172
submitted 8 months ago by spaceghoti@lemmy.one to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 62 points 8 months ago

I love eating popcorn and watching from a distance as much as the next person, but I am so full of popcorn at this point.

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 31 points 8 months ago

Plus, the show is long, long overdue to be not only over but actually cancelled and never run again. it’s actually time to get back to fucking work and not have these shitheads carry on with their awful routines and slapstick.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

That's the point of the circus. To keep from doing work.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Have you seen the “Thriller” music video where MJ is grinning and eating popcorn in the movie theater at the beginning? That’s the face I think we all have.

https://64.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyvrkqzZnl1rn95k2o1_500.gifv

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

I'm so glad someone in the GOP called out the Jewish space lasers thing! How did someone so VOCALLY CRAZY get elected, it makes me very sad.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 26 points 8 months ago

Marge "jewish space laser" Greene trying to censure someone for incomplete support of Isreal. What a fucking laugh.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

Okay but why is the thumbnail a picture of a crazed baboon

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Because that's what they elected

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

It can be pretty entertaining watching a snake eat it’s own tail.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The Republicans are eating themselves. The two party system is no more! Now it's a one party system!

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

Or, if we’re lucky, a third party will arise, giving legitimacy to viewpoints beyond just democrat or republican. This could potentially lead to more parties, and perhaps even a better way of voting for candidates. Maybe even better representation?

I can dream, can’t I? I mean, I certainly don’t want the fascists to win, and more parties (and people) voting against them could be a good thing. I also understand that it could be a very, very bad thing.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Read history. For most of the 20th Century there were liberal Republicans and conservative Dems. Crossing the aisle wasn't seen as treason, and cooperation was the norm. Even Reagan talked about a 'Big Tent' with plenty of opposing views.

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

I’m well aware. I’m also aware that other countries have much better representation due to having a variety of parties and not just one or two.

Most issues are far from black and white. We should stop pretending they are, and the system we live under should reflect it.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 6 points 8 months ago

Steve Bannon calls it the uniparty, implicitly arguing for real fascists

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

and accused Roy of “hating Trump.”

Yeah and? Most people hate him.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

What's the matter Colonel Sanders, chicken? 🍗

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I'm surrounded by assholes!

At least that part is correct in this context

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


House Republicans had a chaotic October — ousting Kevin McCarthy as Speaker, fighting bitterly about it for weeks, and then electing Mike Johnson to replace him, seemingly because no know knew him well enough to hate him.

The party is now at odds over Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat whom Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene wants to censure for participating in a Gaza ceasefire protest at the Capitol last month.

Greene absurdly called the nonviolent demonstration an “insurrection,” both at the time and in her proposed censure, which 23 Republicans joined Democrats in voting to table.

Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) — who has been criminally indicted for a wide away of alleged fraud — on Wednesday night survived an expulsion attempt brought by members of his own party.

Santos is a stain on this institution and not fit to serve his constituents in the House of Representatives,” Rep. Anthony D’Esposito (R-N.Y.), who brought the resolution, said on the floor.

The House GOP is paralyzed by petty feuds and clearly has no interest in actually governing, but you wouldn’t know it from listening to Speaker Johnson on Thursday morning.


The original article contains 443 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

lol feck em

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 8 months ago

vaping groping Lauren Boebert

vaping groper?

groping vaper?

One of those has to be less stupid than what marge said.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
172 points (95.7% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2638 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS