Poland Calls To Activate NATO Article 4 https://www.newsweek.com/nato-article-4-poland-russia-drones-airspace-2127438
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
This is funny to me because the purpose of NATO is to strengthen the American industrial military complex, and the alliance is dangerously close to falling apart because there's little chance that NATO backs up Poland
So jealous of the French
Feels like we're in a bit of a Happening period the last few days. Not quite decades in weeks, but months in days maybe.
A thread with images of all the drone and missile debris found in Poland, Xcancel
Looks like Russian Gerbera drones/decoys, and the remains of AIM-120 air to air missiles that were used to shoot some of them down.
Big question is how did Gerbera drones get into Poland. Launched from Belarus possibly? Belarus is saying that these drones went off course due to electronic warfare, and that they also shot some down and informed Poland.
A $10,000 drone taken out by a $384,000 missile.
It's probably all they had on hand at the time for a quick response, F-35s were shooting down the drones, very much overkill. A much cheaper solution likely available to European NATO members for fighter jets would be using old model AIM-9L/M Sidewinder missiles, that's what Ukraine uses on F-16s to shoot down these one way attack drones. An F-16 can fit 6 of these missiles, with 2-3 external fuel tanks for loiter time. Even cheaper would be laser guided rockets, which is what the US uses. A single F-16 or F-15 can be fitted with 42 APKWS laser guided rockets, in addition to more conventional air to air missiles. But European NATO members likely do not have this available currently.
What was the point of flying through Polish airspace?
Putin got tired of Nothing Happening
To show that NATO is toothless.
The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi, provides details on the agreement reached with Iran yesterday.
In short, according to Grossi, a framework deal that, if followed, should open up the way for the inspection of all nuclear facilities in Iran. Iran will also be required to report on all the attacked nuclear facilities, including the nuclear material (enriched uranium) present at these facilities. In obligation with the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. This is if the agreement is actually implemented.
Looks like things are kicking off in France
Roads blocked, security forces scrambled
Seems like the link isn't pointing to what you mention
fixed now?
Yup, ty!
https://www.newsweek.com/nato-article-4-poland-russia-drones-airspace-2127438
Poland asks NATO to invoke article 4
Guess they're gonna learn the hard way that NATO is for protecting the imperial core, not the periphery lapdogs.
The speed they did this without any length of investigation of a false flag knowing Ukkkraine tried this in the past is sus.
This is literally just that one Monty Python skit:
And you can bet just as little will come of it. They'll just sit around and have their little circlejerk condemning Russia and beating their chests about how united they are and so on.
First time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine that article 4 has been invoked (it was last invoked at the start of the war by eastern European member states), and the 8th time in NATO history of my memory is correct.
The text of article 4 is quite short:
The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.
So just consultation in NATO. My guess is they want to decide if further actions (defensive measures) should be taken, and what those may be. For example Turkey has invoked Article 4 for additional defensive measures (such as the deployment of air defence) or deterrence exercises in the past, or to inform NATO of it's actions in response to military activities in Syria. At most I think, NATO may agree to deploy additional C-UAS (counter unmanned aerial systems) and air patrols more specialised to shoot down UAS to Poland. Outside of NATO, such air patrols were deployed by the United States to Jordan recently, and ended up shooting down Iranian one way attack drones headed towards Israel. I think that currently, the United States is the only nation capable of providing such specialised air patrols in NATO. European NATO members are capable of it, but it would require the purchase of laser guided rockets and certifying it on their aircraft. Or they may agree to keep the current posture and say a bunch of word salad.
Trump allegedly demanding that the EU slap up to 100% tariffs on India and China, according to Reuters.
The EU diplomat said the U.S. had indicated it was willing to impose similar tariffs if the European Union heeded the U.S. request.
So is this where Trump demands that the EU do an economic kamikaze attack and has them take blame if they refuse? Saying that they'll do it too, but the EU has to go first, is kinda suspicious.
Trump pushing EU to slap 100% tariffs on China, India be like:
has expressed growing frustration at the difficulty of reaching a peace deal amid Russia’s escalating attacks on Ukrainian cities.
I feel like I've heard this phrase be repeated in basically every article of the war at every given point of the reporting.
Like, what are they supposed to do? Just attack once and then back off? Never actually try to gain any ground?
Russia violating polish airspace is actually kinda funny. The Europeans have nothing left to give, and they're going to try and possibly fail to rearm no matter what happens. If the Russians violated Polish airspace weekly it would either be Gerans very economically intercepting and destroying European missile stocks, or Europe cringing as they can do nothing to stop the drone raids through their territory. It's 2025. Are we going to continue to believe Europeans hold international law sacred? Fuck with them a bit. Outrage the impotent, depraved ghouls.
everything is mostly over now, the line between protesters and mob were blurred in the end hours when governmental building were targeted like supreme courts, National banks, etc
The rage had been specifically against the elite and their properties during the day so the sudden shift in target at the end was very suspicious. It was immediately condemned by the people with several conspiracies floating around about who was behind the attack. felt like mob were going after court, custom office, etc and destroying documents and other evidence deliberately. Currently the Maoist are being blamed for the destruction since they suffered the least damage. Some of it might be even true, just because they called themselves 'Maoist' doesn't mean they are in principle.
