this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
411 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

12292 readers
354 users here now

News related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷[Combat] videos containing footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

No AI slop

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mirror

Another video of the failed test and rocket explosion at the Yasny test site near Orenburg

Another version from Ukrainian OSINT analysts states, that the footage may show the launch of the UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missile with the "Avangard" unit.

https://files.catbox.moe/fytslz.mp4

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 103 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, if the two continents are only 100 feet apart, it worked great.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago

For when Russia targets Sarah Palins house in Alaska?

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 64 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Sadly, the technicians that would have been able to prevent this were blown up by drones during a failed meatwave offensive in Ukraine last year.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

And all that unnecessary "maintenance" money was siphoned off to an offshore account in 1996.

Who would have thought soviet ICBMs were so fragile!

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

It seems any time I read about some big Soviet (USSR) research/innovation/accomplishment, the scientists and engineers making those achievement were.. Ukranian. Makes me wonder if Putin wants to conquer Ukraine to indenture all of that talent again because Russia has been stagnating since the collapse of the USSR.

That's just a theory of mine, take it as you will.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 55 points 4 months ago (5 children)

They should've consulted me. I have thousands of hours in KSP. They needed more struts. Possibly atleast two more boosters.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

They probably haven't unlocked enough of the tech tree yet for those.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Nah, i think it is aerodynamically unstable. Something with the weight balance. I would put 4, 8, 16 fins to stabilize it, until i finally put an overpowered engine because no use.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Fake news, this was a successful test for an extremely short range missile

/S

[–] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

NATO propagandists will try to bury this footage because they don't have a hypersonic missile that can turn in such a small radius like this. Besides that, with this newly demonstrated capability, the odds that Ukraine could shoot down this missile drop just about all the way to zero!

[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No comerade, this video is actually fireworks in Russia. The Westoids are so jealous of our mighty fireworks they call it failed ICBM test.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why does everyone like to turn the camera away when the thing is about to blow up?

ICBM the cameraman

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Tbh, bar the little twitch at the explosion point it was very good camera work. Not moving too much and keeping it all in frame

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Looks like the same issue I remember seeing on a different launch, I think also Russian, where a tech installed a sensor upside down. That thing had no idea where it was or was going.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 4 months ago

If only the missile knew where it wasn't

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] froh42@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

Intra Courtyard Ballistic Missile

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I got over a thousand hours in KSP. The issue is the pointy end has to point at space without tipping over.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's the faring bug that's causing the payload to catch the wind. Some more fins at the bottom should help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Do these guys not have an emergency destruct? Or do they like dropping missiles on their heads, you know, recreationally

[–] seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz 13 points 4 months ago

Yea, it almost looked like the FTS attempted to activate, but failed to destroy the missile.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

While this is just a test so I don't know if it'd be the same, actual nuclear ICBMs have absolutely no remote cancel or detonation options at all.

Introducing them would introduce the possibility of your enemy hacking them and detonating them to protect themselves, so they're completely out of human control once launched.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't aware that Elon Musk was a consultant for the Russian Armed Forces.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Then you haven't been paying attention

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

4th October 1957: Launches first satellite into orbit.

19th August 1960: Launches first animals into orbit.

12th April 1961: Launches first human into orbit.

Some time passes.

Now: Whatever the fuck this was.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 4 months ago

That patch of grass 15 m from the launch site really had it coming.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Mouahaha it really warms my heart every time the kremlin tries to sabre rattle and everything just go haywire 😁

[–] notabot@piefed.social 17 points 4 months ago

Neit, was not failure, was demonstration of missile extreme manouvering capability. Fligh ended in big bang, so was great success comrade!

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Anyone speak Russian? Why do they constantly sound like they're saying "yeah boy" I'm sure they're not saying it just it sounds very similar

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nothing to see here - Is highly successful test of suicide missle!

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why are we afraid of a failed state with the GDP of Florida?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 6 points 4 months ago

because they have men willing to throw themselves at a drone, the west can barely keep up recruitment for any position in its defence forces

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

i can't believe that the West hasn't conquered Russia during this shitshow. unbelievable.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 25 points 4 months ago (13 children)

"The West" has no desire to conquer Russia. That is a lie that Russians tell to justify their aggression.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

'The west' is barely holding itself together right now; conquering another nation, particularly one the size of Russia, isn't exactly in the cards at the moment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Where's the kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom!

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 10 points 4 months ago

Starts about 0:42. Filmers are far away.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I've been saying this since before the Ukrain War, all bark no bite. Everything has a shelf life, and without maintenance that time period is even shorter. I can't image how well the technical components can hold up. Much less you account for things like spiders or rats dying over specific traces on the circuit board, shorting it out as soon as you apply power.

This goes for every nation that built a shit ton of weapons just to store them somewhere while the infrastructure decays. Is the infrastructure really there for a nuclear response, or is it all a game of chicken?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

How about spending less time saber rattling and more time fixing your 3rd world shithole of country of cowards.

[–] ODGreen@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago

Elon Musk likes to praise Putin and in return, Putin fired a missile SpaceX style.

i mean that's what happens when fairings are replaced with wood

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

Looks successful to me.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Oh great. Now the guy with a massive nuclear arsenal has something to prove.

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

If the fire end starts pointing towards space, you are having a bad problem and will not be going to space today

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί