this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
490 points (99.8% liked)

movies

2376 readers
215 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 47 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I for one thing the merger is a great idea. Why shouldn't the company famous for cancelling shows after one season merge with the company famous for burying completed movies for a tax write-off?

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I hate this deal but I am hoping Harry Potter gets cancelled after one season

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Regardless of what JK Rowling is Harry Potter is a international sensation. It's insane that they're trying to remake it when it's what less than 20 years old.

There's plenty of good IP out there why don't they make something of that.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

She's remaking it so she can cut the cast out of the profits. Her three wayward children are getting residuals. And I think Rupert just gives all his directly to trans charities.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not that insane considering the target audience are children and teenagers. People who are 14 years old now weren't even born yet by the time Deathly Hallows part 2 came out, and I bet they'd rather watch a remake than their parent's old DVDs.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

People who are 14 now need to be told that Harry Potter is just that racist old grandma's uncool neoliberalism wank.

Teens who are into Harry Potter should be treated the same way we treat teens who are into Atlas Shrugged

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Train them to run for Congress?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no, netflix likes licences to print money just like any other corp.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe, but the combination of backlash against Rowling herself with the fact that it's being remade so soon, which may create a "this isn't my Harry Potter" type effect, may mean this isn't as successful as they're hoping.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 weeks ago

I mean maybe Netflix will add those completed movies.