I use StoryGraph for my personal library management, but Goodreads simply has better coverage of both total books and specific metadata. But Audible is the best source anyway, as it has data specific to the audiobook other sources rarely do. I've included Goodreads mostly as a fallback for books Audible doesn't have listed. One of the roadmap items is to add other sources, like Google books. At that time I would consider a source separate from Amazon/Google if a quality one can be found and conveniently called/scraped.
Thoven
joined 2 years ago
Metadata is written to the file at the time of operation, so Goodreads failing would not affect any existing metadata sourced from it. But Audible is the preferred source anyway, as it has metadata specific to the audiobook typically not available in Goodreads. I've included it as a backup for books (mostly older ones) that are not available on Audible. Goodreads allows user submissions and thus has just about every book available in its library.
It can do some metadata matching, but to my knowledge it doesn't do any of the big ticket items like combining chapter files
I was alive for but don't remember 9/11. Some might call me a Zennial.
Good old fashioned RPGs and tower defense reign supreme on long hauls. Not sure if they're on steam, but for TD the kingdom rush games are excellent. For RPG, bravely default 2 is a personal favorite. If you don't mind a game leaning difficult.
Edit: oh, and Balatro! Balatro and kingdom rush 5 got me through two 11 hour flights when I traveled overseas.
Fact of the matter is, good marketing for scummy data practices is more profitable than good data practices 10 times out of 10. Big tech is soulless and has no financial incentive to do so.
Well, if he walks like a duck and talks like a duck...
This just in: studies show heavy correlation between money laundering and shrinkflation
That is very surprising and promising, thanks for the feedback
Does anyone know how graphine performs on foldables? The big reason I haven't just switched to it is a healthy skepticism about it's ability to handle the two screens well.
Especially Raads-R, the statistical accuracy is insane. Meaning it has an unusually low rate of false positives, so a high score is a fairly reliable indicator. Especially considering it's a self report.
Edit: newer studies have found that while RAADS-R can be a useful tool to indicate need for further diagnosis, it is not as reliable as the original study indicated. Most notably, the test does an excellent job of screening for neurodivergence but fails to consider which traits are necessarily autistic and which traits are related to other conditions, such as ADHD.
view more: next ›
I've never tried it, but my father tells me that if you use ABS and include the ASIN in the metadata there's a tool (possibly built in?) that can fetch chapter timestamps