this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
723 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9377 readers
2098 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 114 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

in case there are others like me who have to see what it looks like on a Mercator projection map:

[–] x0x7@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

Wow. I can't believe my perspective of the world is that distorted. It makes me want to only look at it in 3D. If we've all mainly looked at Mercator projections our whole lives our sense of where everything is relative to everything else and what direction is completely off.

People complain about the proportional sizing of Mercator but the sense of direction it gives us is completely broken. I think the average person knows it's off and people think there is an error factor to consider that a really straight like might be a little squiggly. But nope. This made me realize the Mercator gives pretty much zero accurate sense of direction if real distance is involved.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The word "can" Is doing some heavy lifting here. I mean, there is a difference between theoretically possible and actually being done.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 53 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Don’t the circumpolar winds essentially prevent this, or at least make it really impractical?

[–] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sorry, can't hear you down here in my submarine

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago (2 children)

DON'T THE CURCUMPOLAR WINDS ESSENTIALLY PREVENT THIS, OR AT LEAST MAKE IT REALLY IMPRACTICAL?

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago
[–] stairjoke@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago

Sailing near the south pole is not advisable, you might die. But thats also true for many other things, so whatever.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No diesel sub is going to have the range to make that trip. And NZ doesn't allow nuclear subs in its waters.

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

nuclear subs are all over the place and could even be in their waters with out them realising

[–] three@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's true I've got all the locations of the nuclear subs right here and this conjecture is totally correct.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Submarines don't sail, they steam.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only place you can't sail is directly into the wind. You can go all the other places eventually but it's a lot of back and forth.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tacking back and forth is kinda the opposite of a straight line though, isn't it?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That southern ocean is brutal tho

[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Especially going the wrong direction!

It'd be less bad on the return trip, but then you're fighting the trade winds and the Canary current instead.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Just rename it as Pacific Ocean and voila, no storm hence the name!

[–] Nanook@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even better, imho, you can sail in a direct line from OG Zeeland (Netherlands) to New Zealand.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Can you, though? You'd have to squeeze through the narrow English Channel first, and that would probably require some turns.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Now all we need is some insane person with a kayak.

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago

I volunteer— not like you go through most dangerous sea passage in the world or anything…

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If it makes you feel better, the line is actually curved along the surface of the earth, you know, if you believe in a spherical earth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There is also a route that can be drawn from Halifax, Nova Scotia on the Canadian east coast on the Atlantic ... head a bit south east and without touching land and only going over the ocean, you can end up on the west coast of British Columbia, in Canada on the Pacific coast.

I used to reference a website that showed that ... but now I can't seem to find it. :(

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Another fun one is to ask someone if they were to take off in an airplane from Miami and fly due south, which South American countries would they fly over?

The answer is none of them. You end up missing the entire continent because you are too far west.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You hit Panama first, but small portions of Ecuador and Peru are west of Miami (80.2 degrees west). The broader point that South America is much farther east than many Americans think is definitely true, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 26 points 1 month ago

Hopefully someone shares this with Geowizard, ultimate straight line challenge.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I got this far on the Wikipedia and gave up:

On a curved surface, the concept of straight lines is replaced by a more general concept of geodesics, curves which are locally straight with respect to the surface. Geodesics on the sphere are great circles, circles whose center coincides with the center of the sphere.

[–] Kobibi@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I went down a rabbit hole about globes and maps recently

Basically, to find the shortest distant between two places on a globe (a 'straight' line), imagine a hoop or circle round the earth that cuts it exactly in half, and rotate it until it passes through both places (still cutting it exactly in half)

That's a great circle.

There are 2d map projections that are built around this, but they only work when one of the locations is at the center of the map. So it could show the shortest distance from, say, London to anywhere with a straight line, but it wouldn't work for a route not including London

In case anyone else finds visual guides to be helpful for this sort of thing, I made a graphic to accompany your words:

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can also build a nearly straight railway going from California through Canada and Alaska all the way to China.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bering_Strait_crossing

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That'd be awesome. That probably wouldn't work because it would take 100 years for California to build their first high speed rail

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago

You can plot a course in a straight line. Unfortunately, weather.

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Straight line? That looks hella curved, innit? Can't fool us with a globe. A flat map, maybe. But not a globe. Despite it being a 2D representation of a globe

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 1 month ago

If it doesn't look right, change the way the data is presented and projected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm no sailing historian, but that's probably how they actually discovered New Zealand.

"Heya mates, how'bout we be goin' straight ahead 'til back'ome we arrrggggh!!"

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 11 points 1 month ago

The Polynesians took the long route.

The European explorers actually took a very similar route, so this seems to be an obvious option for sailors doing island hops in that area.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago


Comms Officer: Sirs, we still have quite a bit of time to change course.

Red: But we're going straight.

Purple: Yeah. Turning's no fun. Why is this happening? Make it not happen.

[–] cosmictrickster@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

One of the few world maps with New Zealand on it.

[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 weeks ago

Only with an icebreaker

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Hum, so it's a straight line, but it's curved, and the compas turns half way.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Y'all, I found the Flat Earther!

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

Don't make fun of flat earthers, their ideology is spreading all over the globe!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Well, yeah..if you want a line that is straight in 3 dimensions then any point on earth at sea level to any other point earth at sea level will require you to go below the surface of the planet.

load more comments
view more: next ›