this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2133 readers
87 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] scruiser@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

I like how Zitron does a good job of distinguishing firm overall predictions from specific scenarios (his chaos bets) which are plausible but far from certain. AI 2027 specifically conflated and confused those things in a way that gave it's proponents more rhetorical room to hide and dodge.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Zitron taking every opportunity to shit on Scott's AI2027 is kind of cathartic, ngl

[–] scruiser@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

I like how he doesn't even bother debunking it point by point, he just slams the very premise of it and moves on.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

it's a long one and right behind paywall there's a

Table Of ContentsHow I Am Justifying "Guessing" NVIDIA, And What Will Happen Soonest Nevertheless, NVIDIA Will Accelerate The Collapse If Its Stock Falters Big Tech's Bubble Burst Moment Will Be When Growth Slows Capital Expenditures Are The Next Thing To Go CoreWeave — A Timebomb For The Markets and AI Writ Large How Does CoreWeave Collapse? The End Of AI Startup Funding How The Collapse Of Funding Begins — A Scenario (Chaos Bet) Costs Are A Brewing Scandal In Generative AI — Another Chaos Bet The Curious World of Anthropic and OpenAI, And My Own Suspicions About Their Businesses How About Anthropic's Costs? An Important Note: Anthropic and OpenAI's Costs Are Dramatically Underrepresented Because Neither Company Pays For The Construction Of (Or Owns) Their Infrastructure Questions About OpenAI's Revenue And Costs OpenAI Is Using Cal State's "Edu" Contracts To Pump Its Paid Business User Numbers — And It's Unclear How Long It Keep A User In Its Numbers What About Government Contracts? OpenAI Is Using "$1 for a Month" Subscription Deals On Teams To Juice Business User Numbers — And Offering Deals For ChatGPT Plus For $10-a-month To Stop User Churn (REMINDER: OpenAI Loses Money On Every User Anyway) I Believe OpenAI's Costs Are Worse Than They Seem — Where Is All The Money Going? OpenAI Will Burn At Least $3 Billion On Salaries In 2025, And May Spend As Much As $8 Billion — With Any Layoffs Guaranteeing An Industry-Wide Panic Compute Costs Are Likely Astronomical, Burning At Least $15 Billion — If Not $20 Billion — In 2025 Alone OpenAI Is Bleeding Out, And Could Run Out Of Money By End Of Year Chaos Bet: Microsoft Kills OpenAI By Blocking Its Non-Profit Conversion Even If Microsoft Agrees, OpenAI Does Not Have Enough Time To Convert To A For-Profit By The End Of The Year Chaos Pick: OpenAI Does Not Convert, And Does Not Receive More Money From SoftBank Alternate Chaos Pick: OpenAI Does Convert, But SoftBank Can't Get The Money How Does OpenAI (or Anthropic) IPO? I Believe Both OpenAI and Anthropic May Be Overstating Revenues And User Numbers, Using The Media To Launder Their Reputations What Happens Next? So Why Did You Say 2027?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

RE: (meta?)speculation about the quantum bubble. So the preceding two tech bubbles tried to worm their way into the arts: NFTs, and slop. How do we think the quantum hucksters are gonna try co-opt craativity?

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago

No idea, but the big problem area to look out for imho is when it gets matched with quantum woo again. And if people manage to link that to computers.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago

Quantum as a concept doesn't really have any way to co-opt creativity that I can see - its a rather "science-y" concept in the public eye, far away from anything associated with the arts.

Probably won't stop the hucksters, though - they'll happily make shit up if it means butting in on artists' turf.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago

Automobile advertising

[–] FredFig@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

At the risk of doing some "founder mode" idiot's homework for them, impermanence is inherent to a lot of artforms, and I can see some insane and vague pitches to use quantum to "capture the magic moment". Or maybe they tie it back into NFTs with quantum technology that comes up with every variant of the bored chimpanzee at once.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

This hits differently over the recent news that ChatGPT encouraged and aided a teen suicide.

transcriptKelsey Piper xhitted: Never thought I'd become a 'take you relationship problems to ChatGPT' person but when the 8yo and I have an argument it actually works really well to mutually agree on an account of events for Claude and the ask for its opinion

I think she considers the AIs far more knowledgeable than me about reasonable human behavior so if I say something that's no reason to think it's true but if Claude says it then it at least merits serious consideration

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"When the 8-year-old and I have an argument, it actually works really well to mutually agree on an account of events... and then take cocaine together."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 12 points 1 day ago

In 12 years we'll get a book "My Mom Outsourced Raising Me to AI and it Broke Me"

[–] nightsky@awful.systems 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When an 8 year old thinks an AI is "far more knowledgeable than me about reasonable human behavior" that could lead a person to self-reflection. Could.

@nightsky @Architeuthis Computer programs are generally written to be basically polite for customer service purposes.

A generative text program that opened chats with "Ugh, what do you want THIS time, loser?" would likely find itself ....corrected.... by the parent company on short order.

[–] kgMadee2@mathstodon.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

@nightsky @Architeuthis the kid's not wrong, though 😭

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago (7 children)
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago

That is his concern and not the billionaires behind it messing with the systems so much you cant prompt override it? Please tell me this guy doesnt work in AI alignment.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes dude, that's the main thing you should be concerned about of course. AI tools couldn't possibly be bad in and of themselves, it has to be human tampering. You've always been very clear about that part.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it has to be human tampering.

and of course we all have root on the prompt, where - at will - we can just instantly impose all manner of will on the corporate vendor chatbot. y'know, the chatbot operating in a service structured as much as possible to try to do what the corporate vendor wants to desperately maintain

(it continues to astound me that anyone takes yud seriously, at all, ever)

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tfw your gifted child syndrome resentment of adults is powerful enough to make you forget about your life's work

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel dumber for having read that, and not in the intellectually humbled way.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mean, tampering with the system prompt is definitely a kind of concern, given what we've seen happen with Grok's tenure as mechahitler or Replika users finding their girlfriend no longer wanted them. But "messing with system memory" is the kind of sci-fi nonsense that should stay in a cyberpunk novel.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He has capital L Lawfulness concerns. About the parent and the child being asymmetrically skilled in context engineering. Which apparently is the main reason kids shouldn't trust LLM output.

Him showing his ass with the memory comment is just a bonus.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago

KP writing a paper for the journal “New Frontiers In Gaslighting Children”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look what they did to Notepad. Shut the fuck up. This is Notepad. You are not welcome here. Oh yeah "Let me use Copilot for Notepad". "I'm going to sign into my account for Notepad". What the fuck are you talking about. It's Notepad.

I should never have to open the settings in Notepad. Reason being: it's Notepad. God fuckin damn I hate the computer.

https://bsky.app/profile/iainnd.bsky.social/post/3lxdvmkua4227

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago

I know everybody here has heard of it, but in the small chance it breaks containment: use notepad++ it is great.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago

sex weirdo (derogatory)

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 10 points 2 days ago

I'm sorry but this is zero percent surprising like ye of course he is, he was addicted to anime porn before AI generation probably

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago

He isnt the only weird fascist attracted to digital porn. And not just the rank and file.

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago

He're hoping that the more he spends time gooning the more he'll leave the rest of us alone. crosses fingers

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Someone tried Adobe's new Generative Fill "feature" (just the latest development in Adobe's infatuation with AI) with the prompt "take this elf lady out of the scene", and the results were...interesting:

There's also an option to rate whatever the fill gets you, which I can absolutely see being used to sabotage the "feature".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›