this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)
El Chisme
518 readers
1 users here now
Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.
Rules:
Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.
Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 4: No sectarianism.
Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
god damn it 
I wonder what specific uses Kojima is thinking of.
the lalilulelo
Probably using agents and whatnot to speed up programming and spending less time copying from stack overflow. He might be able to make it work, but I'm skeptical.
I’m pretty optimistic about it. AI is a tool that is a terrible replacement for human creativity, however, it’s very useful for organization and programming. I think people hear ‘AI’ and immediately worry that it’ll become a crutch or abused in some way… for pretty obvious reasons. But I highly doubt we’ll ever see Kojima’s sense of creativity replaced by a machine.
I'd be wary about coding anything public-facing though. I have yet to see an AI that codes with security in mind.
Hell, how does it do at performance optimization? Don't have to worry about security when you've bricked all the low-end/unusual machines.
The idea is to treat the AI like a junior developer and review its work, not to vibe code your auth system
I've been a bit of a stick in the mud when it comes to using AI but what you said seems fairly accurate. It is so easy to detect when anything is written mostly or entirely by AI because it does completely lack creativity. But it is easier to just use an agent to implement standard boilerplate code that a qualified human will review than copying and pasting from stack overflow. Or to quickly summarize an email chain. Or even to come up with a quick software prototype if you are confident that you will not be forced to make whatever code it comes up with actually work well.
When you realize your goat is washed 💔
~~ahead of who, poor people?~~ oh, I guess other game developers. who cares
It is genuinely great for programming, because there's so much code and so much documentation to pull from, and coding is the kind of task that benefits from being done rigidly and predictably. Hopefully that's what he means, since even the best models are still really bad at creative tasks and not likely to get much better.
i wish i liked any of his games but i don't. i'm still disappointed tho cause i know so many people do
He would.