this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
292 points (99.0% liked)

News

36912 readers
2440 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 229 points 6 months ago (7 children)

He added about Kirk, “He’s been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. And I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that is the environment we are in. You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place. And that’s the unfortunate environment we are in.”

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 159 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The media is clearly just corrupt and nothing but a propaganda piece if him saying that is sack worthy. That’s just a well informed statement

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 107 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It's well informed while being the mildest take imaginable. Doesn't condone violence, doesn't do a victory lap, just ever so gently connects one dot to another.

I would sack someone for using the phrase 'sort of' that often though.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 months ago

Yeah it was all a very mild and true take. I do agree about the over use of “sort of” as well. Yikes, I realize now it’s really a lot after you pointed that out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 98 points 6 months ago (1 children)

THAT getting him fired so immediately is all the proof anyone should ever need to never trust commentators from MSNBC again.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Never use any nbc. They may position themselves as Democrats, but they are the Democrats that have led us to nominate three awful presidential candidates that have allowed this Republican party to achieve what might now be absolute power soon. They've made no secret of their plans to kill the Republican all but name and we still refused to nominate candidates that could save the Republic and stop them.

This media is the enemy and has been, even if somewhat separate from the enemy controlling the federal government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 months ago

Hilarious that someone putting the truth out there gets canned.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago

It's incredible that the fellow got fired over such a truthful and insightful comment.

I was in the US in my late teens, and one thing I realized almost straight away was how shallow American polemics about any socio-political topics were. American "free speech" polemics (among all other polemics) to me seemed like an attempt to act out and engage in theatrics that had nothing to do with the concept of free speech (which is actually an extremely complicated and nuanced topics).

There is a silver lining to this, I think at least some people (on the margin) might stop treating local polemics as undeniable truth.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 12 points 6 months ago

MSNBC are just deferring to The Idiot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 178 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He didn't say anything untrue. Charlie Kirk himself said that gun violence is an acceptable consequence of maintaining everyone's 2nd amendment rights. This is the environment he advocated for. This is what killed him.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 59 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We live in a society where truth doesn't mean a damn thing anymore. You know they will spin this in such a way that they actually gain from it, be it by limiting your rights further or by lying to impressionable idiots who then vote for them.

Regardless, objective truth as a marker has lost all its relevance somewhere after 2016.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

No we live in a society where the truth is actively suppressed because wealthy people fear the population realizing they are badly losing a class war due to being tricked into a culture war. Kirk was a culture warrior. Any sort of consensus amongst the various factions is very bad for the owner class, and what he said might lead to an awakening, a la Luigi. What Dowd said risks that awakening.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 163 points 6 months ago (3 children)

“He’s been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. And I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that is the environment we are in. You can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place. And that’s the unfortunate environment we are in.”

Was he wrong?

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

No but he wasn't let go because of that remark.

He was let go for this

“We don’t know if this was a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration. So we have no idea about this.”

That's what kicked of the uproar by snowflake Republicans and their Pearl clutching.

[–] JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean it's an absolutely ridiculous thing to say. He should get flack for how patentedly stupid that comment was. But probably not fired.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

I completely agree. But I'm not a billionaire running a cable "news" outlet that can't let a single dollar go away.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Jesus christ that man is a great comedian.

[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 19 points 6 months ago

Corporate media has always been complicit.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 116 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck. He was asked about the environment we're in and he said he always believed that hateful thoughts lead to hate words which lead to hateful actions. So we can't be surprised that when we have hate thought and hateful words that we see hateful actions.

How did he condone political violence?!? He just answered the fucking question!

[–] Kalothar@piefed.social 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I want you to know they can’t see that, the supporters of Kirk and his kind. They see some weird golden reality where a father and man of God was assassinated by the left.

To them he was a Guardian of society and tradition, giving his time up to connect with the youth in honest discussion.

They for whatever reason cannot see it as him being hateful, to them their golden boy died. Or at least that’s what they will pretend to believe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _chris@lemmy.world 80 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We really gotta stop appeasing the fascists.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the fascists own the media.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 6 months ago

The other factions of fascists own this media, the repub partisan fascists are taking over the long game of big biz to kill the republic in all but name.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 61 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He was right and lost his job over it

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Not unusual in this timeline. Check the news about the head of the Department of Labor Statistics.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 58 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Let us all come together and condemn violence of any kind.

Oh, get fucked dude.

Saying this as groups are forcibly rounded up by masked police, and a police state is being created in DC, among other increasing intolerance and hate.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean clearly, multiple right wing commentators and leaders that are literally calling for the murder of anyone on the left is not a problem at all.

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I actually developed a bit of respect for Chuckles after this event. He died for his beliefs. Wish more Republicans would.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 45 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Proof the media is corrupt and owned by the evil empire

[–] hector@lemmy.today 10 points 6 months ago

The large media companies are owned by broad commercial interests and indeed the enemy of working people however they try to position themselves, but the other Factor at play here is the right is trying to subordinate them further and accuses them of bias at every opportunity and they cave to the pressure. Not the least as they can step on their other myriad commercial interests for not caving as we saw with Colbert recently.

Caving to the pressure it will only make it worse though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wronful dismissal lawsuit bud; make them regret their move!

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 months ago

You're of course right, but he already folded and apologized before they fired him.

Unless he can PROVE (what we all know) that the apology was a coerced lie, he probably doesn't have a case, sadly.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (4 children)

That's not how free speech works there.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 20 points 6 months ago

Meanwhile, every instance of something horrifying happening to a Democrat is featured on Fox News with Tucker Carlson squinting angrily into the camera saying it was all their fault, and he hopes it happens again.

I mean it is valuable, I guess, to maintain some standards of non violence even when "they" are not. I'm just saying the double standard is relevant.

Political analyst Matthew Dowd on MSNBC wonders whether the Charlie Kirk shooting may have been “a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration.”

Well... holy shit man. You can't say that on TV, even about a bad person.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 16 points 6 months ago

We don’t know if this was a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration.

I’m cracking up

[–] masta_chief@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 months ago

Streisand effect time? Gonna follow this person now.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Meanwhile every right-wing commentator on every right wing media outlet is calling for blood and wants to murder and incarcerate anyone just to the left of the Kaiser.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Fuck all network news. They're all billionaires bullshit.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

The comment about the supporter shooting the gun in celebration was slightly inappropriate. Everything else is spot on.

load more comments
view more: next ›