Luckily the chaos didn't last long. Nepal army was deployed at 10 pm and order was quickly restored. The suspicion of some foreign power suddenly hijacking the entire thing is entirety valid but don't think thats the case. The army patrolling the street might make it seem scary but they are just providing support. Their arrival made it so that people can sleep in peace.
I mean, incredibly militant communist in-fighting is kind of the Maoist trademark, no?
So, like, about this Nepal shit, is the ban on social media thing because the platforms aren't following whatever law the government passed, like in brazil a few months ago?
If so can I get a feel of how many people here agree that, when the motive for a protest is seriously just wanting to go back on facebook, then fuck this whole movement?
Literally these kids, myself included, could and should go without this shit
Both, the platforms were banned because they didn't comply with the law, and cause WhatsApp was the main method of communication for a majority of the country its banning led to real impacts of people's ability to work etc
But yeah I agree, there probably was some treat withdrawal animating atleast a few people
So, like, about this Nepal shit, is the ban on social media thing because the platforms aren't following whatever law the government passed, like in brazil a few months ago?
something like that but the ban was just a part of series of event that made Nepal explode.
then fuck this whole movement?
well kind of, i dont know how to go about the movement. Its good in part where the ossified political establishment is purged, and bad because there was no real movement or purpose other that removing the political establishment. This not a revolutionary movement that should be cheered on or a color revolution to be condemned. People were angry, they have been angry and all the photo and videos of dead children made it so that no one came in their defense.
Literally these kids, myself included, could and should go without this shit
yeah they should, and if it was only about social media ban then people will just use VPNs until things got sorted out. They will be annoyed but not ready to die for it.
This site literally cried about Biden banning TikTok lol.
These reformist snakes really are something else:
https://twitter.com/fresh_sadegh/status/1965494485703594035
“Not providing details” is in fear of domestic backlash inside Iran and the threats of Iranian lawmakers to impeach Araghchi.
And guess what? The cherry on top of Iran-IAEA deal is: the parliament is closed until September 28.
First, as always, this is not the "reformist snakes". You might recall that every single Iranian administration does shit like this and the entire political class, reformist or not, is incapable of not reflexively turning to the west.
Second, I stand by the "what the fuck else are they supposed to do?" take. You proceed with these negotiations because the alternative is UN sanctions. The Iranian economy absolutely cannot afford that right now, and the continuity of the Islamic Republic depends on meeting the material needs of its people. Plus, China follows UN sanctions (weak), so if Iran is finally deciding they actually want to buy Chinese weapons they need to do this. Keep in mind it was the non "reformist snake" faction that refused for years to build the military connections with China it needed because of their anticommunism.
Norwegian parliamentary election result rundown (99% votes counted): Red-green socdem-led block keeps majority with 88 out of 169 seats, big shakeups within both blocks.
Red-green block:
- Labour party: 28% (+1,8), 53 seats (+5)
- Socialist left party: 5,6% (-2,2), 9 seats (-4)
- Centre party: 5,6% (-7,9), 9 seats (-19)
- Red party: 5,3 (+0,6), 9 seats (+1)
- Green party 4,7 (+0,8), 8 seats (+5)
Bourgeois block:
- Progress party: 23,9% (+12,2), 47 seats (+26)
- Conservative party: 14,6% (-5,7), 24 seats (-12)
- Christian democrats: 4,2% (+0,4), 7 seats (+4)
- Liberal party: 3,7% (-0,9), 3 seats (-5)
Actually existing socialism survives another day in Scandinavia
I really doubt anything will come from gulf States discomfort from Qatar strike. I don't remember his name but an Iranian official made a very good comment about this "do not believe anti semitic lies, gulf states have more lobby power than israhell ever did. All the" Jewish lobby" talk is to deflect blame away from the fact that gulf states want this". All of this was done with the consent of the gulf states
I really hate to say this but the Gulf States and other Pissreal neighbours might be relieved for the "Palestinian Problem" to finally just go away so they can get on to business as usual.
Edit: While also avoiding Pissreal's very vocal "Great Israel" project, that they would all be affected by. To their own peril.
They're happy to throw Syria and Yemen under the bus if that makes them a quick buck.
One of our main lines of funding has been cut, and if we don’t act now, MintPress could be forced to shut down.
Why doesn't Russia, Iran and China not fund alt media outlets? They're gonna claim you are no matter what, so you may as well do it
Russia does some of it, but they pick the most hare-brained cranks they can find for the most part instead of investing in reliable spokespeople.
Based on what I wildly speculate are Russian assets, you've got the those ranging from least offensive (Danny Haiphong, Alexander Mercouris) to most egregious and cranked up (Haz, Jackson Hinkle, Armchair Warlord, etc etc). Why can't they just invest in a basic journalists like Iran does with various resistance outlets? Why the twitter pundits?
Why can't they just invest in a basic journalists like Iran does with various resistance outlets?
They do. They have plenty of professional journalists working for RT, Sputnik and other outlets. There is no evidence whatsoever that any of the people you mentioned are "Russian assets". Maybe entertain the possibility that Russia has nothing to do with them and they are just randos on the Internet doing their thing.
Because realistically, the Russian government has nothing to gain from accurately informing people in the west. They have no interest or hope that if they are better informed they will end imperialist violence. It's more useful for them to have cranks push all kinds of weird positions and destabilize political discourse which makes western leadership less resolute.