this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

657 readers
536 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile the fairest economic system ever:

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ourtimewillcome@hexbear.net 75 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

this is such bullshit. the "elite" housing in the thumbnail just resembles the style of housing built in the country from the 1930s up until 1955. in accordance to first the postconstructivist and later the socialist realist architectural styles. those "worker's palaces" were in fact, as the name suggests for ordinary workers and not just societal elites.

meanwhile the latter building resembles a standardized panel-built residential complex built after khrushchevs 1955 speech recommending architectuts to make more economical use of the USSR's limited building resources. while postwar scarcity and haphazard building practices did in fact initially lead to a decrease in living quality, those issues were mostly resolved by the onset of the second generation of Soviet standard industrial housing construction by the 1970s. what all of those complexes have in common though, is that all of them provide a much higher quality of life to the common worker than anything built after 1990.

and yes, certain people, "elites" if you will, did in fact have a considerably higher quality of life than most people, but those differences where negligible in comparison to the Russian empire or any capitalist régime past or present.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah, communist elites had access, not wealth. they had connections and could arrange things. note that this is still massively less corrupt than capitalist elites, where the corruption is built right into the system, and is mostly legalized.

well, and some of them used their connections to get the nice houses taken from the bourgeoisie. at least i assume it was that way in the SU too. i know my grandma's older sister got a pretty nice house and dacha in hungary. but of course they then didnt (and couldnt) turn that into a real-estate empire or whatever ghoul shit capitalist elites do.

[–] ourtimewillcome@hexbear.net 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

true. also those (relative) privileges also extended to important engineers, scientists, managers and veterans of the great patriotic war. all of those groups are infinitely more deserving of wealth and prosperity than the "people" who get rich under capitalism

[–] BioWarfarePosadist@hexbear.net 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Economically, a true equality will never happen., however, I could deal with the world a lot better if the wealth disparity between the richest and poorest person was under 15 times higher or something like that instead of the 2478 times or higher that it is under capitalism.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

even capitalism works better when the ratio is 15 instead of a bazillion, but capitalism has no mechanism to stop it from eating itself

[–] BioWarfarePosadist@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even Marx had some praises of Capitalism. Funny how just doing your best to make things more equal can result in better outcomes! It's almost as if having high score boards and encouraging people to reach the top of that numbers game just encourages people to whatever it takes to do so.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

i learned about this from playing Workers & Resources: Soviet Republic. those older style buildings: really nice living conditions but so slooow to build and bricks while easy to manufacture are so expensive

mass production of panels FTW. can throw up a massive apartment complex for my micro-district in mere weeks

[–] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 50 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

soviet "elites": the same house as "peasants" but with funny spikes on top and a slightly different accent colour

[–] BioWarfarePosadist@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you telling me that the corruption was so bad in the USSR that some of their corrupt elites could have...

Checking my notes here...

A 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom apartment? While their poorest people were forced to live in 1 bedrooms and 2 bedrooms with 1 bathroom?

Obviously this is proof that the USSR was bad.

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ebil authoritarian gomunism is when extra bedroom

[–] BioWarfarePosadist@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

American senator to public: We cannot stand for this.

American Senator in private: So if I allow your company to bulldozer a few city blocks to replace them with 10 bedroom 13 bathroom Mansions.... I could have one of them for a low rate that guarantees 200% ROI?

I can? Great! Where's the government subsidies request form I have to fill out? Oh I don't have to? perfect

[–] sisatici@hexbear.net 46 points 3 weeks ago

Looking at soviet history, it was funny how much projection was on soviet elites. Sure they had higher luxuries than average workers. It is not easy to make the guy who handle billions of dollars work close to minimum wage. But their life standard difference was nowhere near capitalists. That was the entire reason they wanted ussr destroyed

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

According to that image, Soviet Elites has slightly larger housing and nicer brickwork. I can't imagine capitalist elites tolerating something this basic

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Capitalist elites literally blow steam out of their ears the poors sometimes aren’t doomed to homelessness or other forms of homelessness (basement dwellers, couch surfing with rich friends, etc.)

How can they enjoy their decadence when those uppity poors might still have a place to call home? Only the rich should even have the luxury of paying rent!

[–] miz@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

"if people have what they need, how will I get them to debase themselves for my own enrichment?"

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

As the libs love to say

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good

[–] prole@hexbear.net 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Me: please just vote for someone who will help us even a little bit

Libs: vote for our evil war criminal and stop with the purity tests and maybe we will help, but did you even get a Pell grant?

[–] shath@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Libs: vote for our evil war criminal and stop with the purity tests ~~and maybe we will help, but did you even get a Pell grant?~~

fixed

[–] prole@hexbear.net 20 points 3 weeks ago

I forget they basically stopped even pretending they would change things after Obama. Joe and Kamala both ran on "nothing will change" campaigns.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

Listen. I'm a practical guy. I believe in evidence-based policy-making and setting realistic goals, which is why we should adopt the policies of the Maoist Campaign Against the Landlords here in America.

[–] moss_icon@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] tim_curry@hexbear.net 35 points 3 weeks ago

As a member of the politburo I love my pointy box its so much better than the peasant non pointy box

[–] gil2455526@lemmy.eco.br 26 points 3 weeks ago

Fun fact, I live somewhat near the building of the second picture, and nowadays the facade is very worn out because there are not enough residents paying the condominium fees, people moved out because of the bad rep and closeness to the "peasantry".

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago

If you ask the average American their ideal degree of wealth inequality in a society, they'll describe the Soviet Union to you. And then they get mad at the Soviets!

[–] Bloobish@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Meanwhile in the US: here's your 250sqft shitbox, now pay me 2K a month and no I will not fix the AC. Like for real these comparisons fall flatter and flatter the more people are unable to afford even the most basic rentals.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

I have noticed in recent years that people have been coming around more and more to supporting the idea of commieblocks. Over here in Aus we've been in a "housing crisis" for decades and they keep saying we don't have enough houses for everyone (in order to artificially inflate their value of course) and the idea of fixing rent to your income instead of it being whatever the landlord can get away with. Most don't fully believe me when I say it was only 4% of income in the USSR, but it still gets them thinking, rather than just dismissing the entire thing outright.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Also, i bet whomever made this never lived in the XIX-early XX century house like that on the left pic. Some of them looked like a fucking caverns with something like 4-5 m ceiling and heat insulation was a concept lost in the architect vision. I vastly prefer live in commieblock.

[–] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

I like how the two Soviet buildings look practically identical.