this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
696 points (97.8% liked)

me_irl

6904 readers
368 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rimu@piefed.social 45 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Realistically tho....

Randomly choose a player to be born rich, they start with $5000 and all the railways. Everyone else starts with $20. Only the rich person gets $200 for passing go.

Then play.

It'll be pretty boring and you know how it will end.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, that's the intended lesson of regular monopoly as well.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The intended lesson of the "Capitalist" version of the original "Landlord's Game" game.

But the game was repeatedly stolen, manipulated, and repurposed as a marketing gimmick over the subsequent 120 years since its invention. The current iteration of the game is intended to teach kids that the market rewards the savviest and most cut-throat deal makers. There is no "Socialist" co-operative version of the game, either. In the modern era, it is easier to imagine an end to the world than an end to capitalism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

It’ll be pretty boring and you know how it will end.

Unless the other players learn to unionize.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Have the other players start with $100 in student debt, pay $10 back every time you pass start.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Not even close. Make them start with 60k in debt, they need to pay 6k back every turn, and there is 5% interest on the debt. The debt is paid first and cannot be removed with bankruptcy Also, after 10 turns, if they own no properties, but have made the minimum payment each time, there is a 3% chance that the debt is forgiven. At the end of 20 turns, if they have made all the minimum payments, and they own no properties, flip 9 coins. If all of them are heads, then the debt is forgiven.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ooo I like that one.

Whenever I play monopoly I try go as far off piste as possible. Form a union, write IOUs, set up an alternative currency, offer structured finance deals, run a private stock market, derivatives on future rent payments. Or just outright gambling. No one ever takes me up on these offers, they all think I'm trying to pull a fast one on them. They're not wrong.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

Ohhh I might try and form a workers cooperative next time I am forced to play monopoly

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Start offering payday loans so they can get their $200 early

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To win you have to kill as many industries as possible

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can't afford anything?

Lose your turn. Go straight to Jail.

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You used poverty! It's super effective!

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago

Incorrect.
The only winning move is to guillotine the top, what, 10% of the world's money hoarders. And then start again with everyone knowing that if they hoard wealth in such a manner they'll head to the chopping block.

Hell it'll probably work, but it may not, however I think it's worth a shot. Start with musky boy and tRUMP.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The point he's trying to make is the actual point of Monopoly.

[–] BossDj@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

More like despite being satire, monopoly is still more generous than actual capitalism

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Where is Go, I'd like to pass it.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Too much avocado toast and Starbucks.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Man I never had avocado toast until one time I went to my parents, haven't had it outside that. As a 36 year old who taught my mother how to process? (Cut in half, stab the pit with the knife turn and slice as wanted) I feel my mother will forever think I eat them all the time. I've consumed maybe ~25-30 in my 36 years... That should be roughly $30 U.S. for my life. The fact that they are more than .60 cents is ridiculous now.

Sidenote: lifetime Starbucks expenditures, less than $25

[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 21 points 5 days ago

you must have like 14 houses by now

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In the 70s boomers ate avocado with fish or something. So it's not like avocado is an exclusively millennial discovery.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

True, but toast was invented in 2003. Shortly thereafter a millennial added avocado and the rest is history.

Fun fact, “toast” is named after a kitchen appliance called a “toaster”, which was originally designed to warm up pop tarts. Legend has it a homemaker was storing some bread slices in the poptart slots of her toaster to keep the cat from licking them. The lever was accidentally engaged and the bread emerged from the toaster golden brown and crunchy. She tried a bite and was surprised to find it was not just edible but actually delicious!

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Too complex. Better and simpler ruleset is that everyone else gets a 50 turn headstart.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

FIVE WAYS MILLENNIALS ARE KILLING MONOPOLY... Number 3 will shock you!

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago

If millennials wanted to buy a house, they should have bought one 40 years before they were born. Simple, no?

Every property is already purchased with a full hotel stack across the board

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago

But at least we get trophies?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

If that's the goal, does that mean we're winning?

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Mortal Kombat made you violent

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

All the properties are your parents basement.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

It exists. It's pretty much this, but with worse writing and gameplay.

[–] Taiatari@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 days ago
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I think he meant to say Gen Z monopoly?

Over half of us have a home:

The story is similar for millennials: 54.9% of millennials owned their home last year, essentially

https://www.redfin.com/news/homeownership-rate-by-generation-2024/

Same in Australia

Over half (55 per cent) of Millennials, 25–39 year olds, are homeowners compared with 62 per cent of Generation X and two thirds (66 per cent) of Baby Boomers when they were the same age.

https://www.abs.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/owning-home-has-decreased-over-successive-generations

edit: just realised this tweet is from 2018

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

the significant part is millennials are now in their 40s roughly. That's much later than the last few generations.

i don't deny its worse for gen z, we can still complain it got worse while its getting worse still.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 4 days ago

The fact that of people in their 30s and 40s only half own their home is pretty bad, so... yeah.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Activate piss mode.