It's a very racialized term masquerading as a neutral one, with a "definition" that is secondary to its actual meaning, which is to liken to a character of the Terrorist who is like a Halloween monster. It dehumanizes its target into a completely irrational monster, who you can then say did any nonsensical evil thing you can come up with and people will believe you.
you ever notice that they never call a white male mass shooter a terrorist? instead he is usually a "gunman" or a "shooter"
I've known new athiests that call Muslims in general uncivilised and of a lesser culture
at some point mark my words someone is going to start up colonial mission trips for new athiesm
you just lost your lathe privileges
Ask him:
"Oh really? Does that include Andrew Tate? Perhaps also a sizable portion of US republicans
Watch him short-circuit.
no he doesn't like them either
requisite clip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiqnN6EU3Q0
terrorism is acceptable when all options for peaceful settlement have been foreclosed
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Yes but to be clear it's been like that for at least 50 years.
"Thug" goes in the middle somewhere
Any time someone says "terrorists" I just stop listening to them. It's an incredible cudgel for them to wield though. Look how easy it is for even a dope like Santos to just keep ringing that bell to completely shut down discussion.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Similarly, the west uses "democratic" like they used to use "civilized", although they never really stopped doing that one either
Has been a buzzword since the 2000s
chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank