this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
257 points (97.4% liked)

News

31983 readers
2283 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has also targeted law firms who have filed lawsuits he opposes, while the Federal Communications Commission, led by a Trump appointee, is investigating every major broadcast network except Fox, which owns the pro-Trump Fox News channel. Trump has personally sued news channels over critical coverage and fired the government’s top labour statistician because she published jobs data that he didn’t like.

He has threatened Democrats with prosecution, and demanded that former president Barack Obama be investigated for treason. Trump has done all this as his family has ostensibly earned millions of dollars from his presidency.

None of these things are typical for a democratic leader. So … is Trump a dictator?

“Yes, of course,” said Kim Lane Scheppele, a professor of sociology at Princeton University who spent years researching autocracies including Hungary and Russia. Scheppele said she had been wavering on using the term “dictatorship” until recently, but said: “If I was hesitating before, it’s this mobilization of the national guard and the indication that he plans to overtake resistance by force that now means we’re in it.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Well he's DEFINITELY a felon and rapist.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 16 points 10 hours ago

The moment he threw out due process it became the case. People taken and renditioned to a foreign gulag based only on his command. Due process determine the legal and thus societal truth of the matter and if there is any legal reason to interfere with someones freedoms by government action. Once its out all our freedoms are gone.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

And surprisingly, the GOP is dead silent about the dictator and all his anti-GOP decisions.

I remember when i was a conservative, this shit would not fly. The minute the orange man even mentioned sending out national guard, the forums, facebook, NRA page, EVERYTHING would have blown up if this was 15 years ago.

But since they have a false sense of power now and the people they don't like are being targeted, they are fine with all of it. It really proves that the GOP doesn't have any plans to make the country better, only revenge and enriching the wealthy.

I hope one day the GOP voter base realizes they are being fooled and lied to, but most of them can't open their mind enough to accept it. It took me decades to realize the error in my ways, but many refuse to change.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago

He also says he's smart.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 8 hours ago

"I am not the king" said the ruler of the kingdom.

[–] Thoven 3 points 10 hours ago

Well, if he walks like a duck and talks like a duck...

[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 5 points 11 hours ago

This dude dreams of being Hitler 2; he's certainly acting like he already owns the place.

[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

A Dick Tater maybe.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

Why you even ask? You have to be stupid to think otherwise.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 60 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

He'll keep tippy toeing towards it while everyone just lets him ... then he'll get right up the edge of becoming one and then die an old senile man

Then his replacement, whoever it will be .... will be the Dictator

I'm not worried about Cheeto Mussolini .... I'm worried about who will come next

Nice job America ... we could always count you guys to be idiots.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago

America - Can't be bothered. We got beer, burgers, sports, oh and Faux news.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

wtf are you talking about? He's speed running his destruction of all checks and balances, blatantly expanding presidential powers to do things that were previously unthinkable. There is no tiptoeing to be seen, only large strides with little meaningful pushback.

I'm not worried about whoever takes over next, as the Republican party has been systematically purged of strong leadership by Trump. Maybe some extra slimy Democrat or Republican several years later will be able to capitalize on the damaged system better than Trump has, but immediately after he's gone the GOP is fucked. Against a demoralized base and an energized opposition, someone like Vance will not be able to maintain power.

I really think many people underestimate Trump because recognizing his competence goes against some inherent beliefs they have about intelligence. They don't want to believe that such an uncultured buffoon actually had the best political instincts out of anyone in Washington for the past decade. It's easier to believe he's a puppet who succeeded because of better men than to recognize what his actual political merits are. He deserves to stand next to Hitler or Mao as a person who, despite being an idiot in many respects, had exceptional political talents that allowed them to be a powerful dictator.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think Vance (or anyone really) can maintain the cult of personality required.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Once the military control and election suppression are in place, you don’t need the “charisma” anymore.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You still need a strongman. Vance isn't it.

Bashar al-Assad didn't seem like a dictator to start with.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I just hope, when he dies, it breaks the spell he appears to have on people and they recognize the tyranny that they've been championing for what it is.

