but I am hoping Harry Potter gets cancelled after one season

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Regardless of what JK Rowling is Harry Potter is a international sensation. It's insane that they're trying to remake it when it's what less than 20 years old.

There's plenty of good IP out there why don't they make something of that.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

She's remaking it so she can cut the cast out of the profits. Her three wayward children are getting residuals. And I think Rupert just gives all his directly to trans charities.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not that insane considering the target audience are children and teenagers. People who are 14 years old now weren't even born yet by the time Deathly Hallows part 2 came out, and I bet they'd rather watch a remake than their parent's old DVDs.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People who are 14 now need to be told that Harry Potter is just that racist old grandma's uncool neoliberalism wank.

Teens who are into Harry Potter should be treated the same way we treat teens who are into Atlas Shrugged

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Train them to run for Congress?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, netflix likes licences to print money just like any other corp.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago

Maybe, but the combination of backlash against Rowling herself with the fact that it's being remade so soon, which may create a "this isn't my Harry Potter" type effect, may mean this isn't as successful as they're hoping.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

I mean maybe Netflix will add those completed movies.

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean the alternative was paramount buys them...which is worse since the ellisons are pretty far right.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 months ago

Such a cool timeline where the options are a consolidation merger that eliminates competition and creates an unfair advantage, destroying jobs, enriching the wealthy, or the same thing but with Larry Ellison who will obviously do it with a hard right wing slant (as opposed to the other option just quietly doing that)

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Assuming that no merger is not an option, I guess?

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

Considering wb put the company up for sale, yes that seems unlikely.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thats why this regime is blessing it, of course.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago

Don't forget the incoming bribes!

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I get it but the only people bidding on WBD was Skydance (Ellison). The options were Skydance, Disney, a vulture fund, or Netflix. That's probably why Netflix even decided to bid. Nobody wanted WBD.

Consolidation should have never been allowed, but now that the beast that is Disney exists, there is very little argument that could succeed against the WBD purchase.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

ITS SKYDANCE/ and the saudis.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This will make them too big to fail. Everyone can RELAX now.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Relax. Don't do it, when you wanna suck it to it:

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 months ago

I wonder if we will at least publicly name the folks who proposed this clearly illegal merger? Just for the record?

[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

The worst part is that WB owns HBO which is probably one of few which didn’t transformed into shit. I wish they could buyout themselves

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I myself am looking forward to the day when Buy n Large takes over every aspect of our lives.

Capitalism is like a long warm hug by an elephant. Eventually the elephant goes to sleep on you.

Remember kids: "we all support this system together".

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

not if we stop bnl from doing so.

[–] philipsdirk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

All you need, and so much more

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Antitrust. How quaint.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago

Wish granted, the Trump administration blocks the deal with Netflix only so that Larry Ellison can have it instead.

There's really no win in this situation.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

"Antitrust is woke!"


Donny the Destroyer

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look at the writers guild of America pretending they don't live in a fascist dictatorship where nothing matters but profits. How quaint.

The chances of this getting blocked under antitrust laws is roughly equivalent to me hitting oil in my back garden.

[–] BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

No, they totally know that. We all know that. And I agree that the chances of antitrust law being used for its stated purpose here is low. Do you think they shouldn't have released this statement?

Why do you disdain people suffering under capitalism?

[–] QuietGenesis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its only indie, foreign, and old films for me from here on out. I'm done with all the corporate slop.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hold on to your hat, they are going to reboot all of your favorite classic films... And Chris Pratt will star in ALL OF THEM...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

He's so cool.

[–] Srootus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Does this mean Netflix own all the Warner music stuff too?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who did they want to buy it?

[–] TheImpressiveX@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Ideally, no one at all.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bring it on! Things must get a lot worse before they're going to get better.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Bold of you to believe that things are going to get better.