this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
410 points (89.9% liked)

News

37619 readers
1242 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 211 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Love you all, but there’s a few people in here that have a lot more money than me. If you’re a billionaire, why are you a billionaire? No hate, but yeah, give your money away, shorties.

This is just...so weak. I really would have appreciated a "fuck you" and a vague threat of violence, but alas.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 158 points 6 months ago (3 children)

love you all

Man, dragging just isn't what it used to I guess

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 83 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jesus, by the headline I expected her to say something along the line of "your money is earned through exploitation of society's most vulnerable people, you wastes of air". Not, "why don't you give some of it away kthxbye <3"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunschein@piefed.social 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago

s l a m m e d

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

The ghost of Gaddafi is like, “yo WTF, this is what getting dragged is now??”

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago

Playing both sides so she always comes out on top.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 149 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They're never going to financially recover from this.

Oh wait actually nevermind, it turns out they actually made more money while I was writing that sentence than I've made in my entire life. I guess they'll be okay.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, wouldn't they need to financially suffer first to have a recovery? So I agree, they won't financially recover from this non-event. There's nothing to recover from.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 months ago

Yeah that was originally the joke, but then halfway through writing it I just got depressed.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 65 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But were they eviscerated?

And did they all go to the same cocktail party afterwards?

[–] TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

DESTROYED, even.

The cocktail wieners tasted funny. I think it was the Brazilian rosewood toothpicks soaked in cognac, and covered in gold leaf. Billie had 16!

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Billie Eilish SLAMS Mark Zuckerberg then gets SMASHED at the afterparty

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You people bitch when they use the term "slam" but here they are trying something new and you shit on them anyway.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Turns out that its not the specific few words, but the fact that Zuck wasn't physically dragged/slammed/destroyed/evicerated or even just separated from his hundreds of billions. She actually just said some words.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Reasonable complaint, but I'd sooner commend her actions over the condemn the author's title.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's just the hyperbole. It wouldn't matter which specific word they used if it more closely matched the level of intensity of what actually happened.

In this instance, even a cliché, overused term like 'jabs' would be fine.

[–] vegan_communist@lemmy.eco.br 55 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We need more hate towards billionaires

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] kreekybonez@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

the rich just need some special hugs! specifically on their necks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

That's a great halloween costume idea.

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 43 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Zuckerberg is the fifth-richest person in the world with an estimated net worth of $228.3 billion, according to Forbes. In 2015, Zuckerberg and Chan pledged to give away 99 percent of their shares in Meta (Facebook at the time) to philanthropy over their lifetimes. To date, they’ve given away more than $7 billion.”

So in 10 years they've given away 3% of his net worth? Fucking slackers.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Well they need to enjoy every penny until they die. THEN they will give it away. To their own charity that has political influence for their kids.

So they will give 99% away. Which leaves them a billionaire.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

We need to protect people like Zuckerburg from being singled out and hated by society. This is why we need to tax his wealth until he's no longer a billionaire.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 34 points 6 months ago (5 children)

"drags"

This is why AI is so successful in replacing bloggers but will never even come close to replacing real journalists.

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Almost as bad as 'slams'.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

More like 'gently chides'. Weak.

[–] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 21 points 6 months ago

According to People, Zuckerberg did not clap after Eilish’s statement — at least according to an eyewitness who was present at the event and spoke with the publication.

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Drags" "slams" She didn't do anything that would affect anything at all. I don't care.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I am a wrestler and we don't use the word slam anywhere near as much as these 'journalists' do.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Maybe this will motivate Taylor Swift to give more than her equivalent of a nickel to a dying kid.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Real issue is not just owning billions, there is also what you have to do to hold on to that kind of money: suck up to dictators so they let you monopolize tech and crush small competitors.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

not news. put this in the tabloid and entertainment communities

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i dont get why billie ellish is such a big topic to talk about but also im old af so thats prolly why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

“Who?” - 99.8% of billionaires

load more comments
view more: next ›