Not going to hold my breath.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It won't change anything because immigrants are still here and women still have jobs. The new GOP is all about putting us back in the 30's. They will continue to be angry and support any leader who hates the people they hate.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yeah, I think that will be the case for most of them probably. But I'm hoping there's a number of them that were (for reasons that will forever be beyond my comprehension) drawn in by Trump's behavior and manner of speaking, that will either snap out of it, or just stop paying attention to politics or voting altogether.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah he's the Julius. I fear Augustus.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago

Can we fast forward to Nero and just put the empire out of its misery? Let the Eastern Empire be founded and grow.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

We're getting the circuses but they're not giving us any bread

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 19 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

He's absolutely NOT a dictator. He's absolutely an authoritarian who wants to be a dictator though. But I feel like we hyper-focus on the "totalitarian dictator" too much without acknowledging that there are plenty of ways to achieve dictator-like powers without the title. Putin is technically elected for example. But he wields near absolute control.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Given that like 98% of what has been happening since January 20 is a consequence of unilateral executive orders, I'd have to say that I disagree.

He's literally been dictating what he wants to happen (and then it happens). I'm not sure what else you could call it...

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He’s absolutely NOT a dictator.

This is what I was disagreeing with. He is, de facto, a dictator right now.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But he isn't. He still has some checks. There are still laws that you can argue he is violating. He literally has to work around institutions to do what he wants to do. A pure dictator does not have anything in their path. It's important to remember that there is still resistance.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

But they simply ignore the court orders, and nothing is done. No one is punished, nothing change, no one is held accountable. Sounds like he can do whatever he wants, which he has. He fired all the people at the institutions that didn't agree with his regime's plan. So not much resistance to be had.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Kim Jong Un is a dictator - he doesn't ignore court orders. There are no court rulings against him.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

He absolutely is a dictator, undermining the democratic process, and disregarding the laws that are democratically decided.
He is behaving like a dictator, and way way overstepping the bounds of the office he was elected for. That makes him de facto a dictator despite he was originally elected.

Putin too is clearly a dictator, he imprison and kill the opposition, and the media and campaigns are rigged to his advantage, and finally elections are rigged to ensure his victory.
So no technically Putin is not elected, because the elections are staged and fake just to appear legitimate to the population, when obviously they are not.
To NOT be a dictator, the first requirement is that you are instated by an actual lawful democratic process.

Isn't the definition of an autocracy, a system where laws are used for leaders to control the people instead of people using laws to control the leaders?

[–] bdot@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

there’s two things that EVERYONE should be able to recognize about Trump, but really just boils down to one simple fact : he always says the opposite of what is true.

  • when he says “nobody knows more about this than me,” what he REALKY means is “i am completely clueless about this subject”

  • when he says “never heard of it,” he is VERY involved.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

And when he says he is not a dictator, it means he is clueless, but very involved, AND of course that he is a dictator.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago

He isn't yet but he really wants to be. At the moment what's left of the US government is still holding him back some, not everyone is willing to go along with his complete disregard for the law. The real turning point will come down to the next election and whether he's managed to rip out enough democracy and replace it with a sham to guarantee his "win" or not. The biggest roadblock towards that is unfortunately the Supreme Court a body that has already been almost entirely corrupted thanks to decades of work by previous Republican presidents.

So yes, he isn't a dictator yet, but it's not looking like there's anything stopping him from getting there eventually.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

Well hopefully he’s a dead man in hell soon

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

He dosent know or care. He just runs things how he’s use to running his own life, rights be damned. This is what you get from someone with no political experience. 0 respect towards others, the country or the constitution.

[–] zero@fek.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago
[–] eelectricshock@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I'm paraphrasing Zizek, but he said "the left needs a leader that controls executive power" and he's right. There's a difference between a benevolent dictator and a tyrant. Trump is a tyrant, in which he yields his power to prosecute and persecute. A benevolent dictator uses their power as a force for good, think FDR and whatnot.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

But a benevolent dictator can still do considerable harm. Not necessarily out of malice, but as an unintended consequence of poor decision making. So a dictator doesn't just need to be benevolent, they also need to be capable, competent, intelligent, informed, empathetic, and humble enough to listen to people who know more than them and to admit when they're wrong so they can course correct.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 10 hours ago

No. No benevolent dictator. Also FDR as dictator is quite a stretch.

Unfortunately the "heavenly mandate" is just made up by power-hungry narcissists who are searching for an excuse for their corruption and incompetence. Democracy always leads to better long-term policy outcomes than dictatorships.

load more comments
view more: next ›