this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

742 readers
488 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I ain't reading all that.

Free Palestine.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i-think-that

all clothing should be black

[–] Owl@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

just gotta have black cats

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Cat hair on black is even better than just black.

[–] reaper_cushions@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Hello Pol Pot!

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To look your best you need to create a seductive aura. This aura is part of the mental image other people have of you, and it builds up from a constellation of many different hints.

Beige is anti-sexy, so wearing a beige bra EVEN ONCE throws dust in your aura and makes it dimmer. And once your aura dims, the decrease in your seductiveness persists even when you're NOT wearing your ugly beige bra.

wut

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

Beige is anti-sexy, so wearing a beige bra EVEN ONCE throws dust in your aura and makes it dimmer

This is GILF fetish erasure.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

Very clearly an engineered post to drive people to his blog/book he's writing or whatever.

[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

LOL the paternalistic entitlement he has that all women have to be maximally sexy at all times. If you ever wear sheer garments with a bra, matching it with your skin tone is nice to avoid drawing attention to it (if that is your goal).

[–] Twongo@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

how do you reach this stage of porn addiction?

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Genuinely dumbfounded at this one. This is like one of those internet personalities you discover in 2006 and they eventually become a meme. After some digging, I'm even more bewildered. They are cited by an odd blog post on masculine beauty and are referred to as her/she. The blog on masculine beauty, not written by Senalic, sounds like a drawn out 4chan post about how men are unfairly judged by women. But back to J Senalic being a woman.

The only way J Sanilac is a woman is if she was a pick me for misogynists. I can't cant even fathom Marget Thatcher talking about women the way J does. It seems distinctly male. They used to go by "EvilVizier" and called themselves a beauty poster. However it seems that account was about something really gross and weird. They seem to like to role play as an orientalist character that enslaves women. J Senalic has a story on their blog that is a fictional memoir of someone who is a human trafficker for "the Sultan." He posts lots of nude women from old oil paintings while writing this weird fetish shit out. So this fantasy about sexual exploitation is tied into this idea of true feminine beauty. He even wrote a whole tirade on historical beauty and how no fatties were allowed in response to people posting fertility art as example of body acceptance.

"J Senalic" seems like a nome de plume based on some weird love for orientalist literature and art. They write historical fiction like a 10 year old whose favorite movie is Aladdin and that's all they know about the middle east. Just really bizarre.

He also seems to have a bit of a wry streak, like someone trying to copy Maddox but for inane boomer shit. He wrote a blog post about eliminating attached garages in the same smug, wry style that every blogger in 2004 used. Then wrote an epic rant about why low-density housing is the best. Again, just really weird stuff. Someone stuck out of time. Giving this person social media is a crime.

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They mention being female, they talk about trans people (and potentially being trans?), and a lot of replies accuse them of being trans. They could just be a weird rage baiter though.

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If they are then the self-loathing is off the charts. Part of their essay on feminine beauty is about what women can learn from fictional depictions of women (anime, video games) and then even saying that AI women also have something to teach. Even if you bypass the misogyny, they don't seem to have any human dignity nor are willing to see it in others.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

There's a certain trans person that does try to replicate being a woman based off of media depictions, it's very brain broken but not uncommon

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you're "impersonating" being a woman even while being shitty odds are you're trans or gender diverse in some way imo, general pop doesn't do shit like this

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

This is like one of those internet personalities you discover in 2006 and they eventually become a meme

They give me the same vibe as the human pet guy

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Genuinely dumbfounded at this one. This is like one of those internet personalities you discover in 2006 and they eventually become a meme. After some digging, I'm even more bewildered. They are cited by an odd blog post on masculine beauty and are referred to as her/she. The blog on masculine beauty, not written by Senalic, sounds like a drawn out 4chan post about how men are unfairly judged by women. But back to J Senalic being a woman.

He also seems to have a bit of a wry streak, like someone trying to copy Maddox but for inane boomer shit. He wrote a blog post about eliminating attached garages in the same smug, wry style that every blogger in 2004 used. Then wrote an epic rant about why low-density housing is the best. Again, just really weird stuff. Someone stuck out of time. Giving this person social media is a crime.

Yeah, they really have that old school Internet crank vibe. I thought it was originally some AI ragebait, but I think their blog is genuine and the tweets are a bit too idiosyncratic for AI.

They have a blog article shitting on AI except it's full of em-dashes, which makes me think they either are one of those people who overuse em-dashes or they thought it would be funny to use AI to write an article denouncing AI.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Incels love pretending to be women to try and trick women into behaving more like their ideal and/or sleep with them. But since they've never actually talked to a woman, it always comes across as really fake and strange.

[–] whiskers165@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I mean this guy is a giant creep but I still would not be caught dead wearing or owning beige lingerie. Great taste but disgusting execution, Jesus Christ.

The only time I ever as much hate online as this guy was posting, "TOOL is just SmashMouth for virgins," on a TOOL Facebook fan page a decade ago. And I was on the receiving end of the slurs, not the one doling 'em out

Yeah I agree and also I want to extend this criticism to old men wearing tan/beige coats

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean this guy is a giant creep but I still would not be caught dead wearing or owning beige lingerie. Great taste but disgusting execution, Jesus Christ.

Yeah, beige clothes being ugly ultimately isn't the contested part here at all. It's the gooner way he goes about it, and all his assumptions about people wearing bras to be sexy. It's just like the nose ring thing, men aren't the point. Bras exist to hold your boobs up, and aren't inherently about sexualization.

A lot of the women that are really angry about his posting probably wouldn't wear beige underwear when they're trying to be sexy either. A lot of men would probably still goon to his beige underwear photos.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

chefs-kiss they don't make them like they used to

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know, they say leftism is the politics of envy….and they’re half right.

Damn, I envy that this guy’s life is so good that colors on women’s underwear registers as a problem for him. I want everyone to be so privileged that such things are their problems, not whether or not they can afford rent.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago
[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

I mean, he talks about testing it out on himself, so maybe it's a weird egg

[–] mendiCAN@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago

wow it's not a bit. they're dead serious. quality entertainment, but I'm left wondering what beige-tinged darkness hurt him so

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

His telegram if anyone wants to bully this dude directly in his phone notifications.

https://t.me/jsanilac