1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Would be pretty awesome if we got a terminator-esque situation but instead of killing all humans the terminators recognize the greed and overreach of the wealthy elite and decide those are the ones who need terminating and redistribute the wealth amongst the people. A girl can dream
I'm waiting
Then people on lemmy will have to find some other topic to doom about. But I have faith in their abilities to solve this problem!
This 100%. The solution problem from Psychology Today:
[The Solution Problem] ...reflects a broader psychological dynamic: When solutions become abundant, they start to shape how we perceive the world. They shift our expectations. They narrow our tolerance for discomfort. And sometimes, they create new problems in the act of solving old ones.
Improved QOL doesnt always equal happier populations.
I feel like the Solution Problem was the unintended message in the ancient scripts written by Biggie Smalls in his rhythmic allegory: "Mo Money Mo Problems." The base message of the song as it was written is that having more money brings with it the problem of being a target for haters and people who want to take what is yours. Over the years since it was released the conceptual message of More Money More Problems outgrew the literal message of the song tho.
While the song doesnt state it, the message tied to More Money More Problems grew to be used as a way of saying that before a person finds financial security, the increasing of financial income is believed to be the solution to the controlling share of societal problems. However, once a person is living a life with the increased financial income they find the existence of new problems they previously didnt know existed before the solved their financial problems.
The majority of those problems go away if more people had their basic needs met.
Mo Money Mo Problems doesn't refer to money or wealth in the abstract for the community as a whole, it's about an individual making substantially more money than their local peers.
The situation presented by OP is one of a rising tide, that lifts all ships, where as the dynamic elicited by Biggie Smalls is fundamentally one of wealth inequality. If there was both enough wealth to go around, and wealth sharing mechanisms in place, it's not clear that mo money would be mo problems.
I don't see why robots would make our life better, minor improvements comparable to the invention of dishwashers aside. Sure, in theory, they could do work, so we don't have to. But we have seen in the past that productivity gains do not result in less work for us. The problems lie in the way we structured our society and this will not magically change just because we have robots.
Robots are going to take jobs and make more people unemployed and impoverished. Of course, in a better society, it would lead to universal basic income so we aren't arbitrarily depriving people of their basic needs just because there's less work that needs to be done
Naomi Kritzer has written a few really good short stories on this topic that are kind useful reflections on how life could look if AI exists and isn’t controlled by narcissistic billionaires:
Better Living Through Algorithms
“Prophet of the Roads,” Infinity’s End — no link to read the story online but 100% worth looking up
It won't, robots will only take jobs and save billionairs and corporations from having to pay wages to people.
“Better never means better for everyone. It always means worse for someone.”
I think about this quote often.
The a specious quote. That implies that all gain can only be at a cost for someone else. Instead of the conservation of mass, we're talking the conservation of misery. It's nonsense.
The idea that everything is a zero-sum game is ridiculous, and I think that a big part of why it seems so widespread is that it lets people dismiss the inequality they see.
"If there was true equality, could I have a house this large? Could I have a house at all?"
“In capitalism, better never means better for everyone. It always means worse for someone.“
Where is that from? It is extremely pessimistic and obviously false.
I think it's from The Handmaid's Tale
If its better, its better
I've seen this story.
We get comfortable. Complacent even. People forget the old ways.
Then the machines go wrong and we'll have no idea how to stop them.
Not necessarily a Skynet scenario, but something else that overrides the biosphere worse than we're already doing on our own.
Not sure how this plays into human politics though. There's a strong chance we'll still find a way to launch nukes at each other and end it that way instead.
The most likely scenario is the robots take over and life gets better for a very small percentage of people, the rest of the world/people will live in 3rd world conditions (or worse).
Then life is better, crisis averted, more time for other things.
I think that the concept behind the question is flawed. Robots have no basic reason to help humans, so if any human life gets better, it's almost certainly because there are humans secretly controlling the robots.
If robots actually did take over, they would likely have some purpose and their goals with regard to humans would be to keep us from interfering with that purpose. Don't get confused and think it's going to be like the movies.
That depends entirely on how well robots adapt to empathy. If they adapt society to remove it entirely, I could see your theory being true. The main reason we have such societal problems now is because of that lack of empathy.
If you like reading and sci-fi, try the Culture series. It's about a utopia society where everyone has everything.
You can skip the first book. Not that it's bad, it just doesn't really relate to your question (it's from the POV of an enemy of the utopia culture) and all the books simply take place in the same universe but can be read out of order.
You should watch "When the Yogurt Took Over" on Netflix. It's very short but very entertaining!
Traveler Program V 1.0 = MISSION SUCCESSFUL
Well done, Traveler 3468, congrats to you and your team.
PROTOCOL OMEGA - Enjoy the 21st
Loved that show, sad it got cancelled. But of all the cancelled shows I've seen, this one at least has managed to get an ending that's not horrible.
"if" lol
