A bit of tangent, but I've always hated the framing of "small/less government" vs "big/more government". As if "amount of government" is what determines the system it uses or whose interests it serves.
Chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
That's because it's truly meaningless, a phrase in a long list of trite talking points trotted out by our ruling class to justify shitty policy and the entire political & economic system.
a bigger structure has more opportunity for graft and embezzlement but it's a very weak heuristic.
"drive landlords to dump properties" dump them to who, you dumbass
Tenant unions. Hope they drive a hard bargain. 
your real estate holdings or your life

It makes sense that you would land at liberal accelerationism if you truly completely believe anticommunist propaganda while also being a true believing liberal. Show people the failure of socialism and they will see for themselves and come crawling back!
Completely lost in the sauce.
Cry more, whoever the fuck you are.
"most contrarian" more like "most incoherent"
he describes how NYC has $2 trillion in student loan debt and that the current system has failed them
what's that current system? oh? capitalism? it's a failure huh? weird how you're warning against the "failures of socialism" then, fuckass
Even accepting his premise... US politics isn't exactly known for learning from failure and trying something new.
Sorry I can't read loserese