272
submitted 1 year ago by NoDoy@lemmy.ml to c/android

It's happening!!!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 83 points 1 year ago

Now, if only Google wasn't a cunt about allowing other apps for rcs, that would be great

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago

Imagine cross-platform RCS support built into Signal. 🥹💭

[-] JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Man that would be nice. Could finally have it be all in one again like Google Hangouts before it was killed.

[-] otacon239@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

I still miss Hangouts + Voice

[-] JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Same I legit think it could've been Google's actual competition to iMessage but they fumbled the bag so badly it's crazy.

[-] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

Oh that'd be nice but since no more SMS in Signal I can't see it going back in (unless they reversed course?)

[-] madis@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IIRC their point was that SMS is insecure, so they don't want people using SMS in Signal to think that this is Signal. With RCS, they could do what Apple will - be interoperable while providing extras with own platform (iMessage).

Admittedly, that doesn't sound like enough reason to reimplement SMS and RCS alone would still be kind of inconvenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NoDoy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Samsung Messages is the only other, right?

[-] dandroid@dandroid.app 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Technically anyone who makes an android device could have their own. The API is a system-level API, so any app signed with system certificates (aka, any app packaged with your phone) can use it. Any app you download from the play store can't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] aiman 32 points 1 year ago

I have faith in Apple, it'll be difficult but they'll find a way to do this that still maintains all the toxicity towards green bubbles that they've worked so hard to cultivate.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

They are literally keeping the green bubbles for RCS users lmao

[-] svellere@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Right, but the features will be mostly on-par with iMessage. The only thing you'd be missing out on are chat effects and the 3D avatar things. The stigma will stay for a little bit, but probably die out over time because the stigma developed in the first place not due to the color of the bubble, but because the color of the bubble meant worse features.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's going to be irrelevant. It will still be separate from iMessage. Different bubbles will still exist. People who aren't using SMS now (Europe) will continue to not use RCS either. And Apple's implementation of RCS will be independent from Goggle's and not 100% compatible.

In fact I suspect the whole thing is an attempt to skirt the upcoming EU interconnection regulations. Apple thinks that if they say "look we've implemented RCS and it's technically interoperable with other RCS implementations" they'll get a pass — or be able to assign blame on other vendors for not interconnecting with them and drag the whole thing for a few more years.

[-] NoDoy@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Glad that you emphasized Europe. Here in the states where iMessage is dominant, it'll make a difference.

At the end of the day it's not a bad thing. I'm also waiting for details with compatibility to be ironed out, but it's a start.

Just surprised at the whole negative energy with this announcement considering this was a "when pigs fly" or "when hell freezes over" sorta thing. Again, it's a start and hopefully Google opens it up (even if forcibly by the EU) down the road.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I care. Switched to iPhone and RCS is the one thing I miss.

[-] NoDoy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly. It's in no way a bad thing for anyone. We'll see the way that it's implemented. It's the first step. r/Android is rearing its head here. Let's enjoy this for the moment

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

People who aren’t using SMS now (Europe) will continue to not use RCS either.

We're all already on RCS in Europe. And you know what? Nobody cares. Or truly knows. Nobody opens their Messages, iMessage, whateveritbemessage.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't know we were on RCS which proves the point I guess. I do open my texts though.

[-] GenEcon@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe for 2FA. But for messaging with friends and colleagues? Everyone uses Signal, Whatsapp or telegram.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

We aren't on RCS. The only SMS app that even uses Google's RCS is Google's Messages. Assuming you had that app preinstalled (which isn't necessarily true for all manufacturers or all models), it comes off by default and you have to enable it (it's called "chat features").

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jcarax@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

This would be great if I could actually use it in AOSP without Google's own app, and view/reply to RCS conversations on my laptop using a 3rd party application. Open the APIs, Google, or you're just blowing hot air.

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

+1 And why XMPP was always a better answer.

[-] jcarax@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I have a lot of mixed feelings about it, but I'm tending towards some forced adherence to standards. Or at least interoperability through open federation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have no doubts it will be implemented in a way that still benefits Apple and its ecosystem. Also to help their cause to keep iMessage locked into Apple devices with that EU ruling. Still, this is great news.

[-] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think Apple will need (or want) to do anything "malicious" since Apple is implementing RCS the standard which between the carriers and Google mismanaging and fragmenting messaging for years - see: X carrier phones can only send RCS messages to X carrier phones, Google's implementation is not the RCS standard and is partially proprietary - it'll take a while to get S.S. RCS, The Standard steered right.

I hope Apple's involvement is ironically a kick in the butt to get everyone on the same page and get a standard rather than the current "Google iMessage" solution.

Edit: Typo

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Are there any FOSS RCS apps? Should this be the 'open' standard the EU are enforcing?

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There aren't any because there's no point. And no, I hope this won't be the standard.

There are two things called "RCS": there's a theoretical specification; and exactly one implementation that has managed to get any real traction, and that's purely because it's pushed by Google.

The RCS spec was attempted by various companies and all implementations died when they figured out they'd have to make them compatible and open their servers to each other. Even if they wanted to it would be a mess.

SMS succeeded because it doesn't need servers, it's just pieces of text being sent around.

Google is the only one still pushing their RCS because they figure if they tie their version of it into Android they will own the messaging on Android forever. They don't want interoperability either.

If Google gets their way and their RCS becomes the EU standard it will lock the EU into a proprietary platform from one of the most vile data predators in the world.

There's no point in making a FOSS implementation of RCS because the spec is highly dependent on who runs the servers. The only way it would make sense is if the EU would dictate a spec and force everybody to follow it and open their servers. In that take on things FOSS would be ideal.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Is the Google version of RCS not compatible with someone else's RCS, then?

As in, I take it nobody else wants to run a server because it costs money, right? But suppose I did, and I had an RCS app to run with it. Would someone using my app be able to send a message to an Android user using Google Messages?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kaidelorenzo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago

would much prefer matrix as the standard

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

Now we wait another 10 years for Apple to support third-party RCS apps I guess?

[-] XbSuper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

RCS is like sms2.0, it supports better group chats, larger higher quality file transfers, read receipts... That sorta thing

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

For carriers it is a way to extend the (in my opinion outdated) idea of carrier-based chat system.

For Google it is a way to switch messaging on Android to their proprietary app, at least for some time, as other of their projects falied.

For users it is a way for people using Android certified by Google to normally message people using iPhone and it's preinstalled chat app.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

confused messengers user noises

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
272 points (95.0% liked)

Android

17831 readers
134 